Legend of the Titanic: The Animated Film
By AliaKane
@AliaKane (97)
United States
October 27, 2010 4:50pm CST
This is the story of one of the world greatest disaster. The movie contains love at first sight, talking animals, talking dolphins, wait no, talking, flying dolphins, thankfully no rapping dog, and an octopus with a nose.
It does exist. Look it up if you dare. So bad that it eludes an entery on IMBD apparently.
A while back, I started a discussion on Titanic the Animated. Apparently this movie came before that rip-off. So no wonder the other was titled: The Legend Continues.
The animation is better but very lazy and laced with cheap CGI. And it contains an extreme example of that dreadful love at-first-sight plot. And it sends the message that beauty=goodness.
*Faceplams* And I learned that the voice of the film's antagonist is apparently the same man who voiced the RAPPING DOG in the other movie!
Don't get me started on the sequel. Maybe I'll discuss it later.
And the ultimate question we are all asking God, which movie is the worst?
Seriously, I can believe that! They need to be sued. The disaster when thousands SURVIVED with the help of a giant octopus after the octopus tossed that iceberg should not be disrespe- ... Wait, what did I just say... ARGHHHHHHH!
1 person likes this
2 responses
@allyoftherain (7208)
• United States
28 Oct 10
They don't need to be sued! I told you this on the other thread you made. The company probably doesn't exist anymore and even if it does they're likely EONS embarrassed about these films and are hoping that all mention of them will go away. Even if that wasn't the case... why would you sue someone who didn't have any money?
@AliaKane (97)
• United States
28 Oct 10
That's the point, it's so bad that regardless of the company's existance, it should be sued! A hyperbole for effect.
Then what was the need for them to have a sequel? Where did money provided for the sequel come from? As a matter of fact, I read somewhere that it did successfully at box office in Italy. Maybe the fact that a sequel existed is evidence for that statement I read. Or maybe they just didn't care.
1 person likes this
@allyoftherain (7208)
• United States
28 Oct 10
Oh right. Suuuure. 
Only Hollywood flops don't typically get sequels. On the low-budget independent scene anything can happen. Maybe they just didn't care. Pretty likely.
Only Hollywood flops don't typically get sequels. On the low-budget independent scene anything can happen. Maybe they just didn't care. Pretty likely.
@inedible (768)
• Singapore
28 Oct 10
HAHAHAHAHA. Your description actually makes me sort of want to watch the movies to see how bad they are. And to see the unicorns. Dolphins are a type of unicorn, right? I didn't know Titanic was considered one of the world's worst disasters. Or were you calling the movie a disaster?
