Republicans top goal is to get rid of Obama
By KeenoT
@KeenoT (31)
United States
October 31, 2010 3:30pm CST
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said The single most important thing Republicans want to achieve is to insure that Obama is a one term President. Really? Not decrease unemployment? Not jump start the economy? Or some other way to help Americans? They just want Obama out? All our problems will magically disappear if Obama is gone? What are Republicans going to do when Obama is gone to help us Americans? All I know is they want to undo everything Obama has done but other than that I have heard no ideas they have to help the economy. Have you? They say they are against the stimulus but they are the first to stick their hand out to get a share. How much more would their states be hurting without it?
4 people like this
9 responses
@StarBright (2798)
• United States
1 Nov 10
Of course Republicans want full control again. Special interest groups need legislation repealed and laws passed that will support their greedy agenda and they can get back to sucking Americans dry. Special interest groups are willing to pay handsomely for the favor. The few hundreds of millions of dollars that go to lobbyists and politicians are but a drop in the bucket compared to the billions in profits that are drained from our American pockets.
How can anyone want to go back to the predatory credit card practices, having health insurance that can be refused or cancelled at the whim of a company that has taken your money for years, Do we really want to have the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act repealed? Do the American People not deserve clean air? One Republican candidate said Obama was being unfair to BP. What? The list goes on.
You are right, Keeno. Although there is much talk about taking back all of the progress that has been made in this past two years, we have not heard a plan for anything better - or a plan at all. There is talk about the constitution. But there is little said to lead us to believe that the people who want to argue and even change the constitution have a clue about what they are talking about. I would be surprised if some of these candidates can even name all 50 states without a cheat sheet.
2 people like this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
31 Oct 10
This is how haters think and, unfortunately, this is the only thing on their minds so there's no room in there for any kind of plans. Right now this kind of rhetoric is acceptable to them.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
1 Nov 10
So what's the difference between that and the Democrats who only cared about getting rid of either of the Bushes? Or Reagan?
If there is any purpose to our insane "two party" system, it to ensure "opposition in all things". Of course the Republicans want Obama out! Of course they want control of the House and the Senate. It's their job!
To question this is as rediculous as to wonder why one team doesn't want the other team to win the big game. Or why two men competing for the love of one woman doesn't want her to end up with the other one.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
1 Nov 10
That it their constitutional mandate and yes, their jobs. However, once in office, they aren't expected to answer to We the People anymore. They answer to the party represented by the little letter after their name.
Why? Because We the People aren't going to be the ones assigning (or passing them over) for key committee asignments where they get to play grinning ninny for the Speaker or Majority Leader. We the People don't get to decide who gets bribed with pork and who doesn't.
There is little opportunity to represent the home state or district when they "Caucus" as groups. When a few in each house of Congress get to wield authority that others don't, how on earth are the constituencies ever represented?
They've even gone so far as to get We the People to blame the President, while the President gets to blame Congress. Meanwhile neither care about their duties as defined by the US Constitution. In fact, they make fun of anyone who actually expects them to be competent.
So yes, "Their" job is "party uber alles", because career policians don't have to worry about the voters, as long as the party keeps We the People convinced that not supporting them is wasting our votes.. like we OWE our votes to their grinning ninnies.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
1 Nov 10
First of all, KeenoT, welcome to myLot. I hope you enjoy your time here.
Great discussion! The Republicans made it clear well over a year ago what their ultimate goal was when Jim DeMint said, "It will break him" referring to what he called the "Waterloo" of stopping health care reform. McConnell has reaffirmed that intent. I think everyone can rest assured that under GOP leadership nothing will even be seriously attempted to help the unemployed or to fix any other problems that face us. Why should they try to do their jobs for the American people when they can make sure everything stays as bad as it is or gets worse in the hopes President Obama will be blamed for it?
Annie
1 person likes this
@KeenoT (31)
• United States
3 Nov 10
Thanks Annie...Looks like the Republicans will have to do something now besides get in the way. They won't be able to blame everything on the Democrats. It may be to the Democrats benefit in 2012. Pretty similar to what happened in 1994 with Bill Clinton.
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
1 Nov 10
Well Republicans, you do that and let me know how it turns our for ya. Meanwhile, the new unconventional candidates can get to work and at the business of trying to do something productive in congress.
I see alot of people with an awefull lot of optimism for the results of a republican congress/ I can't for the life of me see why. All we'll be doing is sending one of the same two bunches of statists we have been for decades. Waht's the change?
The only hope is, as I said, the new unconventional candidates who are running under the republican banner (I realy wish they put their hatin another party's ring instead). And if the abyss of Washington swollows them too, well, they will be no better than the establishment republicans they ran against in the primaries.
1 person likes this
@ladybugmagic (3978)
• United States
1 Nov 10
Oh, x.
The voice of reason.
The only constitutionalist I will listen to.
The new unconventional candidates you speak of - you are not referring to Rand Paul, Sharron Angle, or Christine O'Donnell, (the worst of the unconventional) are you?
You know they haven't even read the constitution. Maybe Paul did, but the other two did not.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
1 Nov 10
Don't forget Ken Buck and Joe Miller, two more tea party favorites who went against the GOP establishment.
These five plus Sarah Palin have something else in common - they all think abortion should be outlawed including in cases of rape and incest. Sharron Angle described a teen girl being raped by her father and becoming pregnant as a "lemons to lemonade situation".
Annie
1 person likes this
@ladybugmagic (3978)
• United States
3 Nov 10
Biting finger nails. I don't think NV has been called yet.
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
1 Nov 10
The reason that is their number one priority is well they have no idea how to do the other things maybe give more money to the top 1% that seems to work... Oh wait Obama did that? Then well we will try it as well we have an R after our names.
The Republican/Democrats just need to reunite as well heck they are basically the same party. or as one of the local politicians here told me a two headed monster that is destroying this nation under a joint effort.
1 person likes this
@ladybugmagic (3978)
• United States
31 Oct 10
The republicans have no plans, outside of continuing to dumb down Americans and keep them in the dark and running in circles, and somehow masquerading all our problems as the democrats fault.
Mitch McConnell needs to be fired. He needs to do his work in congress.
1 person likes this