Owning a Pet When You Cannot Afford a Vet?

United States
October 23, 2011 7:48pm CST
When people are talking about their pets being sick or hurt, and asking what they should do. Most of the time, people will advise them to take the animal to the vet. Sometimes, the person will say they can't because they cannot afford it. And I have heard people say, MANY times, "If you can't afford to take care of a pet then you shouldn't own one!" In a way, I agree with this. However, at the same time, I don't... or I don't feel that strongly about it. I have a dog, but I am poor and wouldn't be able to afford an expensive vet bill. We take of her the best way we can, and love her very much. How do you feel about the issue? Do you think that rich or poor, you can have a pet. Or, do you think that if you cannot afford a pet, you shouldn't own one, point blank? All opinions and views welcome! So, let's share our opinions and discuss!
3 people like this
16 responses
• United States
24 Oct 11
Yes as a pet owner it is the responsibility to assure the pet is well taken care of. I won't say that if one can't afford to pay a vet one should not own a pet, but it is important that when they do get sick and it is beyond our own caring that we do what it takes to assure they get well. I currently do not have a pet, simply because my landlord is a meany and will not allow them in our building. But if I could I would make sure mine was taken care of well and assured it got their exams, shots and or to the vet when sick. How would I manage, would be to carefully think about this before hand and save a bit on the side to assure I could and or make payment arrangements with the vet. This is what I did while raising my kids, who were well taken care of. So the same would apply to my pet as I would feel he is part of my family.
2 people like this
• United States
24 Oct 11
Yes, you're right. It's absolutely the responsibility of the pet owner to make sure their pet is well taken care of. With my situation, our dog gets fed, loved, and cared for as far as bathing, trimming nails, etc. But, if she was to suddenly get sick... we would unfortunately be unable to take her to the vet and pay an expensive bill. We would only be able to try our best to research/ask to find out exactly what is wrong, and treat it the best we can.
• United States
24 Oct 11
One of the neighbors was asked to get rid of the pet and or move. The neighbor decided to move. This landlord has several buildings and is a stickler about pets. Too bad he is this way as I really would keep the pet well taken care of and assure that the surroundings do not get damaged. I guess he is afraid that not everyone would be the same.
24 Oct 11
i loveeeeeee hardworkinggirls part of her comment.. "i do not own a pet because our landlord is a meanie" haha fantastic. i had a landlord who didn't allow pets, but i got a pet anyway lol.. and the landlord came round one day unannounced, and she fell inlove with her. and we've been allowed her since lol!
• United States
24 Oct 11
Well sometimes things happen. I am a pet owner. We never adopted an animal without the means to care for them. That said my hubby lost his job in April. He has been doing odd jobs and short term jobs but hasn't been able to get a permanent full time job. We are lucky that we have a vet right now who will work with us. Let me do some office work to pay for everyone's shots this year and so on. I sub there for the secretaries when they need me as well building up a credit for when we need it. One cat has allergies and needs a shot every three months or so. We did not take on our pets irresponsibly but life has changed. They are our pets but they are family to us. To get rid of my children's animals who are so much a part of their lives is unthinkable and I pray life gets better before we even have to think about it. Yes our dogs are with family members right now. When we where flooded we had no where to live and they where taken in by my folks and grandparents. None like cats and we found a place to live that will let us bring them along. This was a tough choice and my second daughter has cried every night for the last month because her dog is not there to sleep with her. Breaking my heart it is. I do think buying or adopting a pet when you know you cannot take care of them is irresponsible. Just like having a child when you cannot afford to care for them properly and you know that. That is for those who know they cannot care for them from the beginning, life happens, people deal with it the best they can.
• United States
24 Oct 11
Yes, I think it's a bit different when you got the pets when you could afford them, but something happened and now you are unable to. You could then give your pets to someone who could afford them, but it's not always that easy. Many pets become part of the family, and giving them up can be like giving one of your kids up!
1 person likes this
• United States
24 Oct 11
I too hate medications, but sometimes, they are needed. I love trying new home remedies, and I often search for home remedies on the web. Some of them are really handy and interesting. Sometimes, home remedies sound ridiculous, but you never know until you try!
@ShepherdSpy (8544)
• Omagh, Northern Ireland
24 Oct 11
Ok,You love Your Dog..but how would you feel being unable to pay for the treatment if it was sick or injured where Vet care would be the best thing to help? It would be stressful for You both financially and emotionally, watching the dog suffer while you were unable to help..
• United States
24 Oct 11
I agree, it wouldn't feel good knowing she needed a vet and we couldn't afford it. But, we would do everything in our power to help her. We'd do research to find out what is most likely wrong with her, and then we would see if there are any home remedies or treatments for it. My fiance has to do the same thing if he gets hurt of sick. We have to figure out whats wrong and what treatments we could do on our own. We can't afford a doctor/hospital bill either, and he doesn't have any help like medicaid (insurance).
1 person likes this
@Galena (9110)
24 Oct 11
I think that when you have a pet, you have a responsibility to care for them. if they need medical treatment, you pay for it. somehow. fortunately there is insurance for pets, so large bills are easier to manage. some medical treatment can run to thousands of pounds, and without insurance, that would be impossible for a lot of people. as I keep rats, their medical bills are usually very small. they CAN be operated on, but it's very risky as they don't cope well under anaesthetic, so unless it was a very young rat, and the operation was something that would let them regain full quality of life and have a normal lifespan, then I would be very unlikely to consider operating. not because of the costs, but because it's not likely to do much good. so there is little use in insuring them. I had one that needed her teeth trimmed about once a month, and another that was very prone to respiratory infections. each of the visits only cost about £25, and I would never begrudge them a penny of it. I do think that with things like dogs and cats though, it's essential to have them insured so that if they need expensive treatment, you don't need to worry about whether you can get a loan or find the cash.
@Galena (9110)
24 Oct 11
you should look into it. It's very common in the UK. even some supermarkets run pet insurance schemes. so there's bound to be some in the US. it's definitely a good idea. when I was last at the vet, I overheard someone paying a £12,450 bill for their dog. without insurance, it wouldn't be an option for many many people.
• United States
24 Oct 11
I have never heard of anything like that for pets here in the US, so maybe they don't have it in the US. But, I'll definitely look into it to check. It would definitely help!
• United States
24 Oct 11
I didn't know there was insurance for pets!? How do get insurance for your pet, in the USA? I had no idea they had anything like that for pets, it seems like a great option for those who may not have a lot of money.
@krajibg (11922)
• Guwahati, India
24 Oct 11
Hi Angell, There is a ,maxim in English, "Ct your coat according to your cloth" Yes, if you do not have sufficient fund to provide the pet what it needs, why do keep it? Not only me other people too would pass the same comment. They could go even to conclude that what you are doing is mere an affective. What I would do is to sell that pet and until I am economically sound I would not go or these pets. are economical sound.
@krajibg (11922)
• Guwahati, India
26 Oct 11
Thats what I wanted to say. Though most of we we grown ups feel they are not to be taught anything else now since they have acquired as they are wise, are in false notion. If they are not in touch with the present scenario and developments they arre in my opinion are useless people and should be put to their due.
• United States
24 Oct 11
I think it would be best if people would not get a pet knowing they are not in a good financial situation. But I think it's a little bit different when you got the pet when you were doing okay financially, and then something happens and you no longer have good money. Some pets are like part of the family, and it's no that easy just to get rid of them. You wouldn't get rid of your child just because you are going through a rough patch with money, would you?
• United States
24 Oct 11
I have mixed views on this as well. On one hand, animals are bound to get sick with old age, and if someone can't afford to pay for it - Are they doing it an injustice by getting them in the first place? Could the pet find a home with someone who could afford the bills? It's such a tough call. On the other hand, so many pets don't even have a chance of experiencing what it's like to be loved in a home in the first place, so just to experience a loving environment may be very healthy for them, even if in the future they may have lacking health care due to their owner's financial situation. I just feel like most animals would rather be adopted, taken care of, shown love and affection as much as they can, and take the risk...As opposed to them sitting in shelters, pet shops, etc. and never experiencing love at all.
• United States
24 Oct 11
Thanks for responding lilblondiemjd! I agree with you. That is pretty much how I feel about the situation. I am not one to go around telling people they shouldn't have a pet if they can't afford it, because I don't entirely agree with that and I would be a hypocrite. For me, if/when my dog gets sick or hurt I will do my best to research and figure out what I can do myself at home.
1 person likes this
@Hatley (163776)
• Garden Grove, California
24 Oct 11
hi angelee I love animals and we seldom went to the vet yet we had a dog and a cat and they stayed healthy too. we loved both dearly but unfortunately we had to sell our house and move to an apartment so we had to find good homes for both of them then we were doomed to no pets most apts.we could afford all has the same lousy rules no pets.Oh you could have fish but to me fish are ot pets at all.But really you can do a lot yourselves to keep dogs and cats healthy without expensive vet bills.
• United States
24 Oct 11
Thanks for responding! Where did your avatar go? I agree. There are many things you can do to keep your pets happy and healthy yourself, as well as treat them yourself when they have minor problems.
@bunnybon7 (50973)
• Holiday, Florida
24 Oct 11
i never say that to someone as there are 2 reasons they may have a pet they cant take to the vet. when you have children, they bring in pets that need a home and want to keep them. when you are older like me, you may have gotten the pet when you had money for vets, like myself. then, the economy has caused you to cut back on vet bills, like me. ive been putting off taking coco till yesterday for her shots and check up. it cost me 80 bucks i coudnt afford but am going to do without some things for it myself.
• United States
24 Oct 11
Yes, I think the economy has put a lot of people in that same situation, including myself. It's not easy for some to just get rid of their pet because they can no longer afford vet bills or anything. Some pets are considered part of the family, and like I said below, you wouldn't give your kid away just because you're having a hard time with money... you'd just have to do the best you could to take care of them.
@marguicha (223019)
• Chile
5 Nov 11
The question is not that simple. It is as if people should not have children if they are not rich enough to give them all sorts of things (good schooling, a good health insurance, good school). Yet love is a lot more important than all that. And I think that instead of saying that people who love dogs but cannot affort a vet, there should be a free vet service for those people and their pets.
@umabharti (3972)
• India
24 Oct 11
yes friend ,when we can not afford for the vet then it is really a bad feeling that we can t look after the pet in proper way. I am saying if there is a necessity to go to the vet then should make some or the other arrange ment for that.
@katie0 (5203)
• Japan
29 Oct 11
I'm sure what the Animals in the world needs first it's love, we should stop eating, testing and wearing them and when one wants to have a pet their love is the most important thing. Now if they get sick both Animal and Owner will suffer a lot if they don't have the means to take the poor Animal to a vet. But still, love is the most important thing cause then the owner won't just dump the animal on the streets, will give many happy memories to the animal and that's what matter the most.
• Canada
7 Jan 12
this is were i am glad were i live it is illegal not to take your animal to a vet if it is sick. if you live in a country ere you have to pay for health care and your kid becomes sick child services will take your kid away if you do not get them health care they require it should be the same everywhere for animals as well
@whatrow (792)
• United States
13 Nov 11
Nobdy can dictate to anyone else what they should or should not do. If you want a pet, get a pet. Of course there are going to be problems which will require expensive treatments. But that shouldn't stop you. The most important thing you can give to your pet when he is hurting is love. And that is for free. Some of my pets have been sick. And, I can't afford a vet. But, I learned something. In MOST cases, animals have the power to recover from illnesses without any treatment. Of course, it happens faster with a vet. And it is easier on the animal. But, just because your pet is sick, that doesn't mean it will die because you can't bring him in.
• United States
24 Oct 11
I think that if you can't afford a pet, you shouldn't get one (unless you somehow get stuck with one). But if you already have the pet and you end up with a lower income and it would be impossible to pay an expensive vet bill, then just be very careful with your pet. It's not as likely that you'll ever have an expensive bill than it is that the pet will be emotionally scarred by being given away from its owner of many years. Besides, most people (I think) probably could ask their parents for a couple hundred dollars now and then if they really needed it, especially for a living animal. So even for people with not a lot of money, it wouldn't be that bad to have a pet.
• United States
24 Oct 11
Wow JLSTLMN, that's a good idea! I think that would definitly work for those who want to have a pet, but can't afford the expenses of vet bills, spaying/neutering, shots, medications, etc. For me, I already have a dog... so it wouldn't work for me right now. But, I will DEFINITELY keep your idea in mind for the future if I ever have more pets. Also, I will share your idea with others who want a pet but cannot afford the expenses. Thanks for responding JLSTLMN, you brought a nice addition to the discussion! @sacredcow, I agree. However, not everyone can ask their parents for money... as sometimes the parents are in the same or worse financial condition.
• United States
24 Oct 11
As a pet owner for many years (dogs and cats--always at the same time), I found this topic really interesting. Admittedly, when I was younger and we got our pets, we probably shouldn't have because we couldn't afford the vet care. But we did and they all lived to ripe old ages (in fact, I just had to have one of my cats put to sleep after raising her and having her for 18 years). Luckily, now many years later we are much more financially stable and I was able to afford to have the vet take care of this, as well as have her cremated and get an urn for her ashes. As I was reading these posts, I thought of another option for people who are wanting a cat or a dog (or multiples) but really don't have the resources to cover vet bills, etc. Most no-kill shelters are desperately seeking foster homes. My daughter has fostered many animals--and it seems that when they come to her house, they stay. The shelter gets discounted vet services and, since the animal technically belongs to them, they cover spaying/neutering, shots, medications, etc. So, you get all the joys of the love of a pet without most of the financial responsibility. Plus, you get the joy of knowing that you're saving an animal.
@carmelanirel (20942)
• United States
24 Oct 11
I am like you, but doubly so.. Ironically it was my husband's idea to get two dogs, and I don't regret it, but it does cost us twice as much for their care..what ticks me off though is, my husband's instructions were, "You guys, (my son and I) take take of the dogs, feeding, bathing, grooming, etc.. and I will pay for their needs, food, vet bill, flea drops. Yet so far I have paid the vet at least once or twice, and have paid out of my pocket for fleas drops many times.. I can't afford it, my income is mylot and whenever I can get a dog sitting job, I don't have a regular paycheck every other week like he does... So, though they both did get their checkup and shots this year, they are way over due for flea drops that is going to cost us $30.00, which isn't bad for a 3 month dosage, except with two dogs, I need two packages, ($60.00) for a 3 month treatment..
• Philippines
24 Oct 11
Buying a pet is really expensive and so, that would mean that if you buy one, you should make sure to take good care of it. One of the ways to take good care of a pet is by taking it to a vet. Like people, pets need to have their vaccinations. It's one way of keeping them healthy. But I do know a lot of people who have pets but they don't take them to the vet. I guess it's just okay. But as for me, I make sure that my pets are updated with their different vaccines.