Can you really appreciate SHAKESPEARE?

@vesuvius (1677)
Philippines
May 11, 2011 6:29am CST
This discussion is not just about Shakespeare but classic literature in general. When I watched an episode of "Justice" by Michael Sandel, one part showed a class votation on basic human preferences related to pleasure and utility. There came the idea that more people preferred viewing a not-so-decent clip from the Simpsons than seeing something that is of Shakespeare (guess that was a movie adaptation of Hamlet or something). In truth, I can't recall having read any literary masterpiece by a popular classical icon like Shakespeare. My readings include only those books of newer generations like those by JK Rowling, Dan Brown and Sidney Sheldon and I am guilty of not knowing much about classical literature to it's deepest detail. On the same show there were points raised about the idea that some people might just be saying they do appreciate Shakespeare (and related stuff) because our minds were conditioned to interpret these things to be what is good, regardless of our real opinion - that is, when it's Shakespeare, you have to say it's great. I can't answer much of my own query because as I mentioned I don't have anything much in my mind about classics. So how about you? Can you really appreciate Shakespeare, or any classical literature?
1 person likes this
8 responses
11 May 11
No he had ADHD.
@dream_ozn (1754)
• Singapore
11 May 11
You mean shakespears had ADHD?
11 May 11
Yes I do
@dream_ozn (1754)
• Singapore
11 May 11
I literally hated Shakespeare. When i was in high school, there was a class on literature which I had to take for 2 years. That 2 years for me was pure torture. I didn't understand most of the literatures and definitely have problem answering questions. Luckily at the end of 2 years, we had the choice whether to continue or not. Shakespeare if i'm not wrong uses old english, and this is one I really cannot make any sense out of it. I would study anything else to do Shakespeare!!
@vesuvius (1677)
• Philippines
11 May 11
Wow that's intense. Maybe the wrong thing there is that the education system in your school tried to forcefully inject the classics into you all. If it were me I'd like to make the classics a some sort of an elective, that taking it is optional because other choices are available. But probably it's in your law so my preferences won't serve just right.
@dream_ozn (1754)
• Singapore
11 May 11
Definitely. I had spent four years in high school. Literature was made into an elective after the end of the 2nd year. During our 3rd and 4th year, people who were interested can take it as an elective if they wanted. For me, i ran as far away as i could! haha
@visavis (5934)
• Philippines
11 May 11
Actually my friend never read or try any book of shakespeare, I just seen few of his work through movies... sorry..
@vesuvius (1677)
• Philippines
11 May 11
That's ok. As I've said I haven't either so you're not alone my friend.
• Philippines
11 May 11
To tell you the truth, I don't but I try. Shakespeare is, in my opinion, one of the greatest writers in the world. Whether he did write his plays, sonnets and everything is always up to debate but I think the Shakespearean writing reveals as much humanity can be in the particular era that it was written. I am a prolific reader but even the archaic language and style can turn me off. Like you, I'm not much of the classics fan (unless somebody does the world a favor of simplifying the classics without ruining their meaning) but I try to read and appreciate them somehow. Maybe becuase they are the classics and I consider as the cornerstone of every reading endeavor. Reading the classics forces me to go beyond the meaning, even though the effort is very difficult, most especially for the contemporary reader. The contemporary use of language in reading today makes the meaning plain and easier, making them appreciative by contemporary readers. if we then we read the classics, we feel that our brains are beginning to burst. It's a common rpoblem - appreciating the classics but they are called classics for a reason. They are timeless and the lessons they impart are also like that. I can appreciate Shakespeare or any of his tribe to a certain extent but I cannot claim wholly. I guess that is a challenge for people who try to study the classics itself.
@vesuvius (1677)
• Philippines
11 May 11
I believe there is in fact a some sort of "classic-to-contemporary" literary style converter publishing. I found copies of simplified copies of Shakespeare in the National Bookstore here, in the Philippines. I found it interesting that there was this sort of book editions that tend to link the gap between deep literary pieces to the straightforward methods of literature today. However, I cannot be sure of how accurate the transformations are.
• United States
12 May 11
I honestly enjoy Shakespeare! I think because it is so difficult to understand for the most part I enjoy the challenge. I have a few of his plays. I can't wait till my daughters get a little older so I can read some of his more popular works with them. I just hope they enjoy it as much as I do. Shakespeare is not for everyone!
@didi13 (2926)
• Romania
17 Jun 11
To trust in the intelligence of the other, the one you read. Are giving to them by what you write, a few scattered hints in writing, which reveals to them alone. To offer him a mixture of elements from which to choose what he wants to understand or feel. For literature to be impregnated with the thought, should give food for thought, he must incite the reader to build himself and other configurations of the text. Because literature is not only amorphous substance of which must burst sound thinking. For it offers us only the simplest thing possible, we find ourselves. If a person moves, speaks, interacts with another person, grab something that triggers in him a wave of emotions, memories and regrets, we can say that we are dealing with a perfect story, the one who says it story is a special person, endowed with an amazing talent as a writer. But if you go through the ear narrative storyteller excited to hear your voice, then of ourselves there were only a wall of sound that break a mirror that reflects someone else's words without leaving us to think we need to capitalize on ourselves and not only that we should find life image of a fictional narrator, not only that we should identify with a character or another. Literature, today, needs this increase need to think. We would do well therefore to try to fully realize the obligation to write, and more to think about writing. Trying to muster on us and we fully realize the absolute necessity of putting thought into the letter. Will not be easy. We have many obstacles to the past ...
@lazybug (273)
• Philippines
12 May 11
Classical literature is the epitome of intelligence. It is shear brilliance because you have to decipher what it is they are telling you and when you finally realize the message you would say they are right. It is so fascinating that it gets your mind riled up and your brain begins to function.
• Philippines
12 May 11
no. got a headache once i begin to read one :)
@sender621 (14894)
• United States
11 May 11
The works of william shakespeare are unique in their words and their style. it takes a true heart of the Shakespearean times to appreciate their worth. just because the words are different doesn't make them timely.