Sachin'e hundred of hundreds

ya...i guess you are right buddy....it's been happening for quite a while now...can't be a co-incidence all the time.

Surely sachin was playing for his 100 yesterday, but virat on the other end should have played more attacking cricket, why don't he do so? why to blame only Sachin for this? And 290 was not a poor total. Pakistan managed to win with slightly less target in the same tournament against the same team. Because they had some good bowlers. Surely India is not having good bowling attack, that is the main reason for failure. And we can only say that, considering our poor bowling, Sachin and Virat should have batted more aggressively and the pitch was supporting very much for batting.

No that wasn't a pitch supporting the batsmen as Sachin himself confessed that the bounce was low and ball was coming slow which made it difficult for both of them to bat upon. Thats why they couldn't get along with the attacking strategy. But the conditions became favorable for batsmen later. You see, nobody scored more than 60 in the Bangladeshi side but still they manage to be victorious because every one who came to the crease contributed equally. But this can't be said with our team. As I said Virat played his part, so did Raina and Dhoni. At least they weren't wasting those crucial deliveries. The problem was that they couldn't gather as much strike as they needed. They rotated the strike on a continuous basis as it was Sachin who was taking the risks and not Virat. It would have been a different game if Gambhir would have been out there with Virat. Imagine Raina coming in early in place of Sachin. That could have taken the game to another level; maybe cross 300.