How would you like the marriages to be conducted? simple or grand?

@krupesh (2608)
India
September 17, 2010 3:08am CST
I think it should be simple , inviting just the close ones instead of spending lots & lots of money on it.Instead the money spent on the marriages could be given to the couple for their future. Am not talking about rich people whose money spent on the marriages doesn't affect much but I am talking about the average people who spend so much for their wedding just to show off. What are your views?
4 people like this
25 responses
• Philippines
17 Sep 10
Mine is the same as yours. Simple and SOLEMN with close families and friends. But unfortunately we (my husband and I) have so many friends so it's a simple wedding still and those who were not invited, we just gave them a party after our wedding in our house. I don't believe in having a grand wedding since it's really impractical and I'm a very practical person.
1 person likes this
@krupesh (2608)
• India
17 Sep 10
..a penny saved is a penny earned.So if you have that money in your hand you always feel safe isn't it?
1 person likes this
• Philippines
17 Sep 10
I totally agree with you!
@AvI0907 (230)
• Malaysia
17 Sep 10
i agree with you. we not need to spent much for wedding party as long as we held it. The perfect marriage is not judge from how grand your wedding party is, is judge from how well your commitment with your partner. For me "simple is perfect".. have a nice day ^_^
1 person likes this
@krupesh (2608)
• India
17 Sep 10
I totally agree with you ...but how was your marriage held?
1 person likes this
23 Oct 10
Mine was very simple and basic, I think people thought it was slightly odd that we didn't want to make a big thing about it as it was just a case of getting it over and do with. It felt extremely awkward and I know my wife was very nervous but it felt amazing afterwords. I had a great sense of pride too, I had to pinch myself at points because I felt like I was dreaming. LOL
• United States
17 Sep 10
I think that it should be whatever the couple wants and can afford. If they can afford a lavish wedding, then they should be able to have it. Unfortunately, even a "simple" wedding is very expensive these days, so many people can't afford to do much. We cut costs and did as much of the stuff as we could ourselves, and it was still pretty expensive considering our income. I mean, it definitely would be considered "cheap" or "inexpensive" compared to most weddings, but we were very happy with it and thought it was beautiful, which is all that really matters in the long-run.
• United States
17 Sep 10
Well, we did get to spend time with our friends and family, and it was a lot of fun. Of course, there were pictures and recordings, and I am very glad of that. When you can look back on special days such as your wedding day and remember the fun and good times that you shared with your loved ones, especially the the ones that are no longer with you, then you are reminded again that those are the happy times that you want to hold on to and remember that you shared with them. Showing them pictures just is not the same, especially if they were not there and are not in any of the pictures with you ... to me it is kind-of like you are excluding them from the most important events in your life, and that does not feel right to me.
@vandana7 (100257)
• India
18 Sep 10
Out here, it is such a hurried stuff. Invariably somebody feels slighted for not having been spoken to properly. Then gifts are given to the bride's and bridegroom's relatives. Again, who is given and who is left out creates rifts. I remember I received a saree, and uncle's cousin refused to take hers, saying hers was not as costly as mine. I never took any gifts after that. Marriages are supposed to bring people together, not create such unnecessary feelings. Dont you think? That is why I feel a smaller scale would be a good thing.
1 person likes this
@vandana7 (100257)
• India
17 Sep 10
Hi PA - I am ok with the affordability clause. Because they really want it, and can afford to pay for it, why not? :) Personally, it doesnt make sense at all! You dont get to spend time with anybody. Just to show oneself dressed well? That can be done with the help of video camera as well. So the next time the friend visits you, you could show them those photographs or recordings. Why call him over, spend fortune, and not have more than 5 minutes to talk to him or her? Just for dinner? Better to take the friend and family out some other time. A more personal relationship would be there, and the time spent like that would become part of good memories. I keep wondering when relationships sour, remembering the grandeur at wedding may add to the pain, isn't it?
@vandana7 (100257)
• India
17 Sep 10
I think there should be tax on how much is spent on marriages. :) Things will come to right perspective. :) Tax at the rate of 30 percent. :)
@krupesh (2608)
• India
17 Sep 10
..my first thing is why spend so much on marriages...later on we can talk about the tax
1 person likes this
• United States
17 Sep 10
But Vandy, there is already a tax placed on everything involving a wedding. The caterers charge a tax and sometimes even an extra fee for delivery, set-up and clean-up of the food or they charge if they have to have servers for sit-down meals. If you are preparing the food yourself, then the grocery store already charges a tax on the food, at least on some items, although many food items at the grocery store are not taxed some of them are. They charge a tax on the gown and tuxedo, and they may even charge alteration fees. They charge tax on the reception site, unless it is held at a private residence. The church even charges a fee (known as a donation), and they have a "tax" or offering for the set-up and clean-up of the church, even if you have a simple wedding without a bunch of flowers and candles and such. I really don't see how taxing everything more is going to help anyone. However, that is just here, and maybe everything is not taxed where you are.
@vandana7 (100257)
• India
17 Sep 10
Where brains are not able to decide on why's, taxes would help.
@sweet_pea (3322)
• Philippines
17 Sep 10
My husband & I were married twice. First in a civil ceremony where only 4 people were present, me, my husband & 2 witnesses. After a year, we had our church wedding where only our immediate family, some relatives & close friends were present. It was very solemn & personal. I don't want a grand wedding because I think it is more practical to use the money in more important things such as building your own house. It is not the wedding that matters but the marriage after that one time event.
1 person likes this
@kaka135 (14931)
• Malaysia
18 Sep 10
I always like my wedding to be simple. To me, the most important is the two people are happy and lovely, hence ceremony is not so necessary to me. Also, there are lots of time and money spent in the wedding and also the preparation, sometimes I just don't understand why we need to spend so much there. I agree with you that we should actually save the money for other purposes.
@bellis716 (4799)
• United States
19 Sep 10
I think that a lavish wedding is wasteful. If they can afford it, the money could be better spent elsewhere, or given to charity. If the money for the wedding had to be borrowed, it is not only wasteful, it is sinful. A wedding can be tasteful without being lavish.
@JenInTN (27514)
• United States
18 Sep 10
I am in favor of a simple celebration that has close and personal meaning for the couple. You are right that money can be better spent on a couple's future or even a great honeymoon. Take care.
@aerous (13434)
• Philippines
20 Sep 10
Simple and grand occasions in wedding is the same. They are both useless when they married did not materialize or success. But the different is that simple less money to expense than grand wedding which need more money to conduct it... Have a great day!
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
21 Sep 10
Unless you simply have too much money to know what to do with... there is no reason to blow tons of money on one day that will be over and done with in mere hours. I'd rather buy a car, or a home, or even a TV set. They last years, not hours, and sometimes cost much less too. Invest in things that are useful, rather than some massive wedding everyone will forget about in a few years.
@dorannmwin (36392)
• United States
19 Sep 10
When my husband and I were married six years ago, we had a relatively simple wedding. We were married in our home church and had family members and a few close friends there. We saved as much money as we were able to by doing as much of the wedding ourselves like the decorations and such. Despite the fact that we spent far less on our wedding than some other people that we know, it was a huge success and people still talk about it.
@ybong007 (6643)
• Philippines
21 Sep 10
If you have the money that why not spend it on a grand wedding after all it's a very special occasion. But if you have just enough, then a simple wedding is the practical thing to do. I have nothing against rich people spending so much for a wedding since it's their money after all.
• Philippines
19 Sep 10
I'm married 24 years ago; my wedding was a very simple one. My husband and I were married only in the judge's office. So it was a simple, civil wedding and up to now I'm looking forward to have a mass wedding offered by our church every year. I know this rites is very simple but what matters is it's formality. Church wedding is required in my religion.
@laydee (12798)
• Philippines
18 Sep 10
I'd rather have a small or simple wedding with people who I know. I don't want a lavish wedding. All I want is to have my family there and the family of my partner. What's important to me is that we both love each other and would like to make that step together.
@Lore2009 (7378)
• United States
18 Sep 10
If I am ever to marry, I would have a small one. If the marriage ends and you spend a lot of money and effort on it, it would be such a waste!! Haha.
@jet2r0cks (190)
• Philippines
18 Sep 10
I don't think it's wrong to have grand weddings but people who get married to show off are just stupid. You get married to proclaim your love for your chosen spouse, and not to show everyone how much money you got. My boyfriend and I discussed this about this before. Of course, we have our dream wedding but we really just wanna get married, so as soon as we can we'll probably have a civil wedding. After some time and when we have enough money, maybe we'll have another, grander wedding for an anniversary :
• Philippines
18 Sep 10
It's so nice to have a grand marriage but for me I want it to be simple because for me it doesn't matter how your marriage be conducted. We should also be practical so I prefer a simple marriage.
@jagjit273 (1754)
• India
18 Sep 10
I totally agree with you my friend.You are very right.In this price hike and expenseive, high rated. one should go in for simple marriage.I have also planned to do a simple marriage.No pump and show.I wonder if my future spouse would agree with me on this point. have a nice day
@asyria51 (2861)
• United States
18 Sep 10
I did both. I had a simple courthouse wedding with just my immediate family. Then two years later we renewed our vows. I wore the white dress, with the tiara and updo. we had a ton of friends and family there. We did keep to a strict budget. Found my dress online for less than a hundred dollars. Had a friend starting a catering business cater for cost, as long as we would be references. Had the reception outside at the church. Our parents paid for the booze, because neither of us are big drinkers. The biggest expense was renting a tent, and the DJ. All in all we spent just around 2800. We alloted 3000.