Is strategic break is a good idea for cricket?
@ROCKHARISH3844 (395)
India
April 10, 2012 10:54am CST
There is two break of two and a half minute each for both teams in one innings in IPL.It is called strategic time out. It was actually introduced to fill in more ads during this time and to get more money in every match. But some times it seems that the teams get advantage of the strategic time out as they came back in the match after that. It gives a chance for the coach and the captain to interact with the players and to put some changes in the game plan. But some times it will affect negatively as if a batsmen batting nicely, after the break he will loose his flow and some times get out.There is no doubt that it is boring for the viewers. What do you think? it is good for cricket? whether strategic time out should be removed?
1 person likes this
2 responses
@honest_efforts100 (1607)
• India
20 Jul 12
I am not a fun of cricket but a break in any game works either negatively or positively on a team. The coach will have time to correct some of the mistakes the players are making and at the same time give out the weakness the he has seen on the opponent team.
@pappu1990 (25)
• India
11 Apr 12
I think strategic break is not a good idea as it creates more waiting for the game and make viewers will get bored.
