Would You Pay to Keep USPS Open?

United States
September 15, 2011 1:32am CST
Recently, there have been lots of talk about increasing downsizing at US postal services (USPS). Lots of USPS employees are finding themselves without work, and some after years of services at the USPS. Some people say we have to pay more to keep the USPS open and keep its employees working. I am however of the opinion that the days of USPS are numbered, and it is only a matter of time before most of its branches close their doors. Who wants to wait days or weeks for sent mail to be received, when with the click of a mouse you can deliver your mail in seconds? Would you pay more to keep the USPS open and keep its employees working? Why?
1 person likes this
5 responses
@jazzyrae (1745)
• United States
16 Sep 11
yes i would i think we still need them today. I use them alot i completly support the ups
• United States
16 Sep 11
Though I have not used the USPS for a while, I know it still has a place in society. I think it simply has to accept that it has good competition and learn to adapt to change.
• United States
18 Sep 11
Tough. You will probably have to time travel to some cave in the ice age; and even then, I doubt you will be save from natural changes wrought by time.
@jazzyrae (1745)
• United States
17 Sep 11
i am not a big change person
@ShepherdSpy (8544)
• Omagh, Northern Ireland
15 Sep 11
I'd think that as consumers and Taxpayers in the US,You ARE already paying to keep their operation going.. So,is there an active downsizing policy in place already,or is the workforce being allowed to drop gradually,with retirement numbers not being matched by recruitment? Electronic transmission of documents and letters by fax got a boost as I recall during Postal strikes..The rise of Email and VOIP would also have reduced the volume of mail sent. Parcel Post,however will continue to be necessary,which may require some downsizing or a shift of focus for the business..Businesses are set up to service a requirement..changes in those requirements mean the business has to adapt,or else they could no longer have a market to service..It's a sad fact,but true..
• United States
16 Sep 11
You know, I have always wondered what the USPS employees actually protested. These people have really good benefits. Anyway, as you stated, "businesses are set up to service a requirement ... changes in those requirements mean the business has to adapt, or else they could no longer have a market to service." I used to have a US p.o box and had it for years (and while in school) to maintain address stability. I will never forget about 3 years ago, when for forgetfulness to pay my bi-annual fees in time and just 7 days late, the USPS gave away my long held p.o box. When I asked the postmaster why my long held p.o box was given away so fast, the reply was: "We have people in line waiting for a box." "You do not have people waiting in line, and will not have that much people in line soon," I replied and walked away. I was furious because my p.o box I had very young and held for years was a symbol of some stability in my life. I was aware that my case was an intentional act of malice. The post office called me days later and gave choice of several available boxes. I took one but later dropped it.
• Omagh, Northern Ireland
19 Sep 11
I can appreciate having something You'd relied on for so long being withdrawn as a blow...Did they not give you fair warning you would lose that box before your subscription was about to run out?
@peavey (16936)
• United States
15 Sep 11
No, I wouldn't and here's why. Like most businesses that have close connections with the government, the USPS is poorly run. There is a lot of waste and a lot of overhead that shouldn't be. I understand that it costs money to operate, but at this point, they should be looking to efficiency experts to help them. I don't think mail delivery has outlived its usefulness because there are many things that need to be physically delivered. Email and faxing are fine, but not everyone is on the internet, believe it or not. We still can't email official documents other than contracts because of security problems. And then there's something about a personal, hand written letter that is cherished. The UPS and similar services can take up the slack as far as packages go and I'm sure there will be other services stepping in to keep things going. The plain fact is that if a business can't change with the changing times, it's time for it to fail. Just like with GM and Chrysler, etc., being too big is no excuse for incompetence. No business is too big to fail. If they keep up with the times, give the customers what they want and need and pay attention to their own expenses, there's no reason they can't survive intact. But we know how that goes... Uncle Sam will probably bail them out and they will continue with their inefficiency and incompetence.
• United States
16 Sep 11
"The plain fact is that if a business can't change with the changing times, it's time for it to fail." I like that. Peavey, what changes do you think the USPS ought to make?
@SomeCowgirl (32190)
• United States
15 Sep 11
I wouldn't want to pay more to keep them open, no. However in a way, if they do close their doors it will put more strain on those places like USPS or FED EX, though more chains / more competitors might open their doors because of this. I just feel like, though, that the USPS should stay open. They have a creed to follow, and should uphold and follow it. Of course I've not followed the whole USPS drama in quite awhile myself. There are things like the "junk mail" that would be eliminated, though I guess in a way they'd just find a way to get our email addresses and we'd get more junk email... Meh.. some are still going to want their mail delivered to them, and know to their email inboxes.
• United States
16 Sep 11
What "creed" does the USPS have to follow?
@ircurts (112)
• United States
15 Sep 11
This is just too funny... As I saw this discussion title I was watching NCIS and Abby tells a co-worker, "if doesn't come electronically I am not getting it." I kind of agree with Abby but there are still so very many people not comfortable with email and Internet that it seems it's a must to keep it going still.
• United States
16 Sep 11
True that there is still need for the post office. The USPS just has to get grip of changes and adapt.