Please read the whole discussion, not just the title!
By 2004cqui
@2004cqui (2812)
United States
February 1, 2012 12:35pm CST
Recently I posted a discussion about the people who want to learn what I do online. The title read "Teach me how to earn money on line". The responses were mostly hilarious! They were telling me how to earn online in two to three sentences. If I could teach the people who ask me how, everyone would be doing it. If it were free and easy everyone would be doing it! So this was my standard answer for most of them;
Did you actually read my entire post? I already make a great income! It's the people who know me that ask me the question I used for just the title! In the future please take the time to actually read the discussion!
2 people like this
13 responses
@lekhya (819)
• India
2 Feb 12
To be frank...there was no connection between that "title & discussion".I think you wanted to test myloters and their relevance to your discussion.And moreover,you could start another discussion pointing out their irrelevance.It is right that the whole discussion should be read but at the same time you should not try to mislead people with your irrelevant titles.Try to maintain some relation between the two.People who just read the title,definitely need to be cautious hereafter and stop doing that to prevent being caught!HAPPY MYLOTTING!
1 person likes this

@pergammano (7682)
• Canada
2 Feb 12


@2004cqui (2812)
• United States
2 Feb 12
To be perfectly frank-then why did only two out of eight read just the title? They were also the first to answer! They are also known for going in and blindly answer as fast as possible and answer to make what? A penny!
They have no interest in the discussions they participate in, sometimes not making anything because they were off topic! These are the known facts.
1 person likes this

@PumpkinThePIE (217)
• Canada
1 Feb 12
Oh I saw your discussion but I couldn't understand what you were saying, lol, so I didn't respond. Sorry, but you didn't put many spaces between your paragraphs so I got confused trying to read it. However, I did get the gist of it. It does suck when people don't understand.
I have to say, your title was a little misleading when I first saw it. I think many people saw that and were just rushing to post.
1 person likes this
@2004cqui (2812)
• United States
1 Feb 12
I didn't have any paragraphs. There wasn't any need for them. Yes, people rush to post something to make a penny!? No one is supposed to rush to answer just a title. That is against the mylot rules. Funny thing is there are responses that make sense in the discussion. The funny thing is the first off track response made me pretty sure I'd get a couple more so I copied and pasted my response to that one in anticipation of more coming in. Sure enough. That is also against mylot rules, I think.
1 person likes this
@PumpkinThePIE (217)
• Canada
1 Feb 12
Paragraphs would've made it look easier and more pleasant to read cause without spaces separating the text, the post looks like one big wall that's uninviting to read.
1 person likes this
@yanzalong (19034)
• Indonesia
2 Feb 12
The title and first paragraph should be closely linked as from the two (title and the first paragraph) readers will know what's the writer trying to explain. Paragraph 2, 3 and so on are just explainatory. So, it's very important to set out your thought in paragraphs, I think.
@anncherry (406)
• Philippines
2 Feb 12
Ahahaha! XD It's like hearing a song and immediately assuming that the first few words into it is the title! XXDD
1 person likes this

@anncherry (406)
• Philippines
3 Feb 12
Yeah, there are people who close their doors before even trying to understand. ^^ But there are also those who just don't bother with the lyrics like we do, ehehe! 'Cause I'm a person who's always particular with the lyrics. I even get attracted to a song by the lyrics alone (if they are really beautiful). :))
@Mayuko (1268)
• United States
2 Feb 12
I always read the additional text that the creator of the discussion writes, not just the title. Actually I think the title of that discussion is a little misleading. I would have omitted the "teach me" part. It makes it sound as though you are the one saying that. Or I would have actually used the quotes in the title to make it sound like someone else who said it to me 

1 person likes this
@adrian_yang84 (14)
•
2 Feb 12
Hi, there.
It seems that some of them you mentioned were busy making money by replying to you in a very short time. Therefore, they wouldn't squeeze in time to read carefully what you have really written. Money is important indeed, while communication and happiness could not be ignored, either.
Wish you good luck.
1 person likes this
@uyidwi (2)
•
2 Feb 12
why not? for now we must implement what we can, should not delay the time. although it is only with a few words and with a nominal that is not so much. but with patience and dicipline must have been sometime in the future something small it will turn into a big. believe in yourself.
1 person likes this
@pergammano (7682)
• Canada
2 Feb 12




@pergammano (7682)
• Canada
2 Feb 12



@2004cqui (2812)
• United States
2 Feb 12
Nope! I didn't mis-understand you! I was agreeing with you! This whole discussion is worth printing out! I have learned a lot in the end! I think the whole thing is ridiculously funny now! (looking forward to reading your posts and comments in the future). I hope you have a great time going forward! Have a great day!
1 person likes this
@2004cqui (2812)
• United States
2 Feb 12
To me the penny I make from commenting is no where worth the experience I've had here in the last two years! There's stuff I'll talk about in here I wouldn't talk about to any friend, family, coworker or neighbor! It's hard to gossip in here!
1 person likes this

@pergammano (7682)
• Canada
2 Feb 12



@cotruelove (1016)
• Denver, Colorado
2 Feb 12


1 person likes this
@inedible (768)
• Singapore
2 Feb 12
But reading takes time! Time that could be better spent making useless uninformative replies! Everyone loves useless posts!
Seriously though, was it like, very very very clear from the main body of your post that you didn't want any advice from responders? Maybe some posters did try to read it but just failed at comprehending your post. I'm not saying I think that's what happened (since I do quite believe that most people are too lazy to read). I'm just saying it's a possibility that should be considered, since not everyone here is to speaking of English perfectingly.
@2004cqui (2812)
• United States
2 Feb 12
Yes it was very very very clear in the main body that I was venting! But it was also a serious discussion start to find out if I'm the only one dealing with people who think making money online is easy and cheap. There were only a couple of comments that reflected they didn't know what I was talking about!
@Bluedoll (16770)
• Canada
1 Feb 12
Didn't enter that discussion, as I took earn extra money off my interest list for a while. I can always put it back on but for now I am interested in discussions without agenda. It is a good idea though to read the discussions before commenting and everyone can do that one. Best wishes in the future for quality discussions but if we have a few funny ones I guess that is not too harmful.
1 person likes this
