Is cruelty to animals, if you are fishing and fish that died were not eaten?

FAKE! He also hunts deer and determine if he has one shot he's in the forest can be sure. but if it should be no fake: hey people, how much intelligence you expect from a man of "I throw their bodies into the water" or "fish tastes nice" instead of "not" write ..? So please. such a person need not be determined with morals and ethics come ..

If you have a fun fishing for so, then you get this fishing game but it is nevertheless of: Ravensburger, MB. . etc. Then you can catch fish without killing you;. Is it better;) And you can also make home and must not always go to the lake / run. . I hope I could help.

If you think need to go fishing already, then just ask but even before, if you decline someone's fish. But with your attitude is probably difficult. Ever heard that you can expose fish again ??????? What are you doing for you?? To order the fish or so to kill the fish?? But since your friend is speaking here of cruelty to animals, killing the fish you seem not to make too neat. Bungler! What you do is just crap. Today, there are fish - small animals tomorrow - and tomorrow.

what should make it fun? butt for hours at the lake sit and wait until a bite? and then not even eat. yes it is cruelty, the fish it can be true regardless of whether they are eaten or thrown away, but if you've been fun to kill fish, then eat it at least. there are so many people are starving and you throw your food away??

if they're alive and you throw it back to the ocean water wouldn't be a cruelty but if you have it killed or semi-alive and then you just throw it to the trash then definitely it'd be an animal cruelty.