I think therefore I am

Tweet

You may have seen the movie 'The Matrix'. The movie really makes you think. Like what do we really know and how do we know what we know is real. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEr8hnvzeHU What is real? How do you define real? Is it only what your senses reveal to you? Is real only what we can perceive with our senses? What about those with brain disorders who see sound and hear color? Is the world 'really' the way they see it, or the way most others see it? Maybe you are now just dreaming and you'll wake up into what is 'real'? It is fascinating and a bit disconserting to contemplate such things. How do we ascertain truth or 'real'? Rational thought? Reason? How do we know our 'reason' and rationality are not controled by something over and above us? As portrayed in the movie The Matrix. Or how do we know our senses are telling us ALL that is there, after all, insects see the world entirely different than we do. So, I have come to see that there are 'layers' to reality. I see one, the bugs see another. And we both feel that that is all there is to what is 'real'. Descartes said we have to begin with doubt to find the truth. Descartes famous quote: Cogito ergo sum, I think, therefore I am. What are the foundations of knowledge? Reason, logic, rational thought are all part of how we know what we know. What about our concept of 'perfect'? Where does this concept come from? What if it comes from a 'higher' reality? The human mind is wired for abstract thought. To ask 'what if' & to contemplate other realities. Think about the word 'metaphysical'. META (def) prefix appearing in loanwords from Greek, with the meanings “after,” “along with,” “beyond,” “among,” “behind,” Physical (def) 1. of or pertaining to the body: physical exercise. 2. of or pertaining to that which is material: the physical universe; the physical sciences. 3. noting or pertaining to the properties of matter and energy other than those peculiar to living matter. (and I've tried to show that the Physical world can even be perceived differently according to the eyes and brains perceiving it) So, metaphysical can be taken to mean; after the physcial, along with the physical, beyond the physical, among the physical, behind the physical. And if we only accept that which our senses can experience (empirical evidence) then we are saying that we should not doubt what our senses tell us and we should not accept the meta-physical as being possible. Descartes says our ability to doubt was the beginning of finding the truth. As we know, things are not always as they seem. I am saddened by those who insist that faith or belief in God is not logical or rational. They contend that since their eyes cannot see, their ears cannot hear, their tongues cannot taste nor the skin feel GOD, He does not exist. They are closed minded to 'other realities' and the idea of layers of reality. And in studying the philosophy of men like Descartes I am also learing how illogical it is to accept ONLY what your senses tell you. The human mind is capable of abstract thought, appreciation of abstract principles and of developing PHILOSOPHY in the first, it was meant for so much more than JUST what the senses reaveal to it. So what do you 'think'