Do you agree?

I strongly believe that the parliament members of our country excepting a few have no headache for the interests of the people who send them to the parliament, rather they are interested in doing their own betterment as well as benefits of their family members and friends.

Dear rifnee, Not fully agree with you but ya mostly. I think members working at parliament think about people because they have to be in parlament again so they think that if they will do something for them then only there is a chance to came again. But ya mostly they use there power and just enjoy there membership power. Thanks

If justice is only for the rulers and the rich only, the people under the more oppressed by them and do not expect this country going forward. The conflict that will probably happen here and there. O rulers are there you see a big down there because there are those. not only used as a complement to happiness over misery

flashback moment ... if we see the Suharto era, suppose that the Indonesian government is the pendulum clock, pendulum and the time it was heavily biased on the executive. all the authorities that govern everything, and so forth. and now, the pendulum was the middle of hovering skewed in the legislature. other words we can see, why all want to be a member of the House, want to be a member of the legislature, because it is considered very good and his will to be obeyed. nothing if the House does not agree, not so because it Alm. Gus Dur had hinted loudly that the House is like a kindergartner who whine here and there if it wants not obeyed. Not me commented that tend to criticize the House, it's just that their image in the eyes of the people are like that, like what else? represent the people? they want to choose just had a desire to satisfy their egos, as well as our circumstances that watching TV and remarked that obviously different when we experience them or are in the field. that's what happens to those who sit in the legislature kursi2. It is quite possible there are really side with the people or actually have the name as it is called "House of Representatives", just that the House of Representatives consists of a lot, and a dominant win ... if we see reality, certainly we can see , where a dominant win. Therefore, many are neglected, as is easy to switch to another concentration. prioritize what they want rather than parliament and the public. from there to our own values.

What they want is: seeking power and influence due to enter in the parliament with the least they can be made, determine the policy to be issued by the government with regard to the interests of the person for instance: the legislative background of the candidate they want to how the company entrepreneur (business) advanced camp by looking at opportunities, and existing government policies, make laws for employers to take sides on who should own a business in parliament clincher.

Parliament is not a reflection of people's representatives, but representatives of the party who obtained the material results in more donated to the party, so that the next period is selected again. The problem is if you do not select a candidate member of the council, the MUI is considered unlawful. Speech chairman of the House should not be heard, which would represent the Party building (mud disaster in Sidoarjo, if not touched disaster will not happen, but once the disaster is considered extraordinary natural disaster is great .... the way of thinking members of the Board,,, (but they are also not our choice, we mean the wrong choice or the wrong constituencies.)

Hi Gengeni, Both Rifnee & Gengani are the same?! Yes, the referral comes form Gengani, so it is confirmed. Could be - In the Parliament, all the parties are there. As the ruling party are the headed one, most of the parliament members are there to discuss the administrative matters. All the Parliamentarians are not intended to power and money, but all the Parties are meant for the both, services to the public is the least, we should say from the experiences. Thank-s