Little Fockers
By Nadinest1
@Nadinest1 (2016)
Canada
December 29, 2010 8:28pm CST
We went to see the movie Little Fockers last night.
The story was fine enough, but I wondered why they even called it Little Fockers....the kids were hardly in the movie.
The funniest parts of the movie was what we see on the tv commercial.
I think it was worth me seeing, but there were quite a few things I had to wonder about.....1 being the name.
has anyone seen this movie? What are your unproffesional reviews?
11 responses
@Nadinest1 (2016)
• Canada
30 Dec 10
I am wondering if everyone was like me....liked the past movies, so this one should be great as well...but was disappointed after they saw the movie?
I thought my 14 year old son would enjoy it....with the kids humor(that I was expecting to see)....but I saw him stretching...checking his watch often. We also picked up my 20 year old son to go along.....he kept texting throughout the movie....of course this could be just what 20 year olds do at movies. I had issues with the little white screen catching my eye all the time while he was texting.....this could be another mylot discussion....people who don't turn off phones while at the theatre. lol
@annavi23 (6522)
• Philippines
30 Dec 10
hello nadinest! well,i have not seen the movie yet. but i can share my view about what is troubling your mind. well,there are movies or titles of novels or books even songs or poems which does not relate to the whole point of the content. even in here,mylot users don't always provide titles which has something to do with their contents. have you observed that? as i have known of the movie,fockers is the family name,right? so it might have something to do with little ones,which are children but the true meaning of the title is what you have to search yourself...
1 person likes this
@ErrollLeVant (4353)
• United States
30 Dec 10
They are just playing on the "suggestive" name of the series. I would not be surprised to see one come out with a focus on the Mother Fockers!
@carolscash (9492)
• United States
30 Dec 10
I haven't seen it but my daughter said that they went to see it and the theater was packed so they could not get tickets. I think that it will be funny just due to the cast, but I am surprised that the kids weren't a large part of the movie. I figured that it was based on things that they do and that they would be the most involved in the movie.
@Nadinest1 (2016)
• Canada
30 Dec 10
The theatre was packed the night we went as well. It was mostly about Ben Stiller and Robert DeNiro's characters.
@celticeagle (168256)
• Boise, Idaho
30 Dec 10
I haven't seen the movie and wouldn't pay good money to go. I think the name is rediculous and just a way to get the attention of the public. Stupidity sells now days. I am said to see some of the actors that actually lowered themselves to be in it. I can see one MAYBE but not a sequal of such idiocy.
@Nadinest1 (2016)
• Canada
30 Dec 10
Sequels are hard to pull off. They have to be better, funnier etc that the original movies....and most times sequels don't do that.....this sequel didn't do it either.
1 person likes this
@hardworkinggurl (37063)
• United States
30 Dec 10
I have not and stand with my opinion that they have gone a bit to far to continue the sequels.
I think the first one was good, then the second was not all that so after seeing a few clips I think I will fore go and wait for it on DVD rental. As I thought that would happen that the little ones would not be seen and it truly was about the two men continuing to be in the public eye.
Thanks for sharing and I will watch your discussion to see if perhaps I am wrong and it might be worth seeing sooner.
@Hatley (163776)
• Garden Grove, California
30 Dec 10
hi again I have not seen this movie as I am in the US and maybe it has not hit our states yet. I dislike the implication of that word fockers
but that maybe just my elderly suspicious mind at play there.
I am sure its a good movie though and wish It would come someplace close where I could go see it
.
.
@dorannmwin (36392)
• United States
2 Jan 11
I was supposed to go see it today with my mother and my sister, but my mother is suffering from a sinus infection and was afraid to go out of the house today, so I think we are going to give it a try tomorrow. In other words, I really can't give my own unproffesional review yet. However, I will say that I don't really expect it to be as funny as the first two because movie series like this tend to go downhill after the first couple of movies.
@stephmanimbao (268)
• Philippines
30 Dec 10
I want to watch this movie but it is still not showing here in the Philippine. I like the first two of the sequel. I hope I won't be disaapointed with the third.
@Nadinest1 (2016)
• Canada
30 Dec 10
We have seen the 1st 2 movies as well on tv and thoroughly enjoyed them, but this one wasn't as great for me.
@didi13 (2926)
• Romania
30 Dec 10
"Little Fockers" - A visionary nightmare That film, like the world ...Do you think that big players are capable of anything? That may remove the jewelry,even the most stupid roles?That their presence is enough to save even the most inept movies ...?If you want to see what a plight may be foolish actors like Robert De Niro,Dustin Hoffman, Barbra Streisand,Blythe Danner, Laura Dern, Harvey Keitel - plus others, go see this new episode useless and trivial, a fool outrageous taste, which do not preserve anything quite questionable humor anyway, but at least fresh, the two sides earlier.
