A Minute's Applause Or A Minute's Silence For The Dead?

@Janey1966 (24170)
Carlisle, England
November 13, 2010 8:24pm CST
I am most definitely in the camp of "a minute's silence" for dead people. For instance, earlier on Saturday we watched Carlisle play Southampton and - before the game started the whole of the ground (including the Southampton fans and all the players, officials, etc) observed a minute's silence for the war dead of World Wars I and II and subsequent wars after that. It was impeccably observed by everyone (and made me want to cry, which is what a silence is supposed to do) so it begs the question..why do some dead people have a minute's applause instead? I hate it! People can be quiet for a minute, it's not impossible. On BBC Radio Cumbria a guy called Derek Lacey used to commentate on Carlisle games for years. Unfortunately, he suffered a massive stroke and died last year before the season started. He had always maintained (in commentary) that he didn't like dead people being applauded as a mark of respect, he much preferred the minute's silence. At the time George Best had died and he thought it was in bad taste that everyone was applauding all over the country instead of paying their respects to George with a dignified silence...so what happened at Carlisle's ground the first game of the season after Derek's death? You guessed it! A minute's APPLAUSE, apparently requested by his daughter or something. I wasn't there at the time but John told me about it and he refused to applaud, just stood there with his head bowed as that's what Derek would've wanted. I would've done the same. Why can't the dead be respected in a minute's silence? What's this applause all about? I think it's extremely naff and should be banned forthwith. What are your views on this?
1 person likes this
5 responses
@2004cqui (2812)
• United States
14 Nov 10
I can only speak for myself. I would feel privileged and happy if anyone wanted to applaud my life on earth. But grieving people are sometimes very sensitive. It did affect only those who are alive.
@2004cqui (2812)
• United States
15 Nov 10
Ok, let me make myself perfectly clear. I believe our purpose on earth is only to make humanity better simply because we're in it. If you can honestly turn around, look at your life, find the world a better place because you were there, you have completed your task on earth. I this big celebrity did that, I would gladly applaud their life. So yes, I would if I knew they genuinely cared about others.
@hofferp (4734)
• United States
14 Nov 10
I think a moment of silence is more dignified. But if the deceased wishes applause, I'd respect their wishes.
@hofferp (4734)
• United States
15 Nov 10
I know and I agree the family was wrong.
@GardenGerty (160592)
• United States
14 Nov 10
I agree with you. I think often there is applause for people who have been media fixtures. It does not seem like it is as respectful to me, either.
14 Nov 10
Now I have to admit I am split on this. I have long upheld the tradition of a minutes silence to silently pay my respects and say thanks. But there are occassions where a minutes applause in a celebration of an individual life can be just as emotional in an out pouring of emotion. It all depends on the circumstances and wishes of those who it relates to.
@Janey1966 (24170)
• Carlisle, England
14 Nov 10
I think it's got to the stage whereby people are actually uncomfortable with being silent for one minute out of their busy lives..but I take your point..someone who has entertained or done good deeds throughout their lives probably would appreciate applause more. I dread the Queen popping her cloggs as I don't think she'd be amused at applause!
• Indonesia
14 Nov 10
personally I'll give a minutes applause. that's how I appreciate life. means I'm being grateful for all things I have achieved. and I believed grateful could multiply wealthness :)
@Janey1966 (24170)
• Carlisle, England
14 Nov 10
Each to their own my friend. Thanks for that and welcome to MyLot!