what would you rather have?a complete but dysfunctional or "incomplete" family?
By aimhrea
@aimhrea (181)
Philippines
November 17, 2011 12:17pm CST
hello, this is a question that has been brewing in my mind on and off for quite some time
a little contextualization first:
from where i come from, a family isn't "complete" unless you have both parents and the child/children; so an "incomplete" family is usually that which lacks one parent (bit too traditional and conservative i know). divorce is non existent, getting separated from one's partner is frowned upon, and getting your marriage annulled is costly and uber time consuming
coming from a dysfunctional family myself, i've always wondered if i (as the child of the family) would be better off without the parent that causes the dysfunction, i mean, would it have been better if i grew up without that parent. but then, friends who grew up without (due to abandonment, death, etc) a mother and/or father would say, be thankful you at least got to know/be with yours...
so mylotters, what do you think? which would you prefer? what situation do you think is better for a child?
1 person likes this
10 responses
@userbacsi (57)
• Hungary
17 Nov 11
It is clear that the latter. Everyone is missing those (positive) situations which they have not experienced in their lifetime. Hence told your friends the opposite. A dysfunctional family can ruin a child's life. Especially at a young age when you change your mind so much. Of course, the best if both parents are there, but the point is that the amount of time what he/she can spend with the child/children. A single parent usually working a lot and the child is often alone.
1 person likes this
@Galena (9110)
•
17 Nov 11
I had my mother, and she worked, but it didn't take away from our relationship. okay, she couldn't come to all of our school assemblies like some of the other parents, but she gave me a good work ethic. she worked hard to support me. she also put me first in everything, was always there for me when I needed her, and I never once felt like she wouldn't support me in everything I could do.
some people have both parents under the same roof, and don't have that level of support and commitment from two parents that I got from one.
this isn't to say I had one parent. it's a mistake to say that you only have one parent if they separate. you have two. and both of those parents CAN have a great deal of value in your life. however my dad wasn't a nice man. he was in my life until I was old enough to decide I just didn't want to see him anymore. he was narrow minded, bigoted and full of hate and spite. and when I decided I wanted nothing more to do with him, my mum didn't make me keep contact. contact was always on my own terms. it was my own choice that took him out of my life, not my mums choice to separate from him.
I got more from my single working mum (a single, working, Mum, and a Pagan single working Mum at that. how much would the media that demonises mothers for doing the best for their children alone consider that a recipe for disaster?) and I grew up with morals, dignity, work ethic, a value for the worth of money, not settling for a bad relationship because I know I'm worth more, loyalty, compassion and manners. than some people get from two parents living together.
I'd have been much worse off in life if they'd stayed together, as some do, "for the children"
you know, sometimes the best thing you can do for a childs emotional well being is separate when a relationship turns bad. staying together won't make them feel more stable and secure if there are arguments, sniping comments. or worse, violence. that is not a stable family. two separated parents is a far more stable family than two parents stuck together because they think it's for the best, but with no love.
1 person likes this
@snobunny17002 (2)
• United States
17 Nov 11
I think it would be better to have one parent and a functional environment, rather than two parents and a disfuntional environment.
@megamatt (14292)
• United States
20 Nov 11
The machine might run a bit clunky when incomplete, but when one or more parts that you put there is not functioning well, it can run even worse. There are just a lot of times where sometimes, one parent has it together, while one isn't able to be able to pull a head out of a certain part of their body, if you catch my drift. It is just one of those things where sometimes its better to work with a machine that doesn't have all the parts, then to keep the parts together.
Of course there are some people I knew in my childhood days where both parents are messed up and they'd be better off fending for themselves on the street. That is really a sad story but an unfortunate enough reality that many people are going to have to face sooner, rather later. Incomplete is better. Of course, some people will lose either way.
1 person likes this
@aimhrea (181)
• Philippines
20 Nov 11
i dearly love your metaphor.
and yes in situations that the only resolution to a problem is separation of the couple, even if it does ultimately lead to better circumstances, it does not discount the fact that something is lost in the process. but i guess, this is where making the best out of things come in.
@ravisivan (14079)
• India
18 Nov 11
I will look at this from this angle --1) is it better to have both parents where they take care having great concern or2) is it better to have both parents where they do not show concern because of infighting they have or3) is it better to have single parent who takes care fully well or4) is it better to have single parent who doesn't understgand his/her responsibility and neglects the child.
I prefer situation no.1. In the absence of that situation no.3.
1 person likes this
@aimhrea (181)
• Philippines
18 Nov 11
good choices. lol, not that i have the authority to give the final say on such choices :P but i guess the vital thread/theme in this is, for the children to have at least one parent--even a parental figure--who can freely and willingly dole out love, concern, and care to the child/children :)
1 person likes this
@Aja103654 (5646)
• Philippines
18 Nov 11
I'm not really sure.
In theory, a child would need both mother and father figures in his life. I don't know what it's like to not have parents, so I can't quite explain how different it will be. Only that it would be just different.
It's better for the child to have parents, even if they are not his biological parents.
1 person likes this
@aimhrea (181)
• Philippines
18 Nov 11
you bring to light a point that i think most of us wanted to state: that being a "parent" is not a matter of just giving birth to the kid or sharing their DNA, a "parent" could be someone totally unrelated by blood to the kid but in reality be the one who meets the needs--may it be emotional and/or otherwise--of the child
@almond24 (1248)
• Hungary
18 Nov 11
I would prefer the incomplete family if I would have to choose. I'm not a fan of separation, but sometimes there is no other solution, otherwise it can make the whole family's life miserable. Children might miss the father/mother model, and might have problems because of it later, but at least they will have better nerves... I know what it's like to grow up in a broken family.
1 person likes this
@nanayangel (7879)
• Philippines
18 Nov 11
Hi there Aim Rhea!
I would definitely choose a happy, even though, incomplete family. I don't think a dysfunctional one would do any good. I came from a broken family but it was a lot better than when we were all together and I can see my mother very lonely. It is not healthy for children to witness that. I would say that I became a stronger person when my parents got separated and I do not have any regrets since I see how happy my mother became when she was able to move on.
@eljayo (1105)
• Philippines
18 Nov 11
Hi! I think I would rather have a incomplete but functional family. Thank God I am blesses with a complete and functional family. I feel sorry for you and I know how it feels to have a family like that but I believe you will be able to cope up with it. Some children who have dysfunctional families lacks some values in life and it is really sad to know this. My boyfriend has a incomplete and dysfunctional family and among his sibling he is the only one who got the values while the others do not have. Thank God that I have a complete family to share with him. Thank God for it.:))
1 person likes this
@mmgonzales (882)
• Philippines
21 Nov 11
Actually both are not good depends on the acceptance of the children who is the recepient of the sadness and pain. But if that is the designed family for me to be strong enough to face the world and make my life successful and made my children grow to be the great person that they can be.. So why not. Actually i came from that dysfunctional family.. I grew strong.. I work too hard... I study very well and got the work i want.. Now pursuing parenting and Hopefully by Gods grace they would be the great person they want to be.. Then my purpose is complete...
@inlovewithmyself (59)
• Philippines
18 Nov 11
I am proud that I have a happy and complete family.But you are asking if what is better a complete but dysfunctional or an incomplete.For me maybe I'll rather choose the incomplete know why? there are many incomplete family who are being raised as a good citizens and they are also satisfied for what they have.
Maybe I can't stand long to be in an environment which is complete but you cannot find peace...:)
@aimhrea (181)
• Philippines
18 Nov 11
what struck me the most in your response was the word "peace". it is something one has to work for to achieve, may it be in terms of making do with what one has or rising above one's not so ideal situation, like you said, people who still manage to come out of it as good citizens :)
1 person likes this