casino royale is good or bad?????
By satlove
@satlove (1110)
India
9 responses
@sou7887 (1164)
• India
7 Dec 06
I was surprised at how this one was paced. Its almost compeltely front loaded, with all the big action sequences seeming to happen in the first 40 minutes. That was one reason the movie threw me, and one reason I expect I will like it much more upon subsequent viewings (not that I didn't like it this time)
@sou7887 (1164)
• India
7 Dec 06
was amazed how much Craig looked like Steve McQueen often. In fact, I'm more stimulated to go back and watch Bulitt than I am any of the original Bonds. I expected him to be good, but I was suprised at just how much range they actually did give him- and Craig aced it- He sells this character really well (actually completely , imo). The problem that will remain for a lot of people is that this character is not Sean Connery or Pierce, or Timothy or Roger. Craig is playing a character that doesn't owe anything to any of the other actors who did it before him, and for me, that's exciting. For some people that may be a big stumbling block, and just compounded by the iconoclastic pacing of the entire movie.
@chintoosk (445)
• India
20 Nov 06
it's a difference.....no fancy gadgets like brosnan movies......going back to the old bonds.......
@nautiyal_rohit (2928)
• India
20 Nov 06
Its ok not so thrilling as earlier editions and daniel dosent suti for BOND