is the Divas title more utilised than the tag team title?
By stardustcdsd
@stardustcdsd (1856)
India
October 19, 2010 2:35am CST
hi friends.
just wondering,even if they are annoying team laycool is atleast making sure nobody forgets that there is a divas title
can't honestly say the same about the tag team titles.
there was jerishow and showmiz but come to think of it,there aren't any interesting tag teams in WWE.
hard dynasty is boring
nobody knows what the usos are doing.
and ofcourse they keep splitting good teams like legacy,miz & morrison,cryme time.
how long its been the tag team matches made headlines in a payper view?
are they wasting the titles?
1 response
@alaneapen (29)
• United States
8 Nov 10
Most of the veterans who made tag teams worth watching are either retired, gone to TNA or have been promoted to main event. For example, BOD- Kane and Undertaker and Edge have been promoted to the main event, the hardys not appearing gain in WWE and the dudleys went to TNA. However, bringing back the great tag teams of old would do more harm than good because they would bury the rookie tag teams and there is no way undertaker and Kane or edge and christian would put over a rookie tag team. There should be a need for better tag teams because the main event is not everything on RAW OR Smack down , there needs to be mid card talent to fill the gap.
