Should The Dad Pay Child Support If His Ex Remarries?
@moonlitmagikchild (22181)
United States
April 30, 2012 7:39pm CST
i was thinking. i know a few people that marry for the second time bringing along their kids from the first marriage and they do not want them to be adopted by the new husband because they want the child support money.
i can see not wanting to adopt them because your paranoid it wont last but just so you can claim money? obviously he is partially a father figure or a male figure in their family and making money to where he can take care of everyone as if they were his kids.
my question is: should the Father of the kids from marriage 1 still have to pay child support if his ex wife remarries? i think if you marry the person you marry their kids also. it doesnt let the other birth parent off the hook but i dont see why they would need the child support AS MUCH as if the mother was single.
but i dont come from a broken home and my husband had his stepdad adopt him so maybe i dont understand it.
2 people like this
14 responses
@laydee (12798)
• Philippines
2 May 12
Totally. I think it's selfish for the parents to think that their obligations to the fruits of their seeds should also be extinguished once they sign the divorce papers. Remember, it's the parents that's divorcing, not the parents and the child.
I would totally let my parents pay for my well-being if they do decide to be selfish enough to divorce because they're not thinking about me when they do. They're just thinking that they want out - regardless of how it will affect me.
Have a great MyLot experience ahead!
@happythoughts (4109)
• United States
1 May 12
The divorce isnt between the parents and the kids. The money for child support is so that both parents are supporting those kids. It still costs money to put a roof over the head of the children even if it is someone elses roof. That money is for food, shelter, clothes and things to keep the kids life runing smooth. Getting remarried doesnt make the father not a father anymore. He should pay until the kids are on their own.
2 people like this
@laydee (12798)
• Philippines
1 May 12
I could remember a particular rule in the military for this discussion. A friend of mine lost her husband during the war in our country and she was pregnant then. When she gave birth, the kid has an allotment from the Military till he's 21 years old, but the allotment would be revoked if she got married. She hasn't married since and is just with a new man as a live-in partner, they have 2 more kids. When asked why she isn't married with this guy yet, she says she's waiting for the allotment to end.
I don't know if her reasons were valid, same goes with you discussion why women didn't want the new husband to adopt the kids. But I guess it's for practical reasons.
It's not about being greedy or something. It's not a way for revenge either. I think it's more of like, let's say you are given something free every month, would you let it go? Let's take for example my friend's allotment is around $150.00, that's $150.00 more of what she and her partner earns. It's not a lot but it's something extra. Why would you let go of the 'extra' which you could well use for enjoyment of your kids or something?
I think the Dad should pay child support even if the ex remarries. Even if the ex already marries, that kid is still the dad's kid, right? Further, if they separate with the new husband, should the new guy pay for his kids and those of his ex wife's kids the first marriage? That is unfair.
Have a great MyLot experience ahead!
1 person likes this
@moonlitmagikchild (22181)
• United States
1 May 12
some people are getting like $600 for a kid.
you brought up a good point on what if she split from the new guy. that would have made a huge mess!
1 person likes this
@TheIzers (680)
•
1 May 12
The amount of the money itself really depends on where they live because every state has different law for that. If I don't mistaken California is the most expensive one. However other than where they live the judge can apply the father/mother income. Just like some of my friends they get child support around $300 for her kids but if they make million of $$ then the judge can reconsider it and order them to pay more than that.
1 person likes this
@laydee (12798)
• Philippines
2 May 12
Well, I guess there's your answer then. They need the fathers to pay up because once those dad becomes rich, the kids should benefit of it too divorced parents or not.
Further, do these kids from divorces also take anything from the parents when these parents die? I mean, if the father owns a huge company, could the son or the daughter get part of it even if the parents got divorced?
@ShyBear88 (59347)
• Sterling, Virginia
1 May 12
I think that is the child's choice if they want to be adopted or not by there step parent. Just because one of the parents remarry it doesn't mean that the other parents right to there child is terminated weather they have the same last name or not they have legal rights to that child and the other parent has legal rights to ask for support for that child from that child's other parent. It has nothing to do with there child being adopted by there partner or not.
My husbands and his sister were told it was there choice if they wanted to be adopted or not by there step dad. They didn't want to be because he is not there father. Of course my husband's father never wanted anything to with my husband and his sister after he got divorced from my husbands mother. Now both of my husbands parents are remarried. Either them adopted any of there step kids as there own. They treat them as there own but they didn't put them under them. Once married it doesn't mean your other half that created your kids just get out of paying for there child. Child support is meant for the child not the other parent its used for the child till they are 18 years old to pay for schooling stuff, clothes, food for the child. Just because they got married doesn't mean they can all of a sudden support there child and there needs. By law till that child is 18 regardless of the parents remarrying the other half that doesn't have the kids has to pay the parent that has full custody of the child. As long as they filled for support that support should be given.
1 person likes this
@ShyBear88 (59347)
• Sterling, Virginia
3 May 12
here in the US once 18 your an adult so no parent can calm you unless its on there taxes.
@Suebee (2013)
• Canada
1 May 12
Once a parent, always a parent. Why shouldn't the parent, be it father OR mother continue to pay child support? And yes, I know some mothers who are paying child support. The child is theirs. It doesn't matter if the ex-spouse marries a millionaire and doesn't even need the money, although in that extreme case they may decided that they don't need it anymore and let their ex off the hook. In any case, it's not about the money or the amount of money or whether of not the ex-spouse remarries, it's about caring for your children.
1 person likes this
@zeus01 (29)
• Philippines
1 May 12
mandatory or not,ramarried or not. As a good father its your responsibility to help your kid,financially and not.
we dont need to complicate things that much, if youre not mandated by a certain law on amount,give what ever you can,money time,etc.
1 person likes this
@sedel1027 (17846)
• Cupertino, California
2 May 12
It's a hard judgement call. We get support from my ex for my son, almost all of it goes into a savings account for him for college. We do use some of it to cover other expenses for him - like this month he needed new equipment for sparring class. If my ex didn't pay support he would find a way to weasel out of the other things he is supposed to cover. We use the support money when he refuses to pay for those other items. Yes, my husband married me and my son, and he can afford to support everyone, but why should his Dad not help out? Even when we lived 5 minutes away his Dad hated paying for his share of anything, back out on outings they were supposed to attend together, and often canceled visitation visits. Even now if we wouldn't pay for half of the trip for him to see his Dad, he would never get to see him.
@maximax8 (31046)
• United Kingdom
2 May 12
I believe that once a dad always a dad and that man should still support his child or children financially. It is great when a divorced lady with kids finds a new husband bu the previous husband should still support his kids. I think it is fantastic if the step parent pays money for the child or children too.
My parents spit up when I was 10 to 11 years old. My mom was short of money in my teenage years. She had a mortgage to pay for each month. She wishes my dad had given her money to support me and my sister. I dated a man and his ex-wife had his son. He paid child support even though his ex-wife had remarried. He saw his son every weekend.
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
11 Feb 13
My opinion is that the biological parent should be financially, emotionally, and physically responsible for their children for life. Whether the other parent remarries or not, if you created the child you are responsible.
Yes I understand that the step-parent marries the children as well as the spouse, and should support and raise them with love.. but I don't see why that should let the biological parent off the hook.
@kprofgames (3091)
• United States
8 Mar 13
Adoption can only take place if the father of the child(ren) gives up his parental rights. That or they pass away; however it is still up to the child(ren) if they want their step parent to adopt them legally.
As far as child support, yes they should have to continue to support the child(ren) they created. As with most people who separate or divorce their is visitation with the non custodial parent but just because they don't live with them doesn't mean they don't have to support them.
Even if the ex spouse remarries, those funds still are for the living expenses, college fund, etc of their children.
@aerous (13434)
• Philippines
23 Oct 12
I think support to kids must not be stop because this is a parents responsibility. Even if the ex or the other marries someone else. Father still have the responsibility to support or give some support to his kids.
We don't talk her about someone side but in the eyes of the law and for moral responsibility. Parents, must always be responsible for his children. If he wants to get the opinion of the lawyer to stop child support. Because of the breach of contract that the other party being committed. But in my opinion the court didn't want to give a waver to stop child support from parents. Because support from parents is very important for children to raise them well and became responsible citizens someday!
@marguicha (222868)
• Chile
16 Jun 12
I think that the biological mother and father of a child should support him according to their means whether or not one of them marry again. This does not have to do with whether they are single or not, but whether they are parents or not.
@randylovesdar (4932)
• United States
1 May 12
A father should always pay child support for his child or children. I feel that if a spouse gets remarried than the ex should not ask for alamony, but the kids will always be his and therefore a father should always pay child support. If the father is afraid that that mother will use the money on herself than he could offer to pay for things the kids need such as food, clothing and school supplies.
@krupar5 (287)
• United States
1 May 12
I think that the father of prior marriages should still pay support for his children, regardless if the new spouse can provide for the children. I am remarried and my husband has taken my 3 children as his own. We have 2 children of our own and college and basic necessities are expensive. He married me knowing the circumstances, but as he said the child support helps. The money we recieve goes into an account for college for his step children, and by doing that we have money to put in for the 2 we have together. It isn't about taking money and being greedy, it is about helping your children with better things.
1 person likes this