Interesting pt2
By tessah
@tessah (6617)
United States
3 responses
@sparkofinsanity (20471)
• Regina, Saskatchewan
27 Jan 11
LOL.
I really don't understand the mind set of the store.
Most kids seeing a picture of a man holding a baby with another man looking over his shoulder wouldn't automatically jump to the conclusion that it was a gay couple. Like, have they never seen a man holding a baby before? To draw attention to the photo by trying to hide it is just stupid. Does the store think that showing such a picture is going to cause every child who comes into their store to question the sexuality of every man they see with a baby from then on? I think not.
@tessah (6617)
• United States
27 Jan 11
sparrrrrrrrX!!!! *tackles* and yes.. i agree with you too. so just cause a man holds a child and someone sees em.. itll automatically make them gay, so hurry quick cover the picture! gimme a break. if anything, thisll also fuel that stupid fire of men thinking it makes them less manly to tend to their own children
1 person likes this
@sparkofinsanity (20471)
• Regina, Saskatchewan
27 Jan 11
With the state of society today and the total breakdown of the permanence of the 'nuclear family', to see two men, or two women with a child that is obviously loved and cherished is a beauty all it's own and should be celebrated not censored. Drawing negative attention to the sexuality behind the family groups we see today is counter productive on so many levels. I've know a lot of gay family groups over the course of my lifetime, and I gotta say, in my experience, once a gay couple commits to having children, their track record in terms of longevity keeping the family together is much better than the traditional mom and pop and 2.5 kids scenario.
