Where is the Rational Party?

Tweet

We have a two party system in America with small wanna-be parties hovering around like gnats, trying to influence the bigger picture. Among these, most are extremist. The Communists are still lurking somewhere. The Libertarians are almost their polar opposite and are growing in popularity. The Green Party, relatively powerful in Europe, doesn't make much of a dent here. In other shadows we would find a quiet, but powerful, Fascist/"Skin-head" movement bolstered by the fear of our "foreign, pretender" President. Among these, there has suddenly emerged a new voice: the Tea Party. In the simplest terms this party is about change. They are spawned by dissatisfaction with all the politicians in Washington and the powerful special interest groups that they feel pull Congress from the will of the people. On the surface they seem dedicated to the simple act of opposing the status quo. But what do they really desire as an end game? This question is as complicated as American politics in general. In interviews at Tea Party events, even within the same event, several different ideals are represented. The most common, aside from the idea of reform in Washington, are the need for smaller Federal government, the fear of social programs at any level, and rampant Nationalism (close the borders, stay at home military and English as official national language, for instance). These concepts make the Tea Party increasingly popular because there are so many ways to fit in. The side effect is a dilution of direction and inclusion of radical elements from the fringe parties trying to increase their own agendas. Certainly the Libertarians and Fascists are bolstered by Tea Party ideas. My question finally comes in here: Where is a party for the Realist, the Rationalist, who sees where we are and has a slight goal in mind: something as simple as minor reforms to ensure public involvement and political accountability but no desire to direct policy in the long run? Where does a person fit who only wants this country to remain strong, but also involved and a great big brother to developing countries and friendly cousin to the rest? Where go the ones who see a Big Government as a necessary balance to Big Business in the way that the three branches of government are meant to balance one another? To all the extremists, such a person would appear as the opposite extreme: "you're either with 'em or agin' 'em". To the Libertarians they are Socialists and to those Socialists they are Tea Partiers, while the Fascists see World Government Conspiracists. Why has America become so polarized? Where is there a middle ground and why is noone standing in it? Why has compromise become a bad word?