Print and broadcast media as far as pronounced that it would harm others
By gengeni
@gengeni (3308)
Indonesia
August 27, 2011 11:31am CST
If the lust of money .- Print and broadcast media as far as pronounced that it would harm others.
Be .- Print and radio stations have always dubious, or she finally rediscovered their ancient roots? This question I have read in a local forum and the forum community has come to the incurious, that the print has contributed .- and broadcasters with their years of lunchtime shows and with the violence glorifying films to a mass stupidity and increased violence of men. Even the cultural demand of the population is said to have drastically suffered greatly from the many TV offers. In addition, many users blame the media, that freak out as many students. According to some doctors, students should build their rage on television even further because they have no way to reduce anger-quite the contrary, they would accept violence in various films yet! In addition, some were of the opinion that killer games do not would just be bad because they encourage team play and yes you could even reduce anger!
Others were of the opinion that it would not be anorexic to this extent, if the media had not called for a slimming illusion!
So my question: Is the money lust of the print and broadcasting companies .- so far pronounced that she would deliberately harm others, to follow only the flow of money?
2 people like this
2 responses
@najibdina29 (1309)
• Indonesia
29 Aug 11
So, now let's leave the church in the village. As someone who has himself worked for many years as a journalist, I'm not media friendly. I know the weak points and the dark corners in this business very well. But I can tell from his own knowledge that they can not weaker or darker than in other occupations.
If you do not get along with his life is, first and foremost, once your responsibility.
1 person likes this
@kendedes2011 (2712)
• Indonesia
29 Aug 11
Wanted to write something separate but you has already written everything I think and my opinion is. There are no more values , everything is drawn in the dirt, people are given the ridicule or destroyed. Why? For money!
@nakula2009 (2325)
• Indonesia
28 Aug 11
So the media influence public opinion very strongly and can be manipulated, so hopefully this is beyond question.
Unlike fascism would not have been possible ......
Current media and money are so hot that they cause harm to others to earn more money.
Because there are so many examples.
The photos had been of the wrong suspects on the front page .... Which were then attacked in public ... And even if it was the right suspect, would still violate his personal rights.
So those are the two cases of hardship ...
The so-called stars are refused the right to privacy simply. Paparazzi are in my eyes all the lowest (basest) profession in general. As I have before each loo-woman a thousand times more respect than it was a paparazzo ......
But of course people keep alive the pure pull himself all the garbage. And these are not just a few.