Someone can only be a better man, if he will be wiser. really?
By kendedes2011
@kendedes2011 (2712)
Indonesia
4 responses
@gengeni (3308)
• Indonesia
22 Sep 11
No.
Everything is a question of attitude.
Active social competence is not a question of clever - or stupid.
It depends on the education of the heart.
It depends on your self-chosen life-guiding principles.
What is your value system lived?
Lived affirmation for people living, honesty, truthfulness, sense of justice, reconciliation of interests, loyalty, helpfulness to help themselves, benevolence, trust?
For confidence, it takes courage, courage,
Without truthfulness, not instill confidence.
Without real trust, no humanity.
@saparidiki64 (594)
• Indonesia
22 Sep 11
Define "better person".
To draw conclusions from our mistakes and things better next time to address, each rat, each wolf ... any individual who has any sense in my head.
The pursuit of perfection is not really human, many have primarily different goals, which consist of a living to have the income to build a roof over your head and a family / friends group in which they communicate and exist can.
Many people are therefore better people because they have bugs that we know and appreciate and like - and they keep their mistakes against better knowledge.
It is as always the golden mean, a better person is one who remains human, not by itself close to others and is willing to accept others as they are.
@nanayangel (7879)
• Philippines
22 Sep 11
Hi there Kendedes 20!!
We usually learn from experience and mistakes and failures help us to be stronger and wiser if we value the lessons that we learned from them. It is important to attain wisdom which is to value things that are not of this world. Being empathetic and loving one another will make us become a better man. It happens when we understand the meaning and purpose and life and how much our manner of playing our role affects the outcome and the general tone of our lives.
@najibdina29 (1309)
• Indonesia
22 Sep 11
The statement contains too many unclear requirements in order to call them correctly, you can go to the example, assume that a person can be better. Unclear, however, is whether more than one other person as the same or at a later date. Or they can be open, with respect to what this refers more to whether a knowledge that can run like a voice command or a physical skill such as fast, or whether it is better understood in the sense of absolute goodness in itself.
So: not correct, but not incorrect.