New changes to upfront payments in Helium
By Arioch
@Arioch (190)
December 2, 2010 3:30pm CST
It looks like Helium are having a complete overhaul of the way there upfront payments as detailed on there forum http://www.helium.com/smf/index.php?topic=56532.0
What do other Helium writers think of it, will it work, will it make things better or worse on Helium?
It certainly looks like it may affect my earning potential on there.
1 person likes this
8 responses
@UmiNoor (4522)
• Malaysia
4 Dec 10
The first thing that came to my mind when I received the email Helium sent me regarding their latest change is that now I won't be able to gauge the income I might earn at Helium. Previously I can plan how many articles I need to write in order to earn a certain amount. Now it seems that earning at Helium would be uncertain just like any other writing sites I'm participating in.
3 people like this
@Sandra1952 (6047)
• Spain
4 Dec 10
Hello, UmiNoor. That's the main problem I have with the change. Helium's upfront payment system set it out from other sites - now earning is a lottery. I agree that standards need to be improved, but it strikes me the good writers will suffer more from this move. Still, I'd be happy to be proved wrong.
2 people like this
@Sandra1952 (6047)
• Spain
4 Dec 10
I don't like this move, either. However, as you say, Helium is still one of the better paying sites. I think Admin need to come up with a way to convince the consistent writers that they value their input, perhaps with the occasional incentive programme. Helium, are you listening to your loyal writers?
2 people like this
@Arioch (190)
•
4 Dec 10
I am in agreement even the best writers will suffer from this change as your intial upfront earnings will be down. Still it is one of the only writing sites to offer upfront payments. Though checking you now have to give them exclusive rights if submitted on the Market Place, so they are paying you $2 for an article with exclusive rights where previously I earned more per article with no exclusivity
1 person likes this
@Sandra1952 (6047)
• Spain
3 Dec 10
Hello, Arioch. I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, it should stop substandard writers churning out rubbish just to get the upfront payment. Those who write well will get paid well, and the fact that the articles for upfront payment are not rated solely by peer writers should allow the best articles to shine and earn well.
However, being the cynical old lady I am, I can only conclude that Helium have done this to save money, and I can't see more than a handful of Helium's best writers seeing an increase in income under the new system.
Obviously there's nothing we can do about it - we're in the hands of the gods at Helium. I still think it's one of the best writing sites on the internet, but I can see my earnings going down considerably.
2 people like this
@Sandra1952 (6047)
• Spain
4 Dec 10
Hello, UmiNoor. I agree that something needs to be done about poor writing on Helium, but I think this method punishes the consistent writers, such as ourselves, who write regularly for income. It's going to be a bit of a lottery from now on.
Still, I'm comfortable with writing for Helium, so I'll give the new system a chance. And they do say that if the system doesn't work, they'll change it. However, as it's going to mean Helium will pay out less, I can't see that happening.
2 people like this
@Arioch (190)
•
3 Dec 10
Yeah it does sound bad I mean I used to plan what articles I was going to suggest then write so all that will most likely go out the window now. Plus $2 minimum an articles is less then what you got for an empty title now if you had five stars which would have got you $3.50
1 person likes this
@Arioch (190)
•
4 Dec 10
It certainly does I have checked the new market place I will now earn $2 for a number one spot article and $1 for any other article that they except where previously I was making $2.50 or $3.50 for an empty title, plus I will now have to write to the titles that they suggest. And surely the star rating system was meant to help weed out the poorer writers on there anyway?
2 people like this
@jane239 (521)
•
10 Dec 10
It will be interesting to see how it goes. I haven't written for Helium for a while but I'm just starting to get an article ready for them.
I'm not sure I like the exclusivity idea. It would depend on how much the pay is. From what I can gather, that will vary and I don't think anyone should pay a few dollars and expect exclusive rights to something, the price ought to reflect the time and effort someone puts into their writing.
2 people like this
@sn_2818184 (328)
• Hong Kong
8 Dec 10
I have read the responses and I must point out that not only Helium can now pay less to the good writers, this new system also fail to raise the quality of writing. Ironically, this would even encourage poor writers to submit more rubbish.
In the past, due to the writing star system, you need to write a certain amount of articles before you can get a single writing star and start receiving upfront payment. This means poor writer will never get any upfront payment.
Now, as anyone can try submitting articles in marketplace, poor writers will just choose some title with no article submitted on the last day. Then, if their articles are able to barely pass the transition process, they are now receiving upfront payment! Even if the Helium editors are able to filter these articles out, this will no doubt increase the workload of them.
The changes is not totally negative, though.
First of all, I guess most of you have underestimate the power of passive income. Base on my experience, writing on a correct topic makes a huge jump in passive income. I am still making about US$1.00 every month with this article.
http://4656a09e.urlpulse.net
I am surely very green in writing as you can see from the article above. I still don't get my first writing star up to this moment. Yet, simply writing to a correct topic make a huge difference in my earning.
If Helium is able to point out title like the one above, I am sure the increase in passive income will be increasing much. So, let's wait and see Helium is capable to do this.
What's more, this changes is also encouraging more new writer to join Helium, as they can now start earning right after they join, instead of writing 20+ articles with no upfront payment. Therefore, although the new change may not help increasing the quality of the article, this will surely help increasing the number of quality article. (just in case if Helium is able to filter out the increasing number of rubbish article)
2 people like this
@Arioch (190)
•
8 Dec 10
Yes but depending what kind of articles you write to they offer a lower intial rate. I am a 5 star writer with around 600 articles so writing to an empty title would have earned me $3.50. Now with the changes for example in the hobbies and games section the average article gives $2 for the single best one they choose and $1 to everyone else. As it stands the passive income is the same currently with hints of them possibly making it better but nothing concrete at all.
I was also under the impression the editors did check every submitted articles as it was previously, people can still write to topics just with no upfront fee so there will still be articles that are rubbish on there. Just check out some of the stuff that appears on site like Triond (though of course there is lots of good stuff).
And to be honest since it will let 3 star writers (3 stars gives you the market place premier writer badge) now right to any article does that not effectively lower the standards as it is easier to get.
And the way I understand it you still have to have one star to gain the Market Place approved writer (and if you can get one star basically adding articles to 30 gets you 2 stars) this would have earned you $1 the amount you are currently most likely to get paid, $2 for an article to an empty title, so even new writers are losing out.
Still we can but watch and wait and see if the income from articles views increases as they have suggested and the quality of articles increases. Even so it is unpredictable, one of my best earning titles is a review for Deep Heat Rub of all things and other titles you presume would do well (for example World of Warcraft and Starcraft titles though of course competition is fierce) do not.
The other thing is the copyright issue any selected market place issue means you give the entire rights for the article to Helium leaving you unable to use it elsewhere, and depending on them to pass on any income earnt. Also remember there is a strong chance they will be paying you only $1 for that.
1 person likes this
@louierrific24 (1114)
• Philippines
2 Dec 10
I am disappointed with the recent changes. I'm earning around $350 a month from them -- enough money here in the Philippines to support my studies and save a little. Now, I am expecting 50% decrease in earnings. Do you know any writing site that pays upfront? I'm looking for new platforms and diversified earnings.
2 people like this
@RebeccaScarlett (2532)
• Canada
2 Dec 10
Will this take the focus off of stars, as upfronts will be based on ratings within a particular title rather than the number of stars you have? I know I won't worry so much about stars if they aren't affecting upfront income.
2 people like this
@UmiNoor (4522)
• Malaysia
4 Dec 10
From what I understand, writing stars are still important with regards to whether you get premium marketplace titles. Other than that I think now all writers can write to marketplace titles. Upfront payment is only applicable to these titles. And not everyone will earn. One writer would be chosen to earn the amount stated for the article and then there will be between two to five other writers who will get credit which will also depend on the quality of the articles submitted. Helium is now focusing more on quality rather than the fastest writer who is able to write within the first five articles to a title.
2 people like this
@babostwick (2036)
• United States
7 Dec 10
I don't know but I'm going to try it out and see what happens. Sure, I'll have a hit with my income but I'll find out if I make it up. Of course, I've had another hit and it wasn't because of the system but because of school. That's about it on that. I'm not going to bash the system but going to try to see if I can make it work to my advantage. Only then, I'll be able to give a definite answer. For now, it's simply I don't know.
2 people like this
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
3 Dec 10
Hi Arioch, I like the old system better.
The new system rewards the top writer and probably one or two more. The selection system is not that good too, especially for technical subjects. I bet many editors do not understand the technicality of the topic.
2 people like this