to continue or not

American Samoa
February 14, 2011 10:35pm CST
we humans have given a lot of time to decide. it is whether we continue to live and change and make way back to our nature or just meet the end. I really don't understand why some people are still hooked into industrialization and stuff which destroys our MotherEarth... they think black and grey not green and blue. So, if you were to answer the question., would you continue to connect to our nature or destroy it and move on to the desired future life?
2 people like this
8 responses
DawGwath
@DawGwath (1042)
• Romania
15 Feb 11
If there weren't so many people around maybe we wouldn't need all this industrialization. So maybe when we'll stop reproducing at such high rates, we'll produce less stuff and pollute less of our precious Earth.
uchihaseymour
@uchihaseymour (1025)
• American Samoa
3 Mar 11
the wants and needs of humans are also increasing! with those industrialization comes and the effect would be slight destruction or worse destruction to our precious Earth T^T... thanks for the response~!
1 person likes this
beamer88
@beamer88 (4259)
• Philippines
15 Feb 11
In my opinion, with our current world population, forsaking industrialization and just continue to connect with nature, as you put it, would have also a negative impact on humankind. I feel that without the intervention of man, nature's resources would not be enough for all of us. Well, as it is, it might not be enough but we could use technology to make it sufficient. I still feel that industrialization and stuff are not the evils. It's our irresponsible use of them as well as our bloated population that may be the culprit. On the other hand, I also feel that in order to save the planet, the number of our species should be drastically lowered if not entirely eradicated. A very awful thought but we are the ones who have caused the most damage.
uchihaseymour
@uchihaseymour (1025)
• American Samoa
3 Mar 11
we humans have become to populous and still continues to increase our count... yes, that's the sad part, we need to make sacrifices to have this world be stabilized. i dont want to see many people die too due to hunger. slight industrialization is good but greed for power and money? that's nonsense, thanks to those people it gives much more pain to more people across the world. thank you for the response~
sender621
@sender621 (14894)
• United States
15 Feb 11
If we don't push forward and make way for a change in our lives, then we have little to hope for. doing nothing will not bring a difference to the world or to what we call life.
mark98
@mark98 (567)
• China
15 Feb 11
No matter how our lives will continue. I think one day we can really deal with nature.
semus9x
@semus9x (47)
• Vietnam
15 Feb 11
The Nature is human's life. Destroy the nature is destroy all the people. So We have to protect the nature and all the things belong to nature.
Bipolargandolf
@Bipolargandolf (9)
• United States
15 Feb 11
your just assuming that industrialization would destroy the earth
bird123
@bird123 (10643)
• United States
15 Feb 11
Industrialization is not the problem. It's greedy people who want something for nothing. They want to manufacture the cheapest way possible without regard to anything else. It can all be done without pollution. It just takes a bit more work.
rebel_woman06
@SIMPLYD (90722)
• Philippines
15 Feb 11
Who wouldn't want a greener mother earth? It's just that some people's dream have to become a realization, so that's why industrialization of some places happens. We just have to accept that, but we could also do our part of greening mother earth. We could plant trees on our areas or on the foot of hills or in the hill itself. If all of us will do it, we could revive the green mother nature.