Part timer employees deserves benefits too

@gewcew23 (8007)
United States
September 6, 2011 5:27pm CST
About three years ago I was a full time employee. I got personal time, vacation time(one week for the first year, two for the second, three for the fifth and four for the tenth), holiday pay, and health insurance. Until three years ago I just took these benefits for granted, and then I got downsized. I found worker pretty quickly but the only difference between my past job and my current job, I am part time. I work 32 hours a week oppose to my full time counter parts who work 40 hours a week. They receive all the benefits of my previous job, where as I do not. I do the same work, the only difference is I have never had a vacation in three years, where as my counter parts actually get paid to take a week off from work. I have ask my employer to be made a full time employee multiply times, yet I get turned down every time. I am told there are no full time positions available. I so wish I could find a full time job, but I would be willing to just receive the same kind of benefits as my full time counter parts. Do part timers not deserve equal benefits, or are we to be simply worked to death and thrown into the street?
1 person likes this
6 responses
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
7 Sep 11
When a word like "deserve" comes up, it's usually more general than specific - i.e. anyone working being entitled to more than they're getting. I can't speak to your situation in particular, because I don't know about your situation in particular. But in general, I think it all depends on the company and whether or not they can afford to offer every employee the same type of package. And, of course, one sets the precedent, then it's discrimination if it's not offered to everyone. Some employers simply cannot afford to do that. And it doesn't make a lot of sense that all employers should. After all, business owners are not guaranteed anything just by running a business. The odds are actually overwhelming. Over 80% of all businesses fail. If an employer vests in the packages and loses his or her job, many still receive benefits of some sort. When the employer loses the business, no such luck. I remember watching some documentary and then coming to argue it out on myLot, about a guy bussing tables in a restaurant and wanting to go on strike because his boss was not treating him equally. He was not receiving as much money as the boss and felt that he was being treated as, well, a mere employee. Maybe I approach this from a different standpoint. I don't have any benefits. I don't receive employer-provided insurance. I'm self-employed, operate my own business, and no matter how many hours I clock or how hard I work, there is a great chance I will fail. When I hire someone to complete some work for me, I literally cannot afford to treat them as my "equal." It's my business. It's my risk. It's my initiative. I really get that some people want to be treated as more than the help. But generally speaking--again, as I don't know your particular job--employees are hired to be the help. Most businesses cannot function as businesses if they treat everyone to top-notch pay and benefits and vacation time. One thing I've always wondered about guys like that busboy, though: If he has so much energy to rally for equality in the workplace, why isn't he using that drive to start his own business? I can't call it. I just know most businesses aren't set up to be profit-shares with employees.
1 person likes this
@dragon54u (31634)
• United States
7 Sep 11
Just curious, what kind of business are you in?
• United States
11 Sep 11
I help web start-ups traffic their businesses through targeted keyword campaigns and content distribution.
• United States
7 Sep 11
That should read: "If an employEE vests in the packages and loses his or her job..."
1 person likes this
@thezone (9394)
• Ireland
6 Sep 11
That does not sound right! I don't know about your employment laws but part time staff have the same entitlements here as full timers.
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
7 Sep 11
I live in the USA where there are very few employment laws.
@thezone (9394)
• Ireland
7 Sep 11
I know the work situation is bad all over but surly there is something in place to protect part time workers and give them a voice.
@stephcjh (38473)
• United States
8 Sep 11
I think part-time employees do deserve at least half of the benefits offered to full-time employees. That at least seems a bit more fair than nothing at all.
@thezone (9394)
• Ireland
13 Sep 11
why half?
@dragon54u (31634)
• United States
7 Sep 11
One of the ways that businesses make enough money to stay in business and keep employing people is to hire part-timers. It is THEIR business and THEIR choice, just as it is your choice to work there. Unfortunately, it may be the only choice you have in this suck-y economic climate. But those are the rules and you have to play by them. To mandate that they give you benefits would probably mean that you would be let go because they could not afford it. I'm sorry you don't get benefits. I've never worked at a job with benefits and I'm 57. I've bought my own insurance, saved money to take unpaid days off (none planned!!) and managed as best I could. I think most of us live that way now and probably will in the future because our economy won't return to prosperity for decades, I think. So, sorry you don't get benefits but at least you have a job. I haven't had a job for 3 years and would trade places with you in a minute if it's something that I could do, benefits or not!
@thezone (9394)
• Ireland
13 Sep 11
wow. I am sorry that you guys are treated so badly and have no voice. The job market is bad but I would not take that kind of rubbish! I would not call what the OP is speaking of as benefits (pay, holidays and conditions are expected), their working week was cut through no fault of their own as I understand it but cut or not or part time it should make no difference
@Jeltroy (107)
• United States
7 Sep 11
There's a difference between per diem and part time employees. The reason I say that, is because maybe your employor is not familiar with the differences. Per diem are employees who work less than 30 hours a week and sometimes less than 5 days a week, and are unbenefitted. Part time employees should be able to receive some benefits, though not the same as is offered to full time employees. Check the employment laws and labor board in your State. I wouldn't want you to lose your job over this, but you should know your employee rights.
@thezone (9394)
• Ireland
13 Sep 11
What is the difference and what do you define as benefits? This is aimed at everyone in this discussion.
• United States
7 Sep 11
part time employees do deserve some beenfits too. I rememebr working at a job and the full time were treated better. I found that many of the part time employees were only motivated to stop working and constantly complaining bacause they were being treated differently.
@stephcjh (38473)
• United States
8 Sep 11
I have seen alot of that also. Part-time employees do deserve something!