Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows part 1
By Jananipriya
@Jananipriya (4)
United States
November 18, 2010 7:01am CST
The part 1 of the film ends at the stage where the trio of Harry, Ron and Hermione Have found most of the horcrux and are ready to return to hog warts to find the diadem of ravenclaw, Harry knows that Lord Voldermort is also on way to Hogwarts, so the remaining is much smaller part than what has been covered in the 1st part, all Harry now has to do is go see the DA members with help of the Barman Dumbledore and go into the forest, die, but not die, come back and kill The Dark Lord or Tom Riddle, whatever you want to call him,
So why such uneven split and will the second part be shorter?
3 responses
@socialnet12 (9)
•
23 Dec 10
yea thats true they shoudve expanded the first part more but the better not ruin the last movie because the other movies werent so good
@TheAdvocate (2392)
• Philippines
20 Nov 10
I think the first part showed that they only found and destroyed the horcrux that Harry and Dumbledore recovered from the cave. The rest of the story concentrated on the Deathly Hallows and ended with Voldemort getting the elder wand in the hands of Dumbledore. That means that three horcruxes have been destroyed - the diary, the ring and the locket. There are four more that need to be destroyed and we all know which is the final horcrux.
I heard the cast saying that they put a lot of effort into the last battle in Hogwarts. That is probably the reason why it seems uneven to you.
@rinfour (250)
• Philippines
19 Nov 10
I don't think that the split was uneven. I just feel that greater detail would be put on the battle between Lord Voldemort. There wasn't much emphasis on fighting in the first part, but it would definitely be the focal point in the next and final installment.
