India and UDRS
By balu_maris
@balu_maris (240)
India
June 24, 2011 12:31am CST
Dear All,
The BCCI is still against the use of the UDRS. I think it is only India who is going to lose out without the UDRS. If you take a look at the previous test match itself, in the second innings, there were a few dismissals which, were controversial. Suresh Raina was given out caught at leg slip. But there was no evidence of an edge. Harbhajan was given out LBW, but replays showed that the ball was missing the stumps. And when Dhoni was out caught at point of Bishoo, it was actually a no ball. But then the Indians cannot complain, because they have opted out of UDRS. The excuse they say is that, the system is flawed.
I believe that the UDRS only improves the decision making in cricket. Of course, it is not perfect. But then, the Umpires too are human. And the Umpires are under so much of pressure, they invariable end up making a few mistakes here and there. The UDRS reudeces this. The ICC should use anything that will reduce mistakes, and UDRS has always reduced mistakes. The BCCI has too much power and money, It is unfair that the BCCI controls decisions like this and not the ICC. I believe that ICC should make UDRS compulsory in all the matches with the Snickometer. I hope that they take this decision sooner than ,later.
The UDRS is not flawless and it is okay like that. It will always keep the human element in the game. But it will certainly reduce errors in the game. And that is what the ICC should look for.
Share your views...
Balu
2 people like this
4 responses
@keenan_savio (416)
• India
24 Jun 11
Well said Balu_maris, the Indians cannoto complain as they themselves have opted out of the UDRS. Daryl Harper made some shocking decisions in the second innings and too bad India were at the receiving end. Not just the decision about Raina but also Harbhajan, Dhoni. No doubt there is a lot of pressure on the umpires out there buit when you look at someone of Harpers caliber you are left speachless.
I hope India give it a serious thought and take the UDRS into play as soon as possible as it could have benefited India in so many decisions in the last game. Also as you mentioned balu_maris the BCCI is the richest board in the world and at the moment it is dictating terms and the ICC will have to do something very quickly do have the UDRS implemented. It will definately improve decision making in the game and also reduce the pressure on the onfield umpires.
@balu_maris (240)
• India
24 Jun 11
Thank you Keenan,
It is a pity that India do not want to take the UDRS. They fail to see that the spinners will benefit more with the UDRS. And India's strength has always been spin bowling. India has said no to UDRS because they had a bad experience when they had used it the first time in the India series in Srilanka. India was on the receiving end because they did not use the opportunities wisely. I mean if you have edged one and you know it, accept it. Do not waste a referral.
What I am trying to say is, if a team uses the UDRS wisely, it will only reduce the errors on the cricket field. It will be better for the future of cricket....
Share your views...
Balu
1 person likes this
@ram_cv (16513)
• India
27 Jun 11
ICC has just come up with a new set of guidelines for UDRS to satisfy the demands of BCCI. These include inclusion of Hot Spot into the UDRS as requested by Sachin. Also, the Hawk Eye technology has been removed from the UDRS as this was not exact science as of now. So I think now India should go on and take up the UDRS option.
Cheers!
Ram
@balu_maris (240)
• India
28 Jun 11
Dear Ram,
Well, I heard of the new decision taken by the ICC. I think it is great for Cricket. Any technology implemented will only reduce the errors. But I still believe that Hawk Eye should be used along with the Hot Spot and the Snickometer. But I will accept something rather than nothing in this scenario.
Share your views...
Balu
@ptrikha_2 (46968)
• India
24 Jun 11
Indian cricket board has raised certain objections to HawkEye technology, saying that it is not fool proof. They have, however, supported snickometer and hotspot. This is justifiable since HawkEye does has some limitations as of now.
However, considering that some of the crucial decisions have gone against India in the test match versus West Indies, Indian cricket baord should have a fresh look. May be Indian team can agree to using UDRS, but take a look at it if some more things still go wrong.
1 person likes this
@balu_maris (240)
• India
27 Jun 11
Dear Prithika,
Hawk eye is flawed. But what Hawk eye does is reduces errors...!!! When an umpire makes a wrong decision, which might end up changing the complexion of the match unnecessarily, the UDRS, will definitely avoid such cases...!!! All the players have to do is use the referrals wisely...!!!! Just because the decision was against a top batsman, he just does not have to use it...!!!
If the batsman know that it is out, then he should walk, instead of wasting a referral.Hot spot and the Snickometer will only improve the technology. But mean while the BCCI can definitely agree to use what is at disposal...!!!
Share your views...
Balu.
@venkit (2955)
• India
25 Jun 11
ya BCCI is always making UDRS to stand away.
surely UDRS should be implemented with all technical supports like snickometer, Hot spot and hawk eye.
but the current UDRS everywhere dont use all these 3 things.
if it happens to use all these three and then predict the result then it would be very helpful for cricket.
1 person likes this