Six Men Arrested for Burning Koran. So much for free speech in the UK!

@Taskr36 (13963)
United States
September 27, 2010 11:30pm CST
Yup, a bunch of guys decided to burn the koran, recorded themselves doing it, and posted it on youtube. They were arrested on suspicion of "stirring racial hatred". These guys could serve up to SEVEN YEARS for this. Is this not crazy? Should they really be JAILING people for burning a book just because it offends people? Obviously this would be a gross violation of the constitution in the US, but we're dealing with the UK here so I'm curious as to how any citizens of that country on mylot feel about this. European countries clearly don't believe in the same rights that the US has through the 1st amendment.
6 people like this
14 responses
• United States
28 Sep 10
It's kind of the same way here, Taskr36, only people won't get arrested, more like Muslims will just get really angry at them and threaten them. Personally, I think that book burning is ridiculous. I wouldn't do it, but I am going to stop people who do. Today is "Banned Books" month, and the book of the month is also "Fahrenheit 451", and us book lovers are kindly asking people not burn books, instead have intelligent conversation on the content in the books. I think that having a debate is better than burning a book.
• United States
28 Sep 10
Sorry, I meant that I am NOT going to stop people who burn books, but seriously, people should try and stay away from burning books.
• United States
28 Sep 10
Okay, Taskr36, my eyes just lit up when you told me that were librarian. That is awesome! My major in college is English Literature and Language, so I truly respect books no matter how good or how they may be. I think that people to have the right to say what they want to say, and to burn books if they want to, but I don't think that burning books is the right thing to do. I am glad that we are same page (pardon the pun) on this issue. And yes, banned books are always the best, also, I do love the Harry Potter series.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
28 Sep 10
I don't know if I've told you before, but I'm a librarian. Every library I've been at has celebrated banned books week. Banned books are almost always the best, most culturally significant books out there so it's a great time for awareness. I agree that book burning is pretty ridiculous, but if someone wants to celebrate their ignorance or intolerance, that's their business. Some authors actually laugh at people who burn books as it increases the popularity of their material. Just look at what it did for the Harry Potter series.
1 person likes this
@dfollin (25351)
• United States
28 Sep 10
They were not speaking,therefore it can not be classified as freedom of speech.It was an action that could be used to stir racial hatred.They were rightfully arrested.Plus in some places they can also be charged for starting a fire. I live in the state of Virginia in the United States and when I was a kid my grandfather used to burn leaves in an old small paint can outside.But,by the time I became a teenager it became against the law in this state to have a fire in anything that it is not meant to be in.You can have a fire in,for example,a fireplace,grill and those things you can have on your patio that are made to have a fire in.If you are out at a campground you can have a campfire that is controlled,like with rocks around it.
1 person likes this
@djbtol (5493)
• United States
28 Sep 10
If I remember correctly, the liberals (like obama and his crowd) claimed freedom of speech when they were burning the American flag, even though that is not speaking. Freedom of speech has grown to include freedom of expression, I believe.
@Latrivia (2878)
• United States
28 Sep 10
Well, Americans are a little more privileged than other countries...in most cases. In America you can burn a flag, bible, or Koran, and as long as you aren't violating fire codes, the authorities can't stop you or punish you. Of course, that's not to say we have totally free speech here. After all, we have a congressionally sanctioned group of people who can and do limit what we say in a public forum. You know the group I'm talking about. Britain does not have what we have in personal rights. If I recall, hate speech is illegal there, and burning a Koran is definitely a form of hate speech. We think it's crazy because we don't have such limits here. However, I haven't met many UK residents who disagree with the hate speech law.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
29 Sep 10
"Yet you (assuming you are American) enjoy the right to insult American society by claiming that our freedom of speech is somehow tantamount to societal decay when that speech takes on a disagreeable nature. Do you see how this works? " Brilliantly said Latrivia. It is important for people to realize how these freedoms go both ways.
@Latrivia (2878)
• United States
29 Sep 10
Yet you (assuming you are American) enjoy the right to insult American society by claiming that our freedom of speech is somehow tantamount to societal decay when that speech takes on a disagreeable nature. Do you see how this works? That is the beauty of freedom of speech, and I disagree with your assessment. Frankly I think the societal decay comes in when the government places it's boot on our throats to silence us when it doesn't want to hear what we have to say. It's a sign of tyranny, and not a very endearing quality in a governing body. No, it's not very polite to go around burning someone's holy symbols or national flag - but I'd rather live in a place where that can be done, rather than a place where someone gets thrown in prison for simply expressing their opinion.
• United States
28 Sep 10
When it becomes a privilege to insult people's symbols any where in the world, it is a sign up decay for that society. Any Muslim that burns a flag, bible, torah or anything a people values that Muslim is not follow the Qur'an nor the Prophet peace be upon.
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
28 Sep 10
Actually if I remember correctly even here in the US there are limits on free speech like: yelling fire in and incited panic, threatening people with harm, inciting riots... This story is actually old news and I was very surprised to see it posted here.
@jb78000 (15139)
28 Sep 10
i think we can probably expect to see it posted by 700 more people rather less sensible than taskr within the next few hours.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
28 Sep 10
The story is barely a week old. How is that old news? I meant to post it last week, but never got around to it. Yelling fire in a crowded place has the risk of immediately causing people to be trampled and killed as does inciting a riot. Do you really think that's the same as burning a book and posting it on youtube?
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
28 Sep 10
LOL No rabbit that would only happen it if was the christian bible. Taskr sorry I heard about this story more than a week ago and I remember clearly thinking about the date and that pastor guy. Do I really think it's the same? It's not the exact same but, it's in the same context. From what I've heard and understand the people that practice Islam are really offended by it and look at people here in this country that are offended by things. How many abortion clinics have been blown up because Christians are so offended by it? Let me ask you this, why are the Islamic people suppose to act rationally when offended but Christians are exempt from rational thinking? If an Islamic person is so offended that they will act out violently to the burning of the Koran then why should non-Islamic people be able to burn it? Why should those people burning it be allowed to incite violence? Do we not have enough violence in the world? And, if you really think about it the US no longer allows the KKK to burn crosses in African-American's front yards anymore. I'm sure the KKK would say it is in violation of their free speech so, does that make it right? Should we allow cross burnings again? Now, I am bias because I think no book should be burned ever no matter the subject or contents.
@adhyz82 (36249)
• Indonesia
28 Sep 10
as a moslem i regret this case... for us Alquran (many forigner says koran) is holy books.. if christian think bibble as holy book, so thats our mind to Al Quran.. whats the matter of Alquran?? we never burn the bibble...but why many people in western always hate our holy book??
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
28 Sep 10
JB is right. It is a very small group of people that feel the need to spread their message of hate rather than to work toward peace. They do not express the feelings of all Americans any more than the extremist muslims speak for all Muslims. Most of us are very peaceful and would love to see world peace. People that post such hate for the world to see just make it that much more difficult to achieve.
@jb78000 (15139)
28 Sep 10
i don't think it is many people adhyz. it is a tiny minority of nutcases trying to get attention. unfortunately they usually do.
• Indonesia
29 Sep 10
Well, I'm not a fanatics, but I respect The Holly Quran with all of my heart. I hope that this small group of nutcases (as Jb said :p) will find another usefull way to express their self, and I hope they won't get cursed for what they've done, LOL.
@jb78000 (15139)
28 Sep 10
no country, including yours taskr, has completely free speech. and most have laws against inciting hatred. some 'free' (as opposed to repressive) countries have even stricter laws but you wouldn't (well i wouldn't) say they were suppressing free speech. try and deny the holocaust in germany, publically, and you are facing arrest. and they have an extremely good reason for doing this. same goes for stirring up racial hated, which is illegal in the uk. no, i don't have a problem with it.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
28 Sep 10
Thank you for sharing your opinion. You were the first person I thought of when I Read this as you are a regular poster here from the UK. I know that free speech is far less free in Europe which is why I wanted opinions on this. I think Germany has some of the strangest laws as they can't even make board games that have a war theme to them.
@jb78000 (15139)
28 Sep 10
think about why taskr. anyway while i personally have no problem with the laws in the uk i might not want it to be either as strict as some other european countries, or perhaps as lax as your country. none of these countries counts as repressive though, when you are not allowed to criticise the government and websites get blocked then start worrying.
@djbtol (5493)
• United States
28 Sep 10
So they burnt the Koran, I can understand why. Should they be arrested - of course not. Is is a hate crime? Only if we also agree that making Christians remove the ten commandments from public display is a hate crime against Christians. Otherwise, it is just freedom of expression. I would like to hear from the UK, but in the US we cannot promote the Muslim faith above others.
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
28 Sep 10
If I burn the flag that is OK even though it upset some people but if I burn a religious or publish a cartoon that a certain group finds offensive that is wrong and I can be arrested. Why is that? Maybe because the people who are offended will riot and destroy property and kill people. This is very similar to what the radicals were doing in the 60's in the US with Civil Rights. Militant Black leaders were talking hate and violence toward the establishment (white culture) and communities were giving into the demands to try to prevent riots and violence. In the riots in Cleveland, Ohio, after the first night of rioting the Mayor issued an order to shoot looters. The next night things seemed to quiet down until some people spoke out against order saying it was too harsh and that the looters were felt that they were only getting what was due them from years of overcharging of the residents. After that the order was lifted and it took several more days to stop the rioting and restore order. You can not give into the threat of violence. Sooner or later you will have to face them and defeat them or be defeated by them. In almost every case in a conflict that was stopped before one side was victorious what you were left with was a festering situation that sooner or later would erupt again with more and more people dying and suffering as a result.
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
28 Sep 10
No, they shouldn't be jailing people for burning a book. Let's see now, I burning a book is a hate crime, then what is it called when Muslims burn Christians for not converting to Islam? I see stories about this practice fairly often.... and it isn't limited to Christians either... anyone who isn't Muslim is far game to these people. So which practice is the real hate crime?
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
28 Sep 10
I am torn on this one. I am all for free speech but when your free speech has no other intent then to provoke hate toward a certain group...well, where do we draw the line? I mean that was their purpose in taking the time to video tape it and air it on the internet...right? Here in the states we had a minister that was intending to hold a Koran burning Day. It was heavily broadcast. While not "legally" wrong, seriously it had the potential to cause a lot of trouble for others like our soldiers overseas who may or may not feel the same. Luckily he was talked out of this. I do see what you are saying here...we are all entitled to our own opinions. I think the media and the internet make it easier to spread these hateful messages and incite extremists giving their hateful message all that much more power and steam.
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
28 Sep 10
Search "burning bible" on youtube and see how many videos come up. There are all sorts of people out there burning the Christian Bible, from Marilyn Manson to a bible burning with a song for Satan, billed under "Satanic Relaxation". There's even one video that works at being equally offensive to Christians and Muslims by burning a Koran and a Bible together. Where are the police? Well, they're busy with real criminals, not with people who make a political or cultural statement with a match and some lighter fluid. Because it's freedom of expression and that ought to be expressly the law in every nation. Laws that prohibit this kind of freedom of speech are in place because of fear. They don't fear to offend as much as they fear what the offended will do about it. That's why burning a Bible is not a hate crime, but burning a Koran is a hate crime. Christians won't kill you for burning a Bible, so there's no law against it. Is it "racial hatred" they are really worried about, or violent repercussions? No law should be established out of fear of allowing people their basic human right to self-expression.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
28 Sep 10
Yeah, I remember the Marilyn Manson thing. Many people PEACEFULLY protested outside of his concert. He just loved the publicity. However he was never attacked, his concerts were never bombed, and police never arrested him for burning bibles because, as you said, they would rather deal with actual crimes.
@Adoniah (7513)
• United States
28 Sep 10
The more they make of this kind of thing, the worse it will get. I have yet to see anyone arrested for burning the Torah and yet it is done. I have see Torah scrolls burned and no one has done anything. I have seen Synagogues defaced and nothing was done. A Rabbi was attacked in Cocoa Bch. Fl. and nothing was done. His daughter was stripped and tossed into assembly in the basketball auditorium and nothing was done. They were Hasidim and she dressed in long skirt and long sleeves. They were different and therefore provoked attack....It was their fault.... The burning of a Quran is not going to incite any more hatred than is already there. Just as a girl wearing a long skirt is not going to incite any more hatred than is already there. Constant PUBLICITY and STUPID LAWS WILL continue the problem however. Just keep stirring the pot people.... Shalom~Adoniah
@jonesg (7)
• United States
28 Sep 10
I find it interesting that any burning of a religious book would be consider freedom speech. In the Qur'an a Muslim does not have the right to insult other peoples Gods or relgion, nor destroy their places of worship. So we muslims don't share the rights as non-muslims. Anyone who is proud that their documents protects them to destroy something that is dear to another people while that people are citizens in that country is failure on the part of the government to protect is citizens. And it a black mark upon the citizens.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
28 Sep 10
I find it odd that you would say that. I much objections from Muslims when the Taliban went out of their way to destroy every hint of non-Muslim relics, temples, shrines, etc. in Afghanistan. They even destroyed ancient Buddhist statues that other countries offered to BUY for large amounts of money just to keep them intact. Note that not ONE Buddhist reacted with violence. Say what you will of me or my country, but I am proud that expression, even unpopular, uncouth, or offensive expression, is protected in my country.
• Philippines
28 Sep 10
It's just a damn book. But the Muslim community has significant symbol into it. so, i think it's just a waste of time to burn such. it's not really degrading free speech, but is already an act of hate, something that terrorist do and not some ordinary people. I am a Christian and this is wrong as far as am concerned. this isn't the time to hate but a time to unite and heal. we are not these fanatics, therefore we shouldn't act like one. we are educated for petes sake.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
28 Sep 10
I agree that it's hateful, but not comparable to what terrorists do as nobody was harmed. Terrorists kill people and use fear. These morons were just being hateful and I don't think they were scaring anyone. I agree that it's wrong, but it is certainly not an act that should be called criminal.