When are they going to get this started?
By lilwonders
@lilwonders456 (8214)
United States
January 24, 2011 8:12am CST
It is almost the end of January. I have only seen ONE exploritory committee officially filed. No one has officially thrown their hat in the ring. What gives? Let's get this party started already. I really thought it would have started by now. What do you think they are waiting for? I am tired of the speculations. I want to KNOW who is going to run. How about you?
3 people like this
6 responses
@hofferp (4734)
• United States
24 Jan 11
I'm kind of glad no one has. Once they do, there will be nothing else in the "news" until November 2012. If I were thinking about running, I'd hold off for as long as possible...why give the media/pundits/etc. anymore time to trash you and your family/friends than you have to?
1 person likes this
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
24 Jan 11
Oh I expect them to wait longer to formally put their hat in the ring. But I really thought we would have started to see more exploratory committees by now.
But so far I have only seen one formally filed. I at least want to know who is seriously thinking about starting the process. It takes time to put a campaign together and it all usually starts with an exploratory committee.
Guess we will have a late start this time around.
1 person likes this
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
24 Jan 11
Herman Cain has filed for the committee. But so far he is the ONLY one. Oh I think this primary is going to be FULL of candidates. I think ALOT are going to throw their hat in the ring.
1 person likes this
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
24 Jan 11
Mike Huckabee said something about the end of summer to decide if he's running. So that might when a lot of them are planning to make announcements. Romney is still polling pretty high from what I have heard so far. He's probably going to run. I doubt Sarah Palin will. (My personal opinion, she should wait till 2016.)
1 person likes this
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
24 Jan 11
It would still put them all behind. Personally, I think they should have started in January.
1 person likes this
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
24 Jan 11
End of summer will put him behind in my opinion enless they ALL decide to wait that long. Which will mean a somewhat shorter primary cycle. Which could be bad or good. Depending.
1 person likes this
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
24 Jan 11
I really thought the exploratory committees would have started in January. I don't expect anyone to make a formal announcement til later....but it seems some have not even gotten the ball rolling yet. I don't see this as a good thing.
1 person likes this
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
24 Jan 11
Herman Cain has filed for a committee. Who knows if he will decide to run after that. He is going to have name recognition issues to overcome. Especially against better know established candidates. Personally I don't know that much about him...so I will hold off my opinion of him until I learn more.
Before too much longer they are going to have to make a decision. By April at the latest.
2 people like this
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
24 Jan 11
He is new. No one really knows a lot about him. He is really going to have to work hard to get people to know who he is and consider him. Especially if some bigger more well known names jump into it.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
29 Jan 11
Since you first posted this discussion I've heard and read several theories as well as the opinions of some of the potential candidates as to why they're waiting so long and whom it may benefit. Except for the things the perspective candidates said themselves, it might just be a bunch of BS...lol!
Rick Santorum said the slow start to the campaign could help him...personally, I think his Presidential aspirations are beyond help. According to polls here he couldn't even win back his Senate seat if he tried as of now. Rudy said he may be more likely to run if Palin runs, which I don't quite get his reasoning there unless he thinks her far-right extremism may make him seem more moderate and therefore more attractive to voters. I've also read, I forget just where, that Fox News may be encouraging the perspective candidates to wait to announce presumably because they have so many potential candidates on their payroll and they'd have to resign as soon as they announce. They BETTER have to resign as soon as they announce, I think there should be a clause that they can't have appeared as pundits within so many months of campaigning for office themselves. Remember the uproar when there was talk of some on the left wanting Ed Schultz to run for Senate? The same thing happened when there was speculation that Chris Matthews may seek Arlen Specter's seat. Neither were even seriously considering it, it was just talk in the media that they should, yet the right jumped right on it!
Annie
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
30 Jan 11
That is exactly what Rudy is thinking. Palin makes him look moderate. But honestly with how poor of a showing he had last time I don't know why he throw his hat in the ring again. According to polls with the RNC (for what htey are worth) the big three so far are Romney, Huckabee and Paul. I really think Romney and Huckabee will end up throwing their hat in....still out on Paul. I hope he throws his hat in but he just got chair on two big committees that he has wanted for a long time and I don't see him giving them up to become president. But he is getting a lot of preasure to run so we have to see how that shakes out.
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Jan 11
Herman Cain is the one that I have heard about but I think that Santorum and Gingrich may be putting out feelers in a quiet way while Michelle Bachmann showed up in Iowa to get tongues wagging about her possible intentions. No one seems to be making a commitment. In a way, it might be a good move. Keep the media guessing and they won't have as much time to try to smear you and create an image for you in the minds of voters. Seeing the way the media has gone after other people when they ran for office, and continues to dog them even when they are not running for anything, I don't think I would be too quick to throw myself to the hungry hounds myself.
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
24 Jan 11
Mike Huckabee said he is waiting and will not get "suckered" into early debates which he seems to think the media wants just to boost their ratings. He is probably right.
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/24/huckabee-says-to-count-him-out-of-early-debates/
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
24 Jan 11
Huckabee doesn't stand a chance....he is just waiting to see who runs to see how much publicity he can get off a run.
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
24 Jan 11
Yeah I can understand not formally putting yourself out there. But I would have thought more would have put in for exploratory committee by now. It does not mean they are going to run...just that htey are thinking of running.
Until I see exploratory committees I don't take them seriously as a candidate. Sure they can play around the issue to get press...but they only form the committe if they are serious.
2 people like this
@Adoniah (7513)
• United States
24 Jan 11
They are all to scared to run...wouldn't you be? It will take a totally arrogant bull to run this time. The "Big 0" is sure he will win again so he is going to intimidate the hell out of any democrats who want to run. Any Republicans will have to face some tough issue just to run against him. I sure would not want to try it. Of course I'm not a crook so I wouldn't run for office anyway...lol
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
25 Jan 11
Lil, you're wrong about that. If someone wanted to challenge President Obama for the Democratic nomination they have every right to do so. You were just a little child but Ted Kennedy challenged Jimmy Carter in 1980 and that was believed to have weakened him greatly. It hasn't happened in the Democratic party since but that doesn't mean it can't.
Annie
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
24 Jan 11
"he is going to intimidate the hell out of any democrats who want to run"
Umm...the democrats can't run. The way it works is the sitting president if he eligible for another term gets first choice. If he wants to run again...he gets to no questions asked...no one is allowed to run against him in a primary. If he decides not to...only then can other candidates from the same party throw their name out there for the job.
Obama is going to run for a second term...so therefore no democrat can run against him unless they go third party.
As for the Republicans....I don't think it has to due with "fear". I think in the end the party will end up with ALOT of people running in their primary. I think they want a shorter primary for strategic reasons.
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
25 Jan 11
Thanks Annie....I did not realize that.
1 person likes this