How do you watch the political primary debates?

@bagarad (14283)
Paso Robles, California
October 19, 2011 12:25am CST
If you are an American, do you watch the primary debates for your party? If so, where and with whom do you watch them? Our local tea party group now has a tradition where we all go to Round Table Pizza and eat together there in a reserved room with three big screen TV's. It's much more fun to watch them in a group of like-minded folks and eat together than to watch them at home alone or just with the family. Afterwards, we discuss them and take our own straw poll. Tonight we had one vote for who we thought won the debate and another for who we most would want to vote for. Our winners seem to change from week to week. If you are not an American, what do you think of candidates debating each other on TV so that people can better learn their positions? Our primary elections are to determine which candidate will represent our party. Currently the Republican Party has eight or nine candidates in the debate. Tonight only eight of the nine showed up. I don't know if the other one just dropped out or if he was protesting something about the location or format of the debate. I think I knew, but now I've forgotten. By the way, the tea party is a movement -- not a political party. So we were watching the Republican Party primary debates.
3 people like this
11 responses
@thesids (22180)
• Bhubaneswar, India
19 Oct 11
Hi bagarad I am a Non American. Last elections they did telecast a few debates from US and I felt that you guys have a great sense of responsibility when it comes to debates and also the results. I loved to see that you people are so very well mannered and also headed in the right direction even when it is politics. Unfortunately, Indian politics and its so called public debates - they are more of fights and nothing interests me in those. It is only a blame game that went public and they can go to any levels to show that they are superior or whatever. I stopped voting since the past two elections and will NOT waste my time to go to the camps and vote or even if they make it online, I am no one to be bothered. Who ever wins will be corrupt and have some criminal record. And I dont want to cast my precious vote to anyone of their sorts.
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
19 Oct 11
That is so sad! Our system isn't perfect, nor are our politicians. We certainly have plenty of corruption in Washington D.C and in the governments of many states and cities. But our people do have the power to throw the bums out if they get properly organized and help inform ignorant voters. Our schools and our media seem to work for the liberals in our government, but our conservatives would like to clean house. The question is whether we will be able to do enough house cleaning in this next election to make a difference. Some people will believe anything a politician says because they can't face up to the truth. It's like a person who goes to a doctor who promises he will cure them of cancer and it won't hurt a bit, and he gives the person placebos and says they will work. The truth comes when it gets worse and it becomes too late to cure it. People will vote for the person who promises the most goodies and the least pain, and then when he gets into office they found the words weren't true. People don't want to give up anything to fix the real problems because it might hurt -- just like surgery hurts before healing comes. Our American Revolution and our Civil War were both very painful for the entire country, but both were necessary to fix problems in America. We now need a bloodless revolution at the ballot box to fix another major problem -- too much debt and too many unnecessary government regulations that our strangling our businesses and causing widespread unemployent -- not to mention the corruption in our justice department.
@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
19 Oct 11
I watch it on the big screen tv at home and usually it is not the whole one, just bits and pieces. I usually catch the high lights on Fox News or on You tube. I think Romney is doing a good job of detracting the others. I know that there are a lot of people for Herman Cain, but I think part of the reason is his charismatic personality and his deep voice (being black has those advantages), but remembering that Obama got in partly for those reasons. Plus that stupid white guilt that some other whites have . I wish Romney would be a bit more conservative, but at least he is against illegal immigration.
@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
20 Oct 11
I wish Christie had entered the race and also Trump because I get the feeling that these two would have defeated Obama, but they did not get the call,etc. I do not like it when two good ones leave so another who would get the black Republican vote gets in. And if Cain becomes president, that means that if the democrats want to defeat him they would have to put up another black candidate, then if he gets in, the republicans would have to put up another black candidate. Whereas if it were about religion then the colour of the skin wold not matter. I do not like the 9-9-9 as it takes time to change the present tax rates and the poorer people would not have to pay taxes. The trouble is that it is who ha the money, and I do like Gingrich. I remember when he was the speaker of the house and he was very good, but do not know that much about the other candidates. except for Bachman, but then again she might have a bit of trouble because of the media was against Sarah Palin as well.
@stary1 (6612)
• United States
20 Oct 11
I am leaning toward Romney too...though I love the idea of Cain vs Obama. I would like to quiet those who claim people are not for Oabam because they are racist and Cain would surely accomplish that.. I have thought I might like to see a Romney/Cain ticket...
2 people like this
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
20 Oct 11
I don't know who I'm for yet. Romney is a bit too slick for me to believe. Perry seemed good at first, but he's lost me with his willingness to bicker and for giving illegal immigrants in-state tuition. I'm not real fond of 9-9-9, but I think Cain is believable, honest, will admit when he's been wrong, and has a large dose of common sense and has demonstrated that he knows how to work hard and turn failing companies around. I like Gingrich because he's smart and keeps his eyes on how to defeat Obama -- not those on the same team. He doesn't criticize everyone else. And I'd love to see him debate Obama, who probably would run from that challenge. Newt has a lot of knowledge and experience on important committees and would probably make a good president -- he just may not be electable. I like Santorum because he stands for what he believes in, as does Bachman. I agree with Paul on financial matters, but I think he'd be weak on defense. I'd personally like to make a big collage of all of them and vote for it.
1 person likes this
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
8 Nov 11
"How do you watch the political primary debates?" With a bottle of whiskey and a big fat joint. Seriously. I do. I'm kinda a junkie so i watch all party debates. I even watched the 3rd party collective debate for the last presidential election between the candidates for the Green Party, libertarian party, Constitution party and Ralph Nader. I prefer to watch them with a mix of minds rather than a group of like minded folks. Kinda a boring conversation if everyone is sitting around agreeing with each other, lol.
1 person likes this
@drannhh (15219)
• United States
22 Feb 12
I don't watch that stuff, but I do read the transcripts sometimes on the internet. But in general my attitude is, hey, if it didn't make the Drudge Report it is probably not worth knowing. RFLOL.
1 person likes this
@drannhh (15219)
• United States
25 Feb 12
RFLMAO! Aren't those annoying! I can read faster than they can talk so I'd rather get my information that way, since the time I can spend doing that sort of thing is quite limited. About the only thing I watch on TV is golf.
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
24 Feb 12
I like to watch the debates and find them entertaining - especially when the tea party group watches them together at the pizza Parlor on their big screen. Unfortunately they didn't do that last night and I had to try live streaming on my computer. I think my blood pressure must have very very high because every time someone started an especially good comment in response to a question, the streaming would stop on CNN (probably At&T's fault) and this little red circle would spin around for a few seconds. After this happened about three times, I would stop responding at all. Then I would have to refresh the page and that meant watching the stupid 30-second Volt commercial again (saw it three times last night) before I could see the debate again. There were some very good action scenes I did get to see to completion, but I can tell you I hate that spinning red circle and the Volt commercial. There are things I like about most of the candidates, and I enjoy watching them interact.
1 person likes this
@dorannmwin (36392)
• United States
21 Oct 11
Actually, I don't really identify myself with one political party, I'm more of an independent and for that reason I don't really pay attention to the primary debates because I don't even have the opportunity to make any kind of a decision until the actual election comes around. If I was a member of one party or the other, then I would probably pay attention to the debates, but I honestly think that I would be watching them in the comfort of my own home.
1 person likes this
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
21 Oct 11
I have aligned myself with the party I'm most sympathetic to so that I can vote in the primaries and have a voice in who at least one of the candidates will be. I can still vote for anyone I choose in the general election if I think my party's candidate is inferior to the other candidate.
@inertia4 (27960)
• United States
21 Oct 11
Oh boy. I have seen some of them. But I have to say that the republicans have no one good at all running. Ok, maybe Mitt Romney. But I am not a fan of any of them. They seem to be funny, circus type shows. Also, all the candidates all seem to be lying. I am neither a republican nor a democrat. I do not believe in any of these politicians. They will say anything to get elected. Then they change. Its all about the, not us the people, so no matter who becomes president, does not matter. Also, congress is where the main problem is. But watching them when there is nothing else on can be entertaining to watch these grown men act like fools and argue with each other. It's a laugh.
@inertia4 (27960)
• United States
21 Oct 11
I still believe that anyone of them will promise the world just to get elected. Look, I like Obama, but he is against the wall with congress being mostly republican and that make it hard for him. The one thing that I do not understand from him is why he always backed down and gave into everything they wanted. That to me makes no sense. I know that most republican presidents do to back off issues and fight it tooth and nail, well, maybe with the exception of G.W. Bush. He was just a puppet. I think Bill Clinton did a wonderful job dealing with congress and getting his way at the same time. This country seems to have lost it's ability to control itself. If you look at passed debates, whether republican or democrat, there was a passion with the candidates. Now it seems to be more like children fighting over some stupid toy or something. I have seen part of the debates and I do not see any passion for country. It just seems to be all about themselves. That turns me off and scares me at the same time. I believe that President Obama has a passion for the country but seem to lack the ability to fight for what he believes in. This country is in major trouble and we cannot go and blame Obama or Bush for that matter. What is happening here now is something that was snowballing from I would say the Kennedy days. It seems to me that the politicians have become more and more greedy as the years went on. I have a bitter taste for anyone who becomes president now. Someone has to take control. There is way too much focus on "The Parties" then there should be. It is not about left or right or republican or democrat. It's about america and the people. I have always believed that there should be no homeless or hungry people in this rich country of ours. Thats why I say the system is broken. Times have changed, we do have to embrace the new world and technology, that is out future. I hope that you didn't mind my little rant.
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
21 Oct 11
I wish you felt differently about the political process. No president can accomplish his promises without the cooperation of Congress. What is needed is a team that has the right ideas and the character to work with Congress to get problems solves. There are some I would have absolutely no confidence in to know or do what is right for the country. There are some I think would do a better job if Congress works with them. That's why I listen carefully to what all of them say week after week to see who stays consistent and presents specific plans or tells you where you can get the details. Details are hard to share in such a limited time. I watch the faces -- especially the eyes. I read as much as I can to stay informed and learn about the candidate's record. Has he or she kept campaign promises before? Do I like what this person did? If he could implement his ideas, would it be good for the country? If someone promises change, I want a few more detainss, thanks. I want to know just what changes that candidate wants to bring about before I give away my vote.
1 person likes this
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
19 Oct 11
That would be a fun way to listen to the debates! I haven't been watching them except for any snippets I've caught on news programs.. It's too early for me, but if I did it like you would it would be very interesting!
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
20 Oct 11
So invite a few friends over and order out for pizza. You miss a lot when you don't see the whole thing. They are actually quite entertaining. The soundbites are chosen by what the media want you to hear to favor the candidate they'd like to see win. I have seen all of every debate so far and they all provide information about the candidates that is useful. I still haven't been able to make up my mind. The next step is to check out their web sites and see the details of their plans. The more involved people get in politics and discussing issues with their friends and neighbors, the better informed they will be when it's time to vote. In the early days of America, people used to sit around in the pubs and discuss politics with their neighbors. No one should have to decide whom to vote for by listening to campaign commerecials and news analysts who are not objective. Listen to the candidates themselves. Some will be having YouTube presentations. Only as people get involved with the issues and start tryng to find real solutions will we see this country turn around. We need to find someone with character and the perseverance to keep working on real solutions -- not just promises with no specifics. I have discovered that most bills in Congress are named the opposite of what they will really do. Then Congressmen are afraid to oppose a bad bill even if it has a name like The American Jobs Act or the Clean Water Bill. They know few people will look into what the bill actually says and will do, and they often base their positions solely on the bill's name and what the politicians say is in it.
@stephcjh (38473)
• United States
20 Oct 11
I used to watch them but not anymore. It really gets on my nerves to hear all of the lies being told. They get voted in and make things worse and do nothing they had promised to do.
1 person likes this
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
20 Oct 11
To do anything in Washington, you have to have a majority in both houses of Congress adn the Presidency. Obama had all of that for the first two years. No Republican could do anything to stop what he wanted to do. He can't blame everything on his. predecessor. Keep in mind that the media and the adminstration also can't be relied upon to tell the truth. If one doesn't listen to what the people who run or might run this country are saying and try to discern who is really speaking the truth and who is being less than honest, one deserves the government one gets.
@pergammano (7682)
• Canada
19 Oct 11
Sorry, dear friend..not from the U.S., AM interested in "big brother's" politics..BUT, debates really aren't what I think they should be...even in my country...I think they are "grandstanding" and "bashing" events that spend more time assassinating each other's characters...than ISSUES!
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
20 Oct 11
Our Mr. Romney and Mr. Perry seem to keep butting heads and I think it makes people think less of both of them. Maybe their antics will cause people to pay more attention to the other candidates who "play nice."
@twallace (2675)
• United States
19 Oct 11
There was no one special that I was watching it with. It was something that I don't really watch. But it has been on the news so much to the point that I had to see what all the fuss was about. Now if I didn't now any better it was like a group of kids in the school yard fussing about what the other one did wrong. It's was funny to a degree but I know they should have stuck to the important issues at hand. I understand that everyone is upset with the president for not working as fast as they would like. Yet as Americans' we are forgetting something. These things were already in place and there were things that Bush and those before him had already caused. Now you can't put everything on the president when the republicans and demo crates are not working with the man to better things for the people. What ever they do in office will always affect those that are the minority. There are alot of people that fall in that braket and they know it. Look at all of the people that have been out of work and still can't find jobs. So you tell me when you know that the country is working outside of the US. Cause cost is cheaper than working in the US. That is one of the things that they have forgotten about. There are so many things wrong and they can't put all of it on the president.
1 person likes this
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
20 Oct 11
No, everything can't be blamed on one man. That's why we have to clean house in Congress, not just in the White House. Congress passed laws that helped bring about the financial mess, and two Congressmen in particular, Chris Dodd and Barney Frank, have the most to do with this by imposing regulations on the banks that practically forced them to make the bad loans that caused the defaults on mortages and the high number of foreclosures. Then those two point to everyone else as the cause for what they started. It's also true that both parties were convinced by someone that we needed to have the TARP and the bail-outs. They were all wrong. A few good people made it to Congress last election, but some of the worst crooks are still there. We need people on all levels who are more interested in the good of the country than in what they can get for themselves with their crony capitalism but the answer is not socialism. That will simply make everyone equally poor. Any serious person with common sense knows you can't spend more than you make. The government hasn't learned that yet. You could make the rich pay everything they have in taxes and it would not solve the budget problems we have. The government has to make some big spending cuts and they will be painful for everyone. Half of our population is used to taking and giving very little if anything back in taxes. That isn't fair, either.
@stary1 (6612)
• United States
20 Oct 11
bagarad What a great idea...I have begun to lose interest in the debates, but I bet if I were with a crowd or even a few people I could be more interested.
1 person likes this
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
20 Oct 11
Yup. I'ts much more fun that way. If you dont have a public place that wants the extra business, invite a few people over and send out for pizza or Chinese food or whatever. Maybe you can even havea potluck. Then have some discussions afterwards about that you think of what was said and really listen to those who disagree with you and think crtically about what they say and be ready to give your own reasons for disagreeing if their opinions didn't impress you. The more we know about issues, the better off we will be. Invite people who are normally interested in politics. They might come to a "party."