X factor

December 14, 2011 1:16pm CST
I am not a big fan of the x factor and this saturday just gone was the final of the x factor in the UK.A girl group won it and they were not the best singers by far the other contestant Marcus was better.. To me it has become clear that the X factor is being fixed last year it was less obvious but the more of this they do the more obvious it is. I think that shows like the X factor should be done for 2 series than have a break then come back so the public do not get bored of them.
2 responses
Sniffy
@Sniffy (21)
•
18 Dec 11
I'm often puzzled by the judges decisions and vote results, I thought Marcus was a good deal better than Little Mix too. It seems that a performer will get slated by a judge because of song choice quite often too, not because the singer made a bad job of it but because the song isn't a "now" song, I thought the idea was to find talent not to judge music taste, surely the winner will be groomed by the right judge/manager after the event to produce competitive records.
Your Highness Emperor Albert Whisker
@CaptAlbertWhisker (32691)
• Calgary, Alberta
18 Dec 11
I think the public voted for little mix for the sake of having a group win this show already. since groups never won in the last 7 seasons of the show. The only group that gets far in the past is Onedirection.Marcus will still get a record deal I'm sure, A lot of runner ups had surpassed the success of winners.
Your Highness Emperor Albert Whisker
@CaptAlbertWhisker (32691)
• Calgary, Alberta
14 Dec 11
I think the every other year concept (my own idea) could be better so they can focus on making the winner famous in 2 years before finding a new star. with the once in 2 years concept, people will miss the show instead of getting sick of it, then they can show winning this program is worth it. They also need to get lessened the audition rounds,make the live votes longer... I also want 3 original songs week.