today is the 99th anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic
By cher913
@cher913 (25782)
Canada
7 responses
@nelerkz (467)
• Philippines
31 May 11
I really look forward the second movie and its 3D, I love it. Titanic is one of my favorite movie and everybody should watch it. Thank you for this information, hope this remake will be much more excellent than the old one.
I'm so excited with this remake, I can't wait for it.
God bless to you! :-D
@KrauseHome (36448)
• United States
3 May 11
100 yrs. since the sinking of the Titanic. Quite interesting, and who would have ever thought it could be this long. And hard to believe it has been since the 90s when this movie was made and so popular. It will be interesting if they can do a 3d version of this movie, and wonder if they will use some of the same people from the other one?
@writersedge (22563)
• United States
25 Apr 11
Strange how people can't seem to get enough of the Titanic. I went to the traveling Titanic mini-artifact museum when it was in Boston ( happened to be in Boston with a friend anyway).
@ANTIQUELADY (36440)
• United States
14 Apr 11
I didn't realize it had been that long. Thanks for the update.
@Nadinest1 (2016)
• Canada
14 Apr 11
3D would be awesome. Both of my boys (now aged 20 and 14) were amazed by the Titanic movie. My oldest boy would buy book on it and from the library. I will mention the 99th anniversary to my youngest son and talk about how cold it must have been for the people in the frigid waters on this day 99 years ago.
Thanks for sharing.
@much2say (55668)
• Los Angeles, California
27 Apr 11
The sinking of the Titanic has always "intrigued" me ever since I learned about it. Yes, it happened long ago, but we're still going on about it - it was so tragic! I've always imagined what it must have been like to be aboard the Titanic that night . . . geez, and I don't even swim well at all . . . it must have been hella scary to say the least. Eek - I don't know if I want to see that movie in 3D - it's a movie that captured me internally as it was - no need for me to see it in 3D.
@Hatley (163776)
• Garden Grove, California
14 Apr 11
hi cher why not just a better version without the damned 3D a lot of use who wear glasses cannot use the stupid 3 d glasses. I cannot see at all
wearing those things. why not just reissue the extremely good original
movie instead. I imagine a lot of people would still come and see
it even if they had seen it before. well worth seeing again.
If I can see it with better 3 D glasses I will see it but otherwise
no. I would love to see the original over again. wish they would
do that as I bet a lot of other mylotters have wished that too.