Would you work for $2000 per month if family trust gives you $7000 a month?
By scheng1
@scheng1 (24649)
Singapore
August 9, 2011 12:41am CST
A friend takes up a job as a laborer and commands $2,000 per month with overtime.
His job is a blue collar job, and he needs to work overtime, and shift.
However, he receives $7,000 per month from his family trust fund.
He does not need to work so hard since he has such a stable income from the family trust fund.
Would you work for $2,000 per month if you have income of $7,000 per month?
What would you do if you are in his shoes?
5 people like this
26 responses
@1hopefulman (45120)
• Canada
9 Aug 11
Maybe he has come to appreciate that working and earning his livelihood does much for his self-esteem and self-worth. Just getting money without doing anything in return is not satisfying. The balance is missing. He is getting but not giving.
Have you ever asked him why he works when he doesn't have to?
1 person likes this
@1hopefulman (45120)
• Canada
11 Aug 11
Then if he is happy, that's fine. I have discovered that even if I had lots of money I would do some work for the challenge and for the change. Although it would be a minimal part of my life as I have many things that I enjoy doing that bring little or no money return and that is also fine.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
11 Aug 11
Hi 1hopefulman, I think we just have to find something to do to create meaning in life.
Some people can spend all their time doing religious activities, but most of us cannot.
Some people have the desire to travel the whole world but most of us find that two weeks to a month is enough vacation time.
Some people, such as my friend, belong to those that do not even like to step out into the world.
They have no desire to do something different from their daily routine.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
9 Aug 11
Hi 1hopefulman, the culture of hard work runs in his family.
They do not have high education, and they rely on their hard work and willingness to get their hands dirty to get rich.
They do not speculate in anything either.
They have lands, and they have a cash generating family business.
This person actually comes from neighboring country.
He used to be a jungle guide when he was at his homeland.
I think he comes here for the sake of his children.
The educational system here is better than his country, and he wants his children to be better educated than him.
If he does not work, I doubt he can survive long.
Some people just have a very simple life as in eat, sleep, work and they do not want to sit around and relax.
1 person likes this
@millertime (1394)
• United States
9 Aug 11
I might keep working if I really enjoyed my work but it sounds like your friend has to work hard and long hours on his job. I don't think I would do that. I would probably take the $7000 per month and then look for something to work at for fun, probably part time. I sure wouldn't be working a job where I had to work overtime. I enjoy my time off too much for that.
1 person likes this
@SomeCowgirl (32191)
• United States
9 Aug 11
I would work because while the luxury of having the $7000 seems great, what happens if it was to suddenly freeze? I'd save the $2000 I got from working into a savings account and about $3000 of the $7000 into that same savings account. I wouldn't touch it. It'd be a nice little retirement. I'd live off the other $4000 per month and since I don't see myself needing but say $2000 or $2500 of it I'd save the rest in a different savings account for small trips.
@SomeCowgirl (32191)
• United States
9 Aug 11
Yes of course, saving is key and setting examples is definitely key. We don't want to spoil our children with thinking they can have everything. THough I've seen that today, it's scary really and sad. Children should be taught the value of money.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
9 Aug 11
Hi Somecowgirl, I think that is a very good idea, especially if you still have a family to support.
I think many parents will set a good example by continuing to work even if they do not need the money now.
At least they can teach their children that money does not fall from sky, and that they have to rely on their own working ability to support themselves.
I think the only time when you can consider retirement is after the children have graduated from college, and have good jobs.
By then, your investment will help to support you.
Even if you do not have the trust fund, you can still use the same method to build up a retirement nest.
It just takes a bit longer.
1 person likes this
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
9 Aug 11
Hi Somecowgirl, I think those who come from a background of hard work and poverty will teach their children very well.
At least they have their good examples to impart values to the children.
Sometimes, those honest and hardworking parents are better in managing their money.
They do not have much bad habits, and they always save money, pay up their house, and buy land.
When their land appreciates in value, their children and grandchildren benefit.
@minx267 (15527)
• Hartford, Connecticut
9 Aug 11
I say, why not? If you are perfectly capable of working the job. Why not?
what else is he going to do all day.. spend all of that $7000 a month? Much better to Earn more and put it away and save for a day he is not physically able to work or when he finally decides he wants to slow down.. he will have that much more money.
I don't think I would quit my job if I came into money.. everybody needs a purpose.. We can't just sit around our house and get fat from laziness. We need to have some contact with the world. A job is the best way to do that.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
9 Aug 11
Hi Minx267, I think he continues working so that he can avoid facing his mother in law the whole day.
He is staying with his wife, children and mother in law.
His mother in law actually does not live in this country, but she likes the weather here.
His father in law just passed away, and so he let his mother in law continued staying with him.
I think if I were him, I would work very long hours in the factory too.
Who likes to face mother in law every day?
1 person likes this
@GardenGerty (160624)
• United States
10 Aug 11
I think minx is right, we all need something purposeful to do . Besides avoiding the mother in law.
@minx267 (15527)
• Hartford, Connecticut
10 Aug 11
LOL. while that is a good reason.. I bet feeding a family can get expensive. and schooling.. it is best to save up your money while you can. Thanks @GardenGerty - I have heard there are many stories of people who retire only to pass away shortly after.. as if without something to do.. there was no reason to keep getting up in the morning... :(
@adhyz82 (36249)
• Indonesia
12 Aug 11
I think I will still work for $ 2000 per month.
Working is not only getting salary, but also looking for the bustle and a career ..
Working will also make us more productive and appreciate how expensive the money so that we will be more careful in spending money
Thanks also to my family who have given me as much money as $ 7,000 per month and I will use in the right place for that money
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
12 Aug 11
Hi Adhyz, I think my friend does not know what is career!
I doubt anyone can call a laborer as embarking on a career.
After all, carrying heavy things is not really a step to anywhere.
With his family wealth, he could have started a business or something better, but he is not the kind of persons who like to worry about financial matter or use his brains.
That is why he chooses to sweat out as a laborer.
I think you have the right idea about keeping guard on family wealth.
$7000 a month is a lot of money.
We cannot assume that we can use up all the money that ancestors leave behind.
1 person likes this
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
13 Aug 11
Hi Adhyz, I still write a few articles now and then.
Most of the times I spend here, Webanswers, my blog, and playing Dungeons and Treasures for cash.
I still spend time rating articles in Helium in order to cash out my passive income, and I still post a few new articles in Triond.
Sometimes, I repost the content from Triond to Redgage.
@huilichan8 (1378)
• Singapore
10 Aug 11
I suppose it depends on various factors. For me, I would do the same because there are a lot of things that I want to do in life and money is the answer.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
10 Aug 11
Hi Huilichan, I think if we have kids, we would have saved the money for the kids too.
I think it is natural that parents want to provide for the children, so that they do not start working life paying debts for many years.
It is a pity that many children take on educational loan, and have to work for many years to pay it off.
Even before they finish paying the loan, they might have other loans, such as mortgage for the house.
I think that is the reason many parents try to save as much as possible, so that their children do not get into so much debt.
@huilichan8 (1378)
• Singapore
10 Aug 11
If you are married and have kids, your kids must be very fortunate.:)
@GardenGerty (160624)
• United States
10 Aug 11
I would probably continue to work, if I liked my job. I think we need to have meaningful things to do, of course volunteering would be meaningful as well. Someone else said that they would continue to save, because money does not last forever, and that is a good reason as well.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
10 Aug 11
Hi GardenGerty, I think it all depends on our family circumstance.
if we have children, we might want to continue working as long as we can, partly to serve as a model for children, and partly to save the money for their college education.
If we are single, and do not plan on a family, maybe volunteering is a better choice.
At least we are finding a bigger family to bring happiness to them.
@sacmom (14192)
• United States
9 Sep 11
I don't think I would. Not that I'm lazy (I work hard at my job). There are so many people out there that need jobs. The last thing I'd want to do is to take away their opportunity to be able to earn a living...especially if I don't have to. Not only that, but I'd much rather spend my time with my family anyway...even if they do drive me up the wall sometimes! LOL
With that said, if I really had an urge to work, I think I'd volunteer my time instead.
Happy mylotting!
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
10 Sep 11
Hi Sacmom, yes, that is a good idea.
It is good when we can decide to work for satisfaction rather than work for money.
I think my friend is really fortunate to have a steady income from his family trust. But he belongs to the kind of persons who cannot stay idle.
Volunteering is not his cup of tea too.
Besides, he does not have much hobby, except to enter casino to try his luck every now and then.
I think if he stops working, he would gamble away all his money.
@tinkerick (1257)
• United States
10 Aug 11
Depends on the job. With his job, no I wouldn't stay working. My type of job however, I might simply because I do enjoy what I do and it makes for a good example to my kids that people work for a living.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
11 Aug 11
Hi Tinkerick, I think my friend rather enjoys his work.
He is not that smart, and does not enjoy thinking.
He just likes to do simple jobs that do not need him to think.
After all, just carry heavy loads do not need high intelligence.
He can idle around when there is no work to be done.
I think he also likes to mingle with people in the same level as him, talking about family, money and other things.
@Hatley (163776)
• Garden Grove, California
10 Aug 11
schengq I would work but not as blue collar but as a nurse and save the 7000 and put it into the bank so when I was his retirement age I would retire with lots of money to use in my old age. but I am not him and not having anyde. I would not really know what it would be like to have a family trust fund wow.
@Hatley (163776)
• Garden Grove, California
10 Aug 11
typo words missing" I am not him and am not having any idea of what i would do." sorry
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
10 Aug 11
Hi Hatley, I understand what you mean.
I think even if you have the money from the family trust fund, you might want to work and spend only the money you have earned.
Some people have no problem with spending the money of their hardworking ancestors.
However, most people are not like that.
They know that they have to treasure their inheritance, since their ancestors work so hard for it.
I think we all have a kind of independence that we valued, especially financial independence.
@soapies1973 (931)
• United States
13 Aug 11
I would definitely not be working so much if I had a trust like that coming in really. That is so very lucky when so many are struggling. I am sure that they could find something to do and not work so much or even part time.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
14 Aug 11
Hi Soapies, yes, my friend is indeed very lucky to have ancestors like that.
I think his ancestors were all very hardworking and thrifty.
Looking at the way my friend works, I think he still carries the good genes of his ancestors.
Just too bad he is not good at using his brains.
He could have invested his money wisely, so that the dividend will exceed even his trust fund.
@redvakaurvaki (4216)
• Indonesia
10 Aug 11
hi, scheeng1, nice topic actually!
having own income from our job is really a proudness, but I can't deny that I'd rather rest for $7000 a month from my family.I think I will choose to make some investement, start to own business and having fun with that $7000
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
10 Aug 11
Hi Redvakaurvaki, if you have young children, you would not think about spending the $7000 on luxury.
You would think about the children, and how much they need for college education, as well as their marriage and housing problem.
All these expenses are still in the future.
I think starting a business is good.
Even wise investment is a better choice than spending on luxuries.
I think my friend just does not know how to enjoy life.
He does not see the need to travel the world, or buy luxuries or spend on restaurant food.
He belongs to the class of simple people who work hard, save hard, and get rich.
@BannedHelsing (693)
• Philippines
10 Aug 11
I will still work or erect my own business but I won't be sitting around all day. Even $7000 is already a lot of money, I still like to spend the money I earned with my blood and sweat.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
10 Aug 11
Hi BannedHelsing, if we just have the money and nothing else to do, I think we will die of boredom soon.
Starting a business is a good idea, since we have another source of income, we would not worry too much about capital funding problem.
I agree that $7000 is a lot of money.
Most of us are happy with even half of that as our take home salary.
@AgentGulaman (3546)
• Philippines
10 Aug 11
Well, if I love the work that I am doing then I will still work. Money is not everything, and working does not give you only money. It can give you experiences, friends and some other good and bad things in living. That's what makes it interesting aside form the money. If I don't want the work that I am doing, I wouldn't bother to still work then and look for other things to do. Also, if I am aiming on a goal financially, then I will still work because it can add up to reach my finacial goals. I still believe that spending your hard earned money is far more rewarding than spending something that was easily gotten.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
10 Aug 11
Hi AgentGulaman, yes, spending our own money is definitely better and sweeter than spending money that we do not earned.
It is worse to spend our ancestors' money, knowing that they had to work very hard in order to provide for their children, grandchildren and so on.
At least if we win lottery, we do not feel as if we are making use of somebody.
I think even if we like working, we might stop working for money once we have enough. We can start to work voluntarily so that we find more happiness.
@jsae29 (1120)
• Philippines
10 Aug 11
Of course, I would still work. For me, it's not all about money. People work so that they'll have a sense of achievement and importance. When you work also you get to experience a lot of things that you cannot get just by spending your money.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
10 Aug 11
Hi Jsae, if you have stable income from family trust fund, I think you can even start a business and work for yourself.
If you have a good business, you can even teach your children to manage the business, so that they do not have to work for other people.
It is true that work provides achievement.
But then the better way is to invest the money, and then use the money to help other people.
I think many rich people find it happier to use their wealth to help people, instead of always working for money.
@dragon54u (31634)
• United States
9 Aug 11
I might admire that man. Everyone needs a purpose in life and perhaps for him, that means a job to attend every day. He can do a lot of things with the money--save it for his retirement or give it to charities. I think this is a man who needs to stay busy and have a goal in life.
I have enough income to take care of my living expenses if I'm frugal. However, I don't have a job and am not likely to have one seeing as our economy is in the dumps. Everyone needs something to look forward to--every day is the same for me, writing on the internet. I would love to have a job, paying or not. Maybe this is how this man feels.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
9 Aug 11
Hi Dragon54u, yes, you are right in reading his character.
He is a very simple man in a sense.
He needs to work and sweat in order to live.
Some people just cannot relax or spend whole day reading or surfing internet.
He is one of those people who do not have high education, and prefer to work at job that does not require thinking.
Even though his family is rich, he still wants to have something to do.
Back in his home town, which is a small place in the middle of nowhere, he worked as a jungle guide.
This is the kind of job that suits him.
He moves over here, with his family. His children can get better education in my country.
But he never changes much, except to spend time in casino when he is not working for the weekend.
I think he much prefer to work than to stay home.
@dodo19 (47317)
• Beaconsfield, Quebec
9 Aug 11
I would probably still work, even if I had so much a month from family funds. It would give me something to do, and it would give me extra money to put into savings or to put onto something else, whether it be a bill, or something. I think that it would be worth while. I would have no problems with working, even though I would be getting so much.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
10 Aug 11
Hi dodo, I would like to have something to do every day too.
When money is not a problem, then I can find something fulfilling to do.
I think the best is to serve as volunteer in some organizations, so that we can take off as and when we want, and still find satisfaction in helping others.
i think I would learn more about investment, so that the money can grow, and I have more to help others.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
10 Aug 11
Hi Maezee, actually it is not US$2,000, it is S$2,000.
There is not much difference now, since the Singapore dollar is very strong, and US dollar is getting very weak.
I think if you have a monthly income of $7,000 from your family trust, and you still earn $2,000, you would have the ability to buy big house and large tract of land in your country.
@acrossnation (773)
• Malaysia
9 Aug 11
Thats easy, i would still work so my money will grow. When i know that ive already 7k a month my working job will be easier less tension and my outlook of the shift and overtime will be as a bonus. Is money ever enough as our needs is different from others.
@scheng1 (24649)
• Singapore
10 Aug 11
Hi Acrossnation, that is good to hear.
It shows that you are very hardworking and have a good attitude towards money.
Most people do not think so far ahead, they just think about spending money.
I think most of us still prefer to earn our own money, so that we can spend without feeling guilty.
After all, family trust fund is the result of the hard work of the ancestors.
It is not good to think about spending, and forget that ancestors work very hard.
I think the hardworking gene runs in my friend's family.
He does not have high education, yet he does not mind doing overtime and carry heavy loads.
@Mayuko (1268)
• United States
9 Aug 11
I think I wouldn't work if I was receiving that amount of money.
At the same time, if I had a job I truly enjoyed, then I would likely still work. Maybe your friend likes his job. Or he feels that it would seem lazy of him to not work and only live off the trust fund.