Is it acceptable to ask controversial questions to make money?
By RebeccaLynn
@RebeccaLynn (2256)
United States
8 responses
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
• United States
19 Nov 06
Not only do I feel there is someone doing that, asking controversial questions, they are pretending to misunderstand people's answers, get angry and incite even more anger. All of which leads to more and more responses.
No, it is not acceptable or even a right thing to do. However, as long as people continue to fall for it, there will be people do it.
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
• United States
19 Nov 06
Yep, we are not the only ones catching on either. The tip off for me was when I realized that he was not consistent over time with his positions. He also sometimes was intelligent. And as you say, no one could be that dense.
There is more, but why go into it? Among your friends in private emails, continue to warn them not to even respond to this guys' posts. It is a con and a waste of time.
1 person likes this
@RebeccaLynn (2256)
• United States
19 Nov 06
I completely agree. I decided last night not to read or respond to his posts anymore. His extremes are just too much.
I read every thread he started. "Inconsistent" is the key word here. Which is why I feel strongly that it is just a ploy to make money...and perhaps enemies.
@RebeccaLynn (2256)
• United States
19 Nov 06
AAAAhh, so you've run into him too?
I am honestly begining to think that it is his way--and a clever one at that--of making money.
I don't believe anyone could be that dense unless they are mentally unstable.
But as you said, as long as people respond, it will undoubtedly continue.
@emeraldisle (13139)
• United States
11 Feb 07
Well I think a lot of it has to do with how they ask and why. There are some that will post an inflamatory discussion about a controverial question. One designed to anger people, not one to make them think or discuss, just to react. That I don't think they should do. Now one that is controversial that is done right, set up to provoke thinking, debating, insight, those are ones that should be posted. It is a fine line and can be hard to tell at times using the written word to determine one's posting tone but that doesn't make it impossible.
1 person likes this
@RebeccaLynn (2256)
• United States
12 Feb 07
I should have clairified. I am talking about the discussions that are posted to deliberately anger people.
Discussions that imediatley slam another persons religion, country, morals, etc.
I've seen quite a few since I joined and it aggravates me to no end!
Now, I realize that these discussions get people so fired up that the poster ends up with pages and pages of responses, therefor is getting paid, but I don't think it's right.
@sailoffwithme (870)
• United States
20 Nov 06
Yes thats the best thing you can do here!
1 person likes this
@RebeccaLynn (2256)
• United States
20 Nov 06
"nuff said. I read some of your' threads...
my sister is single and looking.
@burn123 (116)
• Romania
19 Nov 06
I completely agree. I decided last night not to read or respond to his posts anymore. His extremes are just too much.
I read every thread he started. "Inconsistent" is the key word here. Which is why I feel strongly that it is just a ploy to make money...and perhaps enemies!!!!
@RebeccaLynn (2256)
• United States
19 Nov 06
Do you have your' own thoughts or would you like to borrow some more of mine?
@RebeccaLynn (2256)
• United States
11 Feb 07
As long as you are helping people, I don't have an issue with it. I think we should all help each other. Keep it up!
@RebeccaLynn (2256)
• United States
19 Nov 06
While I agree to a certain extent, I think there are lines that just shouldn't be crossed. Personal attacks, for instance, because it keeps a thread going, in my humble opinion are wrong.
@ashuaaaaa (783)
• Germany
19 Nov 06
i think its right. aim is to discuss. and if more people participate more lively is the discussion.
1 person likes this
@RebeccaLynn (2256)
• United States
19 Nov 06
I suppose that's true. But do you think that the more inflammatory the question, the livelier the discussion?