Court Verdict - Ayodhya
By khad2000
@khad2000 (183)
India
October 8, 2010 5:12am CST
Schools closed, Banks locked and cities became paralyzed ....Then came the verdict of the Allahabad High court amid the chaos made by the various media
Now for the media ,it is festival ,all the super intellectuals were on TV Particularly super intellectuals like Bharka dutt , and Javed Akter on NDTV and what a intellectual analysis it was , wow . .some one correctly termed as GOODY GOODY parties of Barkha Dut pseudo secular analysis of Bharka Dutt ,.lol.The final out of Barka dutt was .it was Hindus case all the way and out of generosity they gave land to build the masjid.
Anyway , the verdict was ,one third goes to Muslim and two thirds goes to Hindus but no one mention the ground on which verdict was given because there was no archeological evidence presented ,both for Ram janma as well as for the temple before the masque in 15th century
Yet the verdict came and I feel it is the verdict of politicians, i have my own reasons
If the entire land was given to Muslim , then it will became a good piece of cake for the BJP ,which desperately wants to encash on Hindu vote and congress may lose the next election
If the entire land was given to Hindus , then BJP may lose Muslims as well as Christians vote , which had became the reality for its lose in previous elections (don’t forget that BJP promised Hindus it will never allow any • masjid in Ram jamna bhoomi)
So, both BJP and CONGRESS came to a conclusion and the final output of this conclusion is the verdict which save guarded both congress and bjp
As per me, I honestly believe that Hindus have more theological right than Muslims on the land, because, for Muslims it is a piece of land where as for Hindus it is RAM JANMA BHOOMI (BITH PLACE OF RAM)
legally , this case may belong to Muslim , But Muslims should HAVE GIFTED TO HINDUS FOR THE BELIEF ,THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN A SCALP ON THE FACE OF VOTE BANK ORIENTED POLITICIANS
2 responses
@kiran8 (15348)
• Mangalore, India
9 Oct 10
I too have felt that the whole issue was much ado about nothing.It doesnt matter one way or the other as far as I am concerned and believe me and that goes for at least 75% of the population , who have more important things like making two ends meet and how to survive in this man kill man world.But I am glad with the verdit because it had the desired effect and there was no violence, disruption of peace anywhere . I think what is more important is to give a decent living condition to the people of India regardless of religion, caste or creed and not worry about building Mosque or temple....
@khad2000 (183)
• India
11 Oct 10
You are correct , Kiran , the out come of the verdict did not created any violence.But just imagine , with a land of about 2.7 acers our politicians made the waves of hatred .One thing i should say here , there were no violence scenes in the country because politicians did not wanted any violence to happened other wise it would have been a difference stories . Do you think ,people are fighting each other ,kiran .I am sorry to say ,kiran , as you said ,people are busy in finding the means of living and they never fight each other .It is politicians who make them fight .every politician(most of them are ruffians) ,immaterial of religion , must have a team of goodas and ruffians which they use on this occasions and poor people get effected
@pankajgarg (797)
• India
9 Oct 10
one religion should not prosper of followed by keeping foot on the other. the indian justice have to take care of all religions and prevent violation on the basis of religion as india is a secular country.
according to me the allahabad high court has given a very fair verdict on the long dispute and this is the right way by distributing land to both