advancement
degradation
environmental
ethical
health
humans
nanotechnology
physical
science
societal
Nanotechnology: Advancement or Degradation of Human Race?
By oXAquaXo
@oXAquaXo (607)
United States
November 30, 2010 12:04am CST
For those of you who don't know, nanotechnology is the creation of technology at the atomical scale: basically, you're rearranging the atoms in materials to create new ones.
There has been much controversy over the use of nanotechnology: many people believe it may pose ethical and physical problems. These are divided into three main categories: societal, health, and environmental implications.
Many people believe that more and more people will be dependent on nanotechnology in the future, allowing it to take the jobs of humans, rendering the human race unnecessary. But nanotechnology has many potential benefits, like new medicines, creation of food for poor countries, etc. Do you think that nanotechnology would be worth it?
3 people like this
3 responses
@Professor2010 (20162)
• India
21 Aug 11
Thanks for sharing the details, i am aware of this, i have a PhD in Physics, all inventions have two sides, it depends how we utilize it.
Best of luck.
Professor
@CaptAlbertWhisker (32694)
• Calgary, Alberta
4 Jan 11
Screw Morality! I'm up for it, If it will make my life longer and make me more invulnerable to diseases, I wont mind mind having those tiny robots inside my body.I remember scientist were already developing tiny robots to be injected to a human body, those robots will kill cancers, restore blood circulation and fight diseases, they will run on our body's electrical charges.
@celticeagle (166761)
• Boise, Idaho
30 Nov 10
It could be. Technological advances are coming along so quickly that we need alot of help insuring that that continues at such a stagering rate. Sadly this is true.