I own a gun, and know how to use it, so maybe I can qualify for the job...

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
October 26, 2011 4:27pm CST
I keep hearing about how loans are predatory because the people loaning the money somehow left he borrower with no choice but to borrow the money. Some in the Occupy Movement are even going so far as to paint students and graduates who use(d) school loans as victims. As if someone held a gun to their heads, forcing them to accept the loans. So how do I get that job? I have a gun, I'm trained in how to use it, so what other qualifications do I need? Where do I send my resume? LOL
1 person likes this
7 responses
@froggy57 (26)
• United States
27 Oct 11
Are you stupid? Of course they had to get the loan.. how else to get through college? We are culturally conditioned to believe we have to have college to 'get ahead'. To be a success. If we don't go to college we're a loser. We are all victims of the 1% who own the government and own the country. Time to take it back. Screw you, you wall street shill.
@dragon54u (31634)
• United States
27 Oct 11
Hey froggy, welcome to myLot! You'll find a lot of lively discussions here but we generally refrain from calling each other names. You can't take these things personally, it's just discussion after all and sharing opinions. How do you get through college? Well, I worked while I was in college and so did my mom. She graduated when she was 50. She worked full time while raising us and dealing with a sad divorce and it took her 7 years but she did it while supporting herself and us. I worked my way through, too, but decided after a year that I wanted to work full time--I regret that decision but I could have finished college on my own. Not in 4 years, maybe in 6 years, but I'd graduate debt free. Community colleges are cheaper, we didn't have those back then, but that's another option for saving money. You don't have to borrow to go to college if you choose the school wisely and make some sacrifices. I hope you enjoy here at myLot and have fun with all the differing opinions.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
28 Oct 11
I didn't have to get the loan. I worked my way through college to get my bachelor's degree. It took me longer than some people, but I did it without a loan. I was in a hurry to get a masters so I took out a student loan to get me through that. Still, I didn't HAVE TO. I CHOSE TO. There are plenty of people who don't get a college degree and do just fine. Construction workers often make more money than I do and they don't need a college education. Same thing goes for plumbers. Bill Gates never finished college and he's the richest man in the country. I'm not a victim of any 1%. I'm just a guy who chose my path like everyone else. My path didn't involve the sacrifices necessary to be filthy rich, nor did it involve playing the victim and blaming others for the fact that I'm not rich.
@jjzone44 (917)
• United States
26 Oct 11
It's not about forcing someone to take a loan. When a person is in the position to require a loan, they go to a bank to obtain it. Since the bank is the professional in this transaction, it is up to them to determine how much money a borrower can afford to repay. When the banker fails to do that, you can't really blame a consumer. It would be akin to an orthopedic surgeon suggesting a knee replacement for a patient who can't walk because they are paraplegic. It would be irresponsible for a doctor to perform that surgery, since the doctor is considered a professional.
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
27 Oct 11
When you take out money for a student loan you can only get the amount allowed. This is also true of other loans such as a car or mortgage loan. And banks as a rule have NEVER loaned money to people who (at the time of the loan) they thought actually needed a loan.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
27 Oct 11
Oh wow! Tell me, do you also blame the cop for catching you speeding? Loan officers and student loan councilors advise people on the maximum amount the institution is willing to loan the student. They don't force anyone to take the maximum, or even the loan. Your analogy doesn't even work, since doctors don't force surgery on anyone.. in fact, if they tried, they can lose their licenses. They advise you on your medical condition, then YOU decide what you want to do.. including get a second opinion.. or do nothing.
@jjzone44 (917)
• United States
27 Oct 11
That is exactly my point, that's why I said suggest surgery, not compel it. You ask a physician for their opinion because they are the professional when it comes to healthcare. Performing surgery that has little or no chance of improving the quality of life is unethical. Sub-prime loans, toxic debt, bad paper, call it what you want, but predatory lenders were manipulating the numbers so it would appear that a person could actually borrow more than they could afford. In fact the definition of sub-prime loans includes the line that it is lending to borrowers who may have difficulty with meeting the repayment schedule. And since the loan officer is the professional in this case, it was up to them to tell a potential borrower about the potential risk. But many of the predatory lenders did not do that, in fact they made the loans, told the borrowers that property values would continue to rise (speculation), and for those that wanted to re-finance, they often told people they could have extra money to pay off other bills or use how they wished. You can never guarantee that a security is going to increase in value. And it is not advisable to roll known decreasing value assets (like cars) into a mortgage as that loan is on an asset that should increase in value over time. I own stock, and I expect my stockbroker (the professional) to properly advise me to not only buy stock with good upside potential, but limit my exposure to the downside potential. But I know he cannot guarantee that any security is going to increase in value, and he can't know every downside before it occurs. In fact in the agreements I signed I had to agree to this very fact. The patient is a doctor's customer, and if they force someone to undergo surgery, they can be sued and they can lose their license. The borrower is the lender's customer. What happened to the lenders who wrote the toxic debt? Did they lose their license? Did they get sued? I know that a lot of people (borrowers) lost their homes. Oh and the speeding ticket? When you purchase a car, you rely on the manufacturer that the speedometer is accurate, and the speed sensing equipment used by the police is accurate. Prove either of them inaccurate, and the ticket is null and void.
@urbandekay (18278)
27 Oct 11
Caveat emptor, as we say all the best urban
• Belgium
27 Oct 11
Alright, you make some fair points. Indeed, it is up to the individuals to repay their debt and no one forced them, at gunpoint, to take those loans. However, I think that's a vast oversimplification of the OWS arguments. I really doubt most of them are out there to demand that government pay for their student loans. The main argument seems to be - and I think we can all agree on this regardless of party affiliations - that the tuition fees are much, much too high. As a result, most Americans start off their lives with a massive debt. Now, indeed, they made the choice to incur that debt. However, let's be realistic, having a degree nowadays is basically a requirement to get a decent job. Just compare the unemployment rate between those that have college degrees and those that just have high school diplomas. Now, unless you have some good scholarships or are extremely wealthy, the only way to pay for college is through loans. So we're stuck with a terrible college system. By the time the students get their degrees they're faced with a poor economy through no fault of their own. Getting a job to pay back that debt just isn't that simple. So I would posit that that's where most of the frustration is coming from when it comes to student loans.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
27 Oct 11
Exactly! College fees, books and tuition are skyrocketing. However, have you noticed that there are no calls for investigations or the government (state universities are government entities after all) putting caps on such things? NO! The government protects the scams and gouging... at everyone's expense.
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
27 Oct 11
I struggled to pay mine and not only made monthly payments, but also had my tax refund off-set for a number of years just to get it paid. If their loans get forgiven, then I demand I get all the money I had to pay for my student loan returned to me. It's only fair! Seriously, where does it stop with these idiots?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
27 Oct 11
Yup, it screws the responsible.
• United States
26 Oct 11
What they're victims of, is their decision to ask for a loan, debt is bad, and it's worse when you're trying to pay it off and you don't have a job.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
27 Oct 11
Exactly, they are only victims of themselves.
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
27 Oct 11
I think these people where victims but not of the people who gave them the loans to go to school. They where victims of what happened when you have a Federal Reserve bank that has no check and balance and can play God with a Nations Currency. They are a victim of the Housing Bubble Collapse. They where as much victims as the people who got into the subprime loans. The things is nothing can be done to make the situation better. Also I would like to state for the record that some are stating things of this nature but many and I mean over 60 to 70% of the people at the Local Occupy aren't talking of this they realize what they where victims of and are going after what caused this whole thing which is the Federal Reserve, A Government that is Corporate Owned and Approved, Financial Institutions. I would say that 20% of these people are saying things of this nature. I have also noticed that many of these are from OWS and not from the numerous other Occupies around the country. These people are angry and have many different things that anger them.