Government Employees Unions

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
December 13, 2010 11:03am CST
The purpose of Unions is to "protect" the workers against the power of management. In most cases, the union pits the workers against the management (hopefully) for a better income and benefits package. Government employees' unions are a bit different in that the government workers are paid by the taxpayers. When government employees go up against the employers, they are going up against every taxpayer in the country (state, or city)... including themselves. The Service Employees International Union is one of the most powerful unions in the US. The president of the SEIU is one of few people that Prs. Obama meets with almost weekly. Members of his own cabinet don't even get as much face time as Mary Kay Henry. Do we allow these special interest groups to raise our taxes and keep pushing for more, while we continue to make less? Does that make sense?
2 people like this
5 responses
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
13 Dec 10
The public unions are unique in that in business the stock holders or investors select management and the employees have no say in who makes up management. In public unions the employees have as much control over who is management as the stock holders (tax payers). Public Unions hold a unique positions because they control a large block of votes, similar to a group that owns a large percentage of the stock in a company can influence management decisions. As those who are employed by the government or receive government benefits reach 50% they become even more powerful. In many respects Public Unions are a conflict of interest.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
13 Dec 10
absolutely.
@terryt52 (243)
• United States
13 Dec 10
@ParaTed, this is a subject that really gets me going. Unions were designed for truck drivers, factory workers, etc. Unions do not belong in government and state job nor in our school systems. The states and government is broke because of all the nice little retirement packages that the unions have negotiate for them. Did any one ever look into their retirement package that they get never mind what they are paid while working. And they can do as they please because the union backs them up. Makes for us taxpayers to say uhmmmmmmm. None of it makes sense and no one can see that this is a huge part of why we are broke. I work for someone and her husband retired from the state at 55 years old, he gets 75%of his pay or more all his benefits. After he retired he went back and worked for the state while collecting retirement from the state. she is set for benefits if something were to happen to him. How can a state of country sustain all this expense. They Can Not. And yes seiu gets more time with OBAMA than anyone. I find this amazing. It all stinks.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
13 Dec 10
Isn't it ironic? The unions rose to power because the government refused to defend the rights of the workers.. now the most powerful union in the country defends the workers against the government. You're right, it makes no sense for "professionals" to be "unionized". It goes against the very basis of unionization.
@djbtol (5493)
• United States
14 Dec 10
And, just think of all the accusations by obama and company regarding Republicans and special interest groups. As usual, they went on and on about it, but as soon as they get a chance the democrats do the same thing, only to a larger extent. Now the law protects the workers, so there is no need for these unions. Who are they protecting now. Really, these unions are just padding their own pockets, except when they are screwing with other people.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Dec 10
Yes, I have to laugh every time I hear unions speaking out against "special interest groups" since that is what they are.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
16 Dec 10
Ted, this is a topic close to my heart! As a former letter carrier with the USPS I can tell you if anyone ever needed protection from management, it's postal workers, those who do the actual work rather than sit at a desk making up rules that make no sense whatsoever. However, it should be pointed out that postal workers' pay does NOT come from the taxpayers but from those who purchase their services. Contrary to popular opinion, postal workers and other federal employees don't have such fantastic benefits and yes, we do pay into Social Security, at least anyone hired after 1984 do. Annie
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
15 Dec 10
I support the right of workers to Unionize so I do support SEIU even though they have to be one of the biggest Unions I know of maybe the one I am a part of is bigger. I see the benefits of being a part of a Unionized work force but I can also see the draw backs to it as well. I personally think that there are more pros than cons to it but that is for the Union I am a part of. As you where getting at SEIU isn't protecting the workers from a For Profit Business as I think we can all agree the Government isn't a for profit establishment by any stretch of the imagination :). So why exactly are they Unionized what caused them to do so in the first place as most of the Unions like the Teamsters for Example started because of the conditions in Factories and other Hazardous work environments that exist in the work place that Employers weren't doing anything about and that is why they still exist in the Private sector in some areas extremely so. Some places are still Union Shops. So I have to say even though I support the workers rights to Unionize I am not sure if SEIU was needed at any time as the government is fairly good at paying its people and isn't good at getting rid of rotten eggs. As for the amount of time Obama spends with the Union Leader he kinda doesn't have a choice if they (SEIU) decide to strike on some issue then we will be paying for them to strike or at least SEIU will be paying them. I do think the government hasn't being doing its job in this as Unions generally have to argue with the Employer to get a contract hammered out and SEIU seems to get a fairly easy job at it with the Government not talking of losses or anything but just going okay yeah we will sign that contract that will lock the government in for several years 5 if it is the same contract that I am currently on. The Teamsters has to fight with my Employer and we make some compromises and so does my Employer. I personally like being Unionized and it helps keep the place I work at safe for me to work at. Also I know that I am protected from the company taking risks that will endanger my life or the lives of my coworkers so in some places I think unions are still very much needed in the private sector but not so sure my self about it being needed in the Public or non-profit sector of the Economy.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Dec 10
I generally support workers rights to unionize too, although I've always voted against unionization when I had the opportunity. The president of SEIU and Prs. Obama don't meet a couple of times a week to stave off a strike, or to secure better working conditions. Like many other special interest groups, SEIU advises Prs. Obama on how he can use the bully pulpit to get more money for SEIU. This money doesn't go to help the members of SEIU, it goes to pad the pockets of SEIU leaders. They do nothing but get more money from the taxpayers for use against the taxpayers. In the US, most government employees have no right to strike. Their benefits and pay are far above and beyond the average taxpayer doing similar work. The reason they became unionized was the unions saw that interest in union membership in the private sector was shrinking. Here in the US it dipped below 13% of the workforce. Including the government employees bolstered their numbers. On a side note, like I said, I generally respect the right of workers to unionize, but I resent the crap out of laws passed forcing workers to join unions. The monsters that got those laws passed care nothing for workers or rights, they only care about their little corrupt, piece of trash selves.
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
16 Dec 10
Yeah I think a worker should have the right to not be a member of a Union and I believe their is a federal Law on that very right that you can join a company where the workers are Unionized and not join it. I did join the Union at my employer and well they seem to be doing what I want them to do. Not sure about the National Organization but I know the Local that I am a part of is doing things that I like/support. As I said with SEIU I wasn't sure why they unionized as generally Unions have come out of the need for the workers to stick up for each others safety like Construction, Mining and other industrial jobs are Unionized but not sure about the dangers in a Office. Maybe tripping down the stairs?