Non Christians and the Christian Life
By bestboy19
@bestboy19 (5478)
United States
10 responses
@Galena (9110)
•
15 May 11
not at all.
a person should live by their principles.
if I know that someone beleives certain things to be right, but doesn't strive to acheive them in life, whether those values are the same as mine or not, I consider them to be not trying hard enough.
I was raised Pagan, in a family with a long history of Paganism.
one of the things that was tought most strongly was about honour, the strength of your word, your Oath and your honour.
I was raised to believe that I should do what I beleive is RIGHT. even when it is not easy.
when I see a Christian who doesn't live by their Christian values, even though those values are not my own, I beleive that they are betraying their own honour in not aspiring and striving to meet those standards they beleive to be right.
1 person likes this
@Galena (9110)
•
17 May 11
I don't entirely understand.
if they feel that the values taught in Christianity are values that should be lived by, and feel that from a moral rather than a religious perspective, of course they should live by them.
I am not an Asatruar, but I strive to live by the nine noble virtues of Asatru. when I first read them I was struck by how VALUABLE that code was. to try and live by those values makes me a better person. I may not be worshipping norse Gods, but their nine noble virtues are a very morally sound framework. I admire those values, and seek to cultivate them in myself.
Courage
Truth
Honour
Fidelity
Discipline
Hospitality
Self Reliance
Industriousness
Perseverance
there are some where I feel I lack a bit. but I strive for it.
and I do think that if you believe something to be morally right, be that from a basic moral point of view or a religious one, and don't try as hard as you can to do it, then that isn't right.
do what is right. even if it is not easy.
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
17 May 11
What about the person who puts value on Christianity but is himself not a Christian? Should he also live those values?
@Gordano (795)
• United States
15 May 11
First, you need to define what a Christian life mean, considering the fact that Jesus said that He was sent ONLY to the lost sheep of the house of Israel [Matthew 15:24] But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. and when Jesus had chosen his twelve disciples He commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. as written in [Matthew 10:5-6]
Christianity according to Jesus is All about adherence to to the Law [Matthew 5:17-19]
(17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
(18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
(19) [i]Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
[/i]
and also in [Luke 10:26]
He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?
but when you read the new testament you will find that Paul preached outside Israel conflicting with the command of Jesus above, furthermore Paul was not one of the twelve disciples chosen by Jesus, and Paul have his own views about the Law which also conflict with Jesus, we can easily find out that Paul is against the Law.
[i][b]"But now we are Delivered form the Law" (Rom 7:6)
"A man is not justified by works of the Law, but by faith f Jesus Christ" (Gal. 2:16)
"For as many as are of the works of the Law are Under the Curse" (Gal. 3:10)[/b]
[/i]
as you can see, the Law according to Jesus is a Must, while the Law according to Paul is a Curse, and thus, you need to identify which "Christian life" you are talking about?
What say you?
@Gordano (795)
• United States
17 May 11
I don't buy the story mentioned in Acts 9 and the the twelve disciples were chosen by Jesus himself, with the command not to preach outside Israel.
and the Law was not created to disappear but it was created to remain, Till heaven and earth pass.
the covenant between God and Abraham is everlasting, but Paul canceled it in Galatians 5:2 saying:
Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.
while the Bible is obvious and clear that it is everlasting covenant, or do you think that the word everlasting is there to decorate the verse?
Genesis 17:9-13
(9) And God said unto Abraham, Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations.
(10) This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised.
(11) And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.
(12) [i]And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed.
[/i]
(13) [i]He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.
[/i]
It should be noted that the Law in included in Islam, circumcision is a Must in Islam, both Muslims and Jews follow the Law, Jesus himself commanded adherence to the Law, and therefore a real Christian is supposed to follow the Law, and thus Paul is a deceiver.
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
17 May 11
Jesus instructions to the twelve was before his crucifixion and resurrection which is what was accomplished in the law that was mentioned in Matthew 5:18. Christ was the perfect sacrifice that ended the animal sacrifices that only rolled sins over until the next year.
(18) "I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."
Paul was specifically chosen by Jesus to tell the Gentiles about salvation through Jesus.
Acts 9:15-17,19-22
(15) But the Lord said to Ananias, (about Saul soon to become Paul)"Go! This man is my chosen instrument to carry my name before the Gentiles and their kings and before the people of Israel.
(16) I will show him how much he must suffer for my name."
(17) Then Ananias went to the house and entered it. Placing his hands on Saul, he said, "Brother Saul, the Lord-Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as your were coming here-has sent me so that you may see again and be filled with the Holy Spirit."
(19) Saul spent several days with the disciples in Damascus.
(20) At once he began to preach in the synagogues that Jesus is the Son of God.
(21) All those who heard him were astonished and asked, "Isn't he the man who raised havoc in Jerusalem among those who call on this name? And hasn't he come here to take them as prisoners to the chief priest?"
(22) Yet Saul grew more and more powerful and baffled the Jews living in Damascus by proving that Jesus is the Christ.
In Acts 22 Paul recounts his conversion. You can read that for yourself.
Read Acts 15 to learn about circumcision after the church was established. You are trying to turn Christians into Jews by demanding they follow the Jewish law. All Paul is saying in Galatians is that you no longer have to cleanse yourself with the Jewish rituals, because Jesus paid the price for our sins.
The bottom line is that those who accept Jesus Christ are not trying to become Jews. They have become Christians.
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
17 May 11
Did you neglect to read Acts 9? Did you ask what must be accomplished before the law would disappear? Perhaps you should go back and read all the New Testament instead of picking and choosing. I think you'll find you've left out quite a bit.
@Latrivia (2878)
• United States
17 May 11
It's expected of those who champion the morals and principles of their religion to live those morals and principles in their own life. There are many Christian principles that could be adhered to by anyone. The judgement portion of the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew is an excellent example. Judge not lest you be judged in like. How can you remove the speck in your brother's eye when you have a beam in your own?
I have never met a Christian who lives a christian life as described by Jesus in the Bible. I hear they exist, but they truly are a minority. The meek among the lions of the Christian religion. More often than not a Christian you meet will be flawed but that won't stop many them from thinking ill of you for your own perceived flaws.
People say Christian should live a Christian life because there are too many Christians who use their religion as an excuse to judge others, yet they are almost always the same people who have skeletons in their own closet. In other words, hypocrisy abounds among many Christians, and it's annoying to be lectured on your own flaws by a flawed hypocrite. You can't expect others to live up to your standards when not even you can do it.
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
17 May 11
I'm not going to judge the Christians you've mentioned. I don't know them nor you to say who is right and who is wrong. My discussion wasn't suppose to be about hypocrisy but about valuing a certain perceived behavior. If the non believer thinks the standards of Christianity are of value, should he also be living those standards? I'm not sure how much the non believer knows about Christianity to call Christians hypocrites. I do know there are occasions when a non Christian will accuse a Christian of not being very Christian because he hasn't done what the non Christian believes to be Christian. Is it based on what is Christian or what is perceived to be Christian?
@Latrivia (2878)
• United States
17 May 11
Good question. Is it Christian to turn the other cheek, to love your neighbor as you love yourself, and to love the sinner and hate the sin? Those were lessons I learned from over a decade of my religious upbringing. I turned away from said upbringing when I found out that the lessons I learned in Sunday school were not lessons adhered to by many in the church, or many who claimed to follow the same religion as my family. It led to a dislike of religion that took me years to come to terms with.
That is what people are talking about when they say Christians should act more Christian. To say you are Christian yet react with vitriol at the very idea of someone believing or behaving differently than you is not a terribly Christian trait.
Christan behavior is very difficult behavior to achieve. It's a docile and forgiving behavior that is almost against our nature, which is why it can seem so ideal. If one is going to claim to be an adherent to Christian teachings, it only makes sense that they make a modest attempt to actually adhere to them, yes? In the same way that you can't claim to be open-minded if you're against anything different than what you're used to, you can't claim to be Christian if you shamelessly go about with a hateful, vengeful, oppressive, and judgmental nature. Well, you can claim it, but there's a difference between being a Christian and being Christian.
@Adoniah (7513)
• United States
17 May 11
I would say that a non christian would want a christian to follow their beliefs because they would not want they to lose the belief system that they grew up with. No one wants to see someone loose their "roots". This is true even if the non believer was also once a christian themselves. No good person wishes to see another suffer or struggle with their faith or conscience. As far as it being a higher standard of life, well I cannot really agree with that. I know many non christians that lead much more moral lives than christians that I know.
I am referring to what effects a persons psyche and inner well being more than their morals etc. Christians have proven that they have as many faults and sins as anyone else.
There are many paths to the Lord. Christianity is only one way.
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
19 May 11
Actually, I wasn't talking about paths to the Lord. I'm talking about a standard of living. Should a non believer, if he puts value on Christian standards, also live by those values?
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
21 May 11
Maybe not the rules, if it isn't your religion; but if you think the day to day behavior is worthwhile, perhaps you should. It sounds like a confession of being right and fair with God, man, and beast.
@TheMetallion (1834)
• United States
19 May 11
This is the Negative Confession to Ma'at: http://www.philae.nu/akhet/Confession.html
I believe you would put value on these standards. Does that mean you should live by the rules of ancient Egyptian polytheistic worship?
@ra1787 (501)
• Italy
15 May 11
I pretty much agree with the person that stated that it is about people hating hypocrites.
Everybody agrees that a person who states certain beliefs should act according to them.
It is not a matter of higher standard or whatever else it is just a matter of being consistent. A christian should act like a christian, a buddhist like a buddhist and a muslim like a muslim. If they don't do so we might consider them hipocrites and that is usually not a good thing.
@ra1787 (501)
• Italy
15 May 11
of course i don't care if people act not accordingly to their religion as long as they recongnize that they have their personal interpretations of such religion.
What i can't really stand are people who criticize other people beliefs and then don't act according to theirs.
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
15 May 11
"Everybody agrees that a person who states certain beliefs should act according to them." What about the person who values certain beliefs? Should that person life the life he values?
@BalthasarTheRat (656)
• United States
14 May 11
Andy's answer above explains it well. The only thing I would add is there are many types of non-Christians. It often happens that someone will value the message of Christ without the religious trappings of Him as a Savior.
Certainly a non-Christian who makes such a statement must be loyal to their own religion otherwise they become the hypocrite, which it seems is what your question was trying to imply about all non-Christians.
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
15 May 11
So Balthasar, if the non believer finds value in Christianity, shouldn't he be living that kind of life? I'm not talking about the religious aspect of it, just daily life.
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
15 May 11
Actually that makes no sense. The message of Christ was in fact that he was Savior. I said over and over and over again, that he is the messiah, and if you wanted to gain forgiveness for sin, your only hope, only chance of being saved, was through himself.
I always find it odd that anyone can "value the message" but reject "Christ". Christ (which means Messiah or Redeemer), *IS* the message. "Christ" was the message of Christ.
@Chiang_Mai_boy (3882)
• Thailand
15 May 11
I am not entirely clear on what a Christian Life is and how it differs from some other lifestyle. That being said I do think that if you are going to talk the talk you do need to walk the walk.
I do not think tha a Christian Life isets any higher standard than a Hindu Life, a Muslim Life, A Buddhist Life or any other life that adheres to any other religious or social standards.
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
16 May 11
Being a Christian is following the teachings of Jesus Christ and accepting Him as your LORD and Savior. We have bumper stickers here in the USA that say, "What would Jesus do?" A problem though, is that many of those who want to tell Christians how they should live, don't know what Jesus would do. They only go by what they believe to be right, and that's usually political correctness. I believe, before a non believer can tell a believer in Christ how he should live, the non believer (even if he doesn't choose to believe) should know exactly what Jesus would do. I can't speak about other religions. I don't know anything about them. Do non believers of these other religions hold them to a higher standard, a standard the non believers have created themselves and not necessarily what is really a part of these religions?
1 person likes this
@Pose123 (21635)
• Canada
23 May 11
Hi bestboy, I guess it depends on what you mean by a Christian life. Christianity does not have a monopoly on good morals, in fact sometimes its quite the opposite. Christ's teachings in the sermon on the mount are among the best that the world has ever seen and it would be a wonderful world if everyone followed these teachings. Much of it can also be found in other writing and is perhaps followed by more non-Christians than Christians. I know many who call themselves Christians and attend church on a regular basis but I don't see them living what Christ taught. Most say that they are saved and read the Bible every day, yet Christ said "by their fruits you shall know them". Blessings.
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
2 Jun 12
It is also superior because we know our eternity is with Christ.
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
14 May 11
What authority does the non believer have to tell a Christian a hypocrite?
@ra1787 (501)
• Italy
15 May 11
it is not a matter of authority it is merely the dictionary defintion of hypocrite.
- a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious, beliefs, principles, etc. , that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
If a person calls itself christian and then acts in a way that contradicts christian beliefs that person is a hypocrite.