Female pretty faces in facebook, most of them are dummy?

Yes, if not the real gender at least, a nature, pet or anything that is not an opposite to the true gender as a pretty girl face for a guy profile pic except for a family pic.

I just need your opinion and no intention of a "war" hehhe.Btw I am amazed how other respondents delivered their messages.

I do hope, by the way, that you see my point, feel ashamed and change your avatar as soon as possible!

I want to correct whoever that said "And another child gets pulled into the politics of war..." Wearing a hijap or being Islamic is never political until people, muslim terrorists and non muslims make it so. Wearing a hijap is like a nun wearing a habit in a public place. You do not tell a nun to take off her habit, do you? A muslim child wearing a hijab is also like a christian child singing carols. There is nothing wrong in thrusting our beliefs on them, is there? BTW my image is even worse, I want to make lots of money. But I believe mine is a legitimate way so I see nothing wrong in it.

MomOf3Kids, I completely agree that wearing a hijab is a cultural (and incidentally religious) custom which France was entirely wrong to legislate against. A picture of a child wearing a hijab is not offensive in any way and nor does it make a political statement. The difference in this case is that the child wears a notice (in English, interestingly) which makes a political statement. It is NOT just a picture of a pretty child in a hijab. The child is being used as an instrument - as a weapon, in effect - presumably by her parents or with their permission. That is morally wrong. My second (and main) point is that Zearah is using this image - which may or may not be of her own child, though I suspect that it is not - in a similar way to the people she is complaining about. It is true that she does not claim (implicitly or otherwise) that the image is of her. Doubtless she chose it to make the point that she is Muslim and wears her hijab with pride (and I see nothing wrong with that at all and, indeed, respect and uphold it) but, as I explained above, the image was ill-chosen and, besides, is NOT hers to use! Although it is widely published, it was presumably taken by a press photographer and is therefore actually copyright to the photographer or the agency. I have no issues with your image, by the way, MomOf3Kids. You created it (therefore it is yours to use) and it simply makes a statement. It doesn't seek to attract people by falsely pretending that you are someone you are not (which is what the main topic of discussion is). In fact, it just tells us unequivocally about one of the things you do.