Einstein was wrong???
By mrdobe
@mrdobe (25)
Italy
September 24, 2011 4:35am CST
Lately there has been a scientific discovery trying to proove Einsten was wrong on his relativity.It has been seen that neutrinos are faster than light and in the early 80's another scientist,Alain Aspect,found out that under certain situations an atom could comunicate istantly with another atom without problem of distance.A discovery trying to proove that the whole world is a hologram.Now the question is,is it possible that these Neutrinos took short ways with his reflections to get to his arrival?It's the holographic universe credible and last we know so lot of thing reacts under the relativity of Einstein,if neutrinos should be faster than light then what of all the rest?
1 person likes this
5 responses
@urbandekay (18278)
•
24 Sep 11
Actually, Einstein said nothing could accelerate past the speed of light, not that nothing could travel faster.
all the best urban
1 person likes this
all the best urban @bachyyy (195)
• Bulgaria
24 Sep 11
Now when the scientist discovered these neutrions our thinking about the World, the Universe is changed. For his time Einstein was right , but now we have got better technologies and the scientists can discover more and more . Einstein is the greatest scientist of 20th century , but now we are in the 21st.
@stk40m (1119)
• Koeln, Germany
10 Oct 11
I've read another article about that issue recently in the French newspaper Le Figaro:
http://www.lefigaro.fr/sciences/2011/10/08/01008-20111008ARTFIG00002-ces-particules-qui-bousculent-la-theorie-d-einstein.php
Unfortunately none of the articles says how much faster actually the neutrinos were they measured. From a 1987 report (about a supernova explosion) I concluded that they would only be slightly faster (the articles says: merely 3 hours difference for a voyage of 168.000 years!). As their mass is unknown I could imagine that they are even lighter than light particles aka photons. Maybe that's what makes them just a little bit faster. So scientists may have to replace the value of c by the velocity value of neutrinos. The results of the equations probably won't change much if they do.
Cheers
@chicksdigscars (5483)
•
27 Sep 11
i'm not all clued into science etc so i'm not going to sit here and pretend that i am.. but i think considering how many years, and how much other things have been based around einsten's theorys, it would take more than one thing to disprove it all.. it'll be looked into further, majorly.
