So Sad for the People of North Triangle QC,Philippines...

Demolition - QC North Triangle
Philippines
September 23, 2010 5:45am CST
BUt come to think of it. such constructions of commercial spaces is good for investors to start their companies there. of course, we must admit the relocation site doesn't even have infrastructures, that's why they didn't agree with this. I wonder why the Government allowed squatters to get this big in the first place? there should a be a law about this. so that there won't be an unfairness removal and outrage violence of the people who lives in the squatters area. these are one of the reasons why we don't have development. but i wonder how it has gotten so many and so big. no offense, what are the provinces doing to make their municipalities better? so that there won't be people risking their lives in National Capital Region. I feel bad for those motorist who got stuck to the traffic and weren't able to proceed to where they going. of course, they blame QC officials and the President. it's the usual when you're about to be removed, you get to blame everything... but Tension stopped when TRO was presented by the Court.
1 person likes this
9 responses
@tigeraunt (6326)
• Philippines
23 Sep 10
dear letranknight, i am not from these area you are talking of but i can very well relate because i work in an environment full of people who thinks that it is their home .. parcels of private land owned and paid for by another. they will not get out of the land unless there is a court order proving that they are not owners (when in the first place they know they are not.) they take the time enriching themselves at the expense of the landowners who does the paying of taxes.. and when it is time for them to move out, they make themselves available to the media as the aggrieved parties.. the very poor who the government are not helping.. etc. blah blah. where is fair play here? ann
1 person likes this
@tigeraunt (6326)
• Philippines
26 Sep 10
dear eileen and letranknight, i think the law about private land has to be looked upon. the city government especially the city engineers need to be very vigilant. when complaints about illegal structures are sent to them, they should act swift and ask for building permits and if the builder could not show any, they should then make orders of demolition. if these "squatters" want to live in the city, they should be fair like pay taxes the way land owners are doing. ann
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
23 Sep 10
I agree with thee. Three years ago, I sat beside two young ladies munching McDonald's chicken at Trinoma. I asked them why they like McDo chicken when KFC chicken are bigger and crunchier. They said they didn't know that. Then I asked from where they hail because I came a long way to be at Trinoma, the now famous Triangle North of Manila mall. The girls told me that they lived just across the street and they are wary about arson. When I asked why, they said that they had been given the notice to evacuate. The squatters' area will be developed for progressive infrastructures.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
26 Sep 10
Hello tiger aunt, I wonder why such people are protected knowing that squatters are also hide out of the criminals.i think these are the people who don't want to sacrifice for the benefit of thsoe who will get jobs in the future. i agree with herbert there about what he said on people laundering on each other. like renting their not owned apartment not land for almost 50 dollars, that's inhuman.
1 person likes this
• United States
24 Sep 10
I watched this news last night and the thing the really most disturb me is that children also joins to the rally and this WTF parents let them join knowing the danger will be. I'm sorry to tell this but how I wish the motorist just run through all of them! I feel sorry for the people that will be oust in the area but this is too much that they risk there lives just for the land that they don't own! Well expect a lot of finger pointing again and who's to blame, Guess what?... not other than Mr. President... oh how I love Philippines!...
• Philippines
26 Sep 10
Hello there, SO sad indeed. they don't owned that Land in the first place, the owners should have built a big WALL there while there was still few people. i can only blame the governments lackness of support.
• United States
24 Sep 10
Oh other thing... Not only the residents will be sad when they are oust there. The Lasenggeros! Where do you expect them to buy kambings for there pulutan now?
@rsa101 (38166)
• Philippines
23 Sep 10
Well let's just be frank about this. Votes can easily be bought by these politicians during election time. It is in the squatter's area where politicians can buy some votes sometimes these can dictate the outcome of an election. That is why politicians when in power do not usually interfere with them. But of course when interested businessman would start getting interested on those lands that were occupied by these informal settlers of course the local government would love to turn their back to their patrons during election since there is more money that can be generated from new businesses that can be generated from that idle land. This means big business so since election time is far it is high time they could exercise their executive powers to enforce its right over the land. The offered alternative is of course not of the same situation as they were but I think they have to really start from scratch in their new place. But at least NHA said the land is already theirs and they just have to pay minimal per month. For me that is a good bargain already knowing that they can finally settle in their own piece of land than live in the city that is full or hardships as well.
@rsa101 (38166)
• Philippines
24 Sep 10
Well that is short of saying that money talks! I am saddened that sometimes these informal settlers are also being taken advantage not only of politicians but some syndicates from within their ranks that earn money from making troubles and letting them stay in the land they have really no rights on. Sometimes these are double edged sword they are in right now.
• Philippines
23 Sep 10
Hello RSA, Not to mention, they don't even think hard only do it because of MONEY. and then, afterwards they're the ones who suffered in the END. i don't get these squatters, they can always starts a new, having THEIR own land. they just don't think anymore, at least there is a relocation site, better than nothing.
@elmiko (6630)
• United States
24 Sep 10
they don't pay them for their property first?
• Philippines
26 Sep 10
they don't have a property, they just lived in some one elses.
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
23 Sep 10
Knight, the slum mommies are dropping kids like rabbits. It's the deprived's nocturnal hobby. Would that answer your pondering about population explosion unchecked by the local government? A baby has not reached his first birthday yet and he has a new sibling on the way! Today is another day, I do hope the squatters concede and move on to a better life in the mountains of Rizal or their home province.
• Philippines
26 Sep 10
Hello there, I think the fault of the government here is that they didn't make a structural progress on the relocation site. NO water and Electricity connection yet. don't they understand with the new commercial building a lot more jobs can be created?
@TheAdvocate (2392)
• Philippines
23 Sep 10
The issue of urban settlers has always been a hot issue here in the country where 1/3 of the entire population live below the poverty line. On one hand, we have the Lina law which protects these settlers that they cannot be removed without compensation. On the other hand, this is only good if the owner is a big corporation or a rich family who can afford to pay the compensation. We all know that is not the case here in the Philippines. For the most part, landowners are middle-class families who work for years just to buy a piece of property. They cannot afford to hire security to protect their properties. So in the end, they do not reap the rewards of their hard work. If you think about it, the landowner has to pay the robber. Which is not fair. The people in North Triangle are protected by syndicates who prey on our poor countrymen who cannot afford a decent shelter over their head. They already have a relocation site but their job is in MM and so they will return to the same place.
• Philippines
23 Sep 10
THAT'S FREAKING CRAZY! Then now, they have the BALLS to even rally that causes traffic near the MRT Station! how did this start in the first place? thank god some of our lands are located in the Province and not in the NCR. no wonder some how i don't feel remorse with those people and that's probably why Herbert really wanted to pursue this "back to province" program.
@EdnaReyes (2622)
• Philippines
25 Sep 10
one percent I agree with you. How about us, we're breaking our back and bones working just to pay for amortization of our houses. How unfair ,they just built their house on a vacant land and then at the end ask for relocation and free house without paying a single tax? Ka-swerte naman nila, why if this the case,people will just built houses on vacant lands!
@kmaram (2533)
• Philippines
23 Sep 10
Hi there, its in the news all day long today. My view with this one is i felt sorry for those people of North Triangle Q.C but i guess its better for them to relocate on a new site. Although they are complaining that there's no electricity with the new relocation site this is the start of new beginning for them. I guess they should follow what the law is, just be thankful that still there is a place for them. Hope everything would be ok while this demolition was on going. And no people will be hurt while this situation was happening, hope i can make sense here hahah
@eurekafemme (5876)
• Philippines
23 Sep 10
Hi, Knight.:) Well, it takes two to tango. If there are no people leaving their communities in the province to look for a greener pasture, trying their luck in the city, failed and refused to go home, there'll be no squatters. If there are no greedy politicians to accommodate them and allowed them to occupy the lot which is not theirs really, there'll be no squatters. Why the government allowed this thing to happened? It is because of politics. These squatters can generate a tremendous number of voters for the politicians in that area/city.I don't think that politicians gained more votes from the elites and alta sociedad, it is the masses that gives them the number of votes that they need to win the elections. And where are these masses? Those that are in the squatters area.... Sometimes, I couldn't help myself feeling annoyed with these people also. Why don't they go back to the province? Why they keep on insisting of staying here in the city when they can not cope with the cost of living here? Man sometimes is so full of foolish pride.... They will keep on pretending they are ok even if they are not anymore... Who's to blame here, then? Everybody seems to have a reason of their own...
• Philippines
26 Sep 10
Hello Eureka, Your right, it was never the people to blame. to begin with, it has always been with the government who only want power and nothing more. a lot has not so much opportunities in the provinces that most go to the cities to try out. times it became bigger and most doesn't remember where they come from.
@diogz22 (516)
• Philippines
23 Sep 10
There are different sectors in the government that offer housing projects to our countrymen they just don't grab the opportunity. They settle for the easier and free route which is to squat on someone's property. Man in nature is unfair they always want something to be free like in this case. I agree with you knight regarding the impeding development of our country because of people who don't want to get out of their comfort zone. If we really want to develop our country into an emerging country of the 20th century we should learn to get out of our comfort zone. With regards to squatting there are even politicians that do this just to grab land from someone they dislike. There is also a so called professional squatter since I think there is a law that states that if a land is not claimed by anyone in a term of ten years that land will be given to the persons living in that piece of land. It is some sort of that. But I am not sure about that law. I remembered it from somewhere thou.
• Philippines
23 Sep 10
They were a lot better plans back then. but all changed since Martial Law. since then, a lot has nothing more than bad planning turning bad news. i believe a lot are doing that only to give up in the end. believe me, even before i was a college student, some where trying best to make this country better. not it's not enough.