is resignation the best way to solve the problem?
By murkie
@murkie (1103)
Philippines
May 31, 2011 7:58am CST
oftentimes, we see that when a huge mistake while in office was done, the person at fault resigns from his/her post. but then, the management is all too happy with that decision. why? to save the company from further disgrace? i don't think so.
if the person at fault resigns, s/he would have left the problem for someone else to solve. where is the "accountability" for that?
if the person at fault resigns, s/he wouldn't be liable for administrative cases. criminal and civil, maybe. but company policy wouldn't be able to "touch" him/her since s/he would no longer be an employee to that company.
take, for example, imf's strauss-kahn. or diokno in ph bureau of corrections.
so if i lose my company large money, i would just resign and that's it?
5 responses
@penrockerchic (1903)
• Philippines
31 May 11
I got puzzled with the topic as well. It actually made me think twice how accountability works. It should work both ways. As for some people who might have committed something wrong that disgraced the company, they often think of the current situation they might be in and that includes the reactions of other co-workers and constituents, living and embarrassing situation almost every day and not being happy with the environment they're working in. As for the company, they usually allow such people to resign or even give them the option to resign for the simple reason of having to face the same disgrace or to face further damage. Like any other person, the first thing that usually comes to mind when solving problems is by eliminating the source of the problem and finding other means to solve them even if it means passing the responsibility and accountability to others.
@penrockerchic (1903)
• Philippines
3 Jun 11
Usually, the company opts to have their honor and integrity intact as it's usually what's important especially when in comes to businesses. Other enterprises and organizations tend to cut any connections to companies with a pretty bad impression or reputation. People and other constituents would start losing trust to the company and keeping that integrity intact is what's more important. Also, if the company believes that an employee was found to be guilty in their own premises without doing anything about it, it attracts further damage. If an employee is no longer tied with the company, then they can easily make a case against the person a lot easier, avoiding conflicts of interest.
1 person likes this
@magnafrost (62)
• India
31 May 11
as far as i know , the accountability of employees for the company ends at their job. the company can make it extremely hard for the employee to get jobs after that buts thats about it. for isntance, if i messed up somethign and cost my company a few thousand dollars (not ill-will, either incapacity or carelessness) i doubt they can sue me. so better get the fellow out than otherwise.
1 person likes this
@murkie (1103)
• Philippines
31 May 11
yes, the person may be sued with criminal or a civil case. but wouldn't it be more proper if s/he will be punished by the "company law", ifever there was one?
but anyway, shouldn't s/he be obliged to fix the problem first before leaving? well, maybe not. s/he probably might cause further damage.
@chiyosan (30184)
• Philippines
31 May 11
i don't think it is the same for private corporations.. but i'd say in public offices, when something like this happens, they are charged, investigated and they will definitely have to pay for their wrong doings. i think they should indeed resign to not further cause more shame in the government because after all, they are there as they are elected by people, or chosen by the President. so the confidence and the trust is lost.. what is the point of them still being in the office if they will no longer perform well (bothered by the current issue/etc.)9
1 person likes this
@murkie (1103)
• Philippines
31 May 11
they wouldn't necessarily be active in office when they are charged. they can be suspended for the duration. at least they would still be an employee, so they are still liable for administrative charges.
resignation for further shame is a good excuse, though. it's as if the company is disowning the employee when s/he commits a scandal.
@nahsellout (1)
• Antigua And Barbuda
1 Jun 11
In my many years of living on this earth i have seen a lot of mishaps in my workplace and also my acquaintances' workplace. As a unique individual you will always be noticed because of the good you do or the potential that people see in you.
Honestly in many cases you may resign just to get way from the heat and pressure that the bias coworkers occasionally put on you but i think of that method of dealing with that situation is overused. When we were children we were told to always find our fears and fight then in order to overcome the fear. I think that you should apply this principle to the workplace, you find the offender and confront them and show them that you are not afraid to defend yourself! This will show them that you are not easily mis-leaded and that they cannot get away with doing bad to you. this is gauranteed to work instead of quitting your job and lose the pentionalability in your retirement years.
@murkie (1103)
• Philippines
1 Jun 11
even to the point that everybody, including your boss, gives you the silent treatment? or your boss no longer hands you your duties? or even when your coworkers refuse just talking to you?
but anyway, it's a nice philosophy, since you should be running your life and not let anybody else do it for you.