K to 12 Education
@wildflow3rz28 (180)
Philippines
June 4, 2012 5:57am CST
In the Philippines a new law was passed mandating the K to 12 basic education program. High school level would be extended from 4 years to 6 years. Citing The Official Gazette (edited at the office of the President of the Philippines):
"The K to 12 program covers kindergarten and 12 years of basic education (6 years primary education, 4 years junior HS, and 2 years senior HS."
It was said that its purpose is to "provide sufficient time for mastery of concepts and skills, develop lifelong learners, and prepare graduates for tertiary education, middle level skills development, employment, and entrepreneurship".
A common Filipino family finds it difficult to send children to school in the shorter basic education that we used to have, how much more could it get now that their suffering would be prolonged. Would it prove to be beneficial in the long run?
Share your opinions guys! :))
3 people like this
5 responses
@bLadeee (403)
• Philippines
5 Jun 12
To be honest it is a really good idea, but for me, i don't really like it here at Philippines for a plenty of reason. First, more and more family experienced poverty with this situation some parents but sometimes the child chose to work at a very young age to help their family since it'll take 12 years just to finish primary and secondary education. Second, by making a child study when he/she is 5 years old until 16, 17, or whatsoever year, it'll someday go to the point where the student will lost his/her interest in studying. Lastly, everything that'll be taught in school wouldn't be fully applied to your work/college but it's up to the student on how he/she will utilize the thing/s that he/she learned even it's only a few knowledge (let's say that he/she is not really performing well), so basically extending the studying here in the Philippines maybe a waste of time. It's just my opinion.
@wildflow3rz28 (180)
• Philippines
5 Jun 12
I'm actually a bit worried because my kid is an incoming preschool. Child's first day in school, first trial of the new education system, possible additional schooling expenses... so much to be scared of for a newbie parent like me.
But if this is going to make her a better person someday, why not? :)
@wildflow3rz28 (180)
• Philippines
5 Jun 12
Now I'm smiling because I remember when I was in the 5th grade I think, there were times when I felt too lazy to attend my classes. Sometimes I'd told my mom that I was not feeling well so I can stay at home... hehehe!
@bLadeee (403)
• Philippines
5 Jun 12
Of course, just like what i tell on my previous post it is actually a good idea it's just that it more depends upon the child/student to do his/her best since before the implementation of K+12 almost every year more and more of my highschool classmates lost interest in studying, what if now that there's an additional 2 years. If a child/student is on the right track of studying, i'am sure that after 12 years, he'll be more prepared to enter college compared before.
@laydee (12798)
• Philippines
4 Jun 12
I think there's a lot of confusion because there isn't a lot of information about the matter. But if you were able to attend talks about the stuff, you'd see that it's actually better.
Firstly, it's better because kids don't start at 4 years old, they start at 5years old where they're already old enough to go to school, so there are no more crying. hahahaha..
Secondly, Kinder.. (K) is the only preschool then grades 1-10 (10years) will be the basic schooling. Here the things that are going to be discussed will be the basic things that we need to know.
After the Grade 10, everyone will have to take the exam given by CHED and it will determine what the student will get in the next 2 years. If the aptitude states that you are not fit or don't like then you'd go to the basic work or vocational courses, for the next 2 years you'd be taught those things. Afterwhich, you can directly look for a job and start earning.
On the other hand, there will be listed points for the courses that you'd like to apply in, if you get into those, the next two years will be in 'preparation' for the course. Which is good because you'd be focused on the profession that you want.
Why is it good? Well, you'd be aligning your education to the rest of the world, therefore, you will no longer be required to study 2 more years (which most of our graduates do when they transfer or go outside the country).
Another reason why it's good is that parents could no longer choose courses for their kids! hahahah.. and kids can no longer take courses that are not fit to their capacity. Which means, it will be alot cheaper for the parents and government could easily control the number of graduates for each field instead of having a lot without the possibility of getting jobs.
I think it is indeed good. Though, there would be a lot of adjustments for everyone.
So don't fear changes, you don't need to embrace it, but just give it a chance and hope for the best!
Have a great MyLot experience ahead!
@wildflow3rz28 (180)
• Philippines
5 Jun 12
Hi,
I am actually not against it, nor am I campaigning for it as we really have no choice but to accept it.
The only problem is that due to these students who will be extending high school tenure, the problem with lack of classrooms and other basic requirements would get even bigger. This is a very good policy if well prepared for. I just hope we could pass through every hurdle to pursue this.
@laydee (12798)
• Philippines
5 Jun 12
I think the plan is great, but we'll see about the execution. There will be rough patches to deal with at first, but like a railroad, once it's perfected, it will be smooth and everyone goes through with it will reap the benefits!
Thanks for the comment!
@wildflow3rz28 (180)
• Philippines
5 Jun 12
If the graduates of this new system would be more equipped and productive then expensive college would not be someone's worst nightmare :))
@airkulet (2700)
• Philippines
4 Jun 12
I think this will be difficult for the family whose earning are below the average, which usually after their children finished fourth year high school go out and find an average job, on which some employer hire only a minimum of high school graduates.
I hoped that the standard of hiring employees will accept also undergrad if they cannot be able to finish at least high school
@wildflow3rz28 (180)
• Philippines
5 Jun 12
That's a great step, I would be glad (and so most people, i think) if they will take that into consideration, too. I've seen some establishments that accept only college level applicants as food servers or baristas.
@yzakia (65)
• Philippines
4 Jun 12
I don't think it's beneficial. It's just a waste of time and money! the teachers are just trained less than 1 month for that new curriculum. How can the government assure us the quality of education in letting our kids add 2 more years in their studies? I don't think it will solve the issue. This is the time that the poor will become more poorer if they can't afford to send their children to school. I'm very sure the rate of out-of-school youth will increase.
@wildflow3rz28 (180)
• Philippines
5 Jun 12
Hi,
Yes, that should be a primary concern. I'm sure many parents would get threatened just by the mere thought of sending their child to school. Some of them might even project future expenses in their minds and just dismiss the idea of educating their children.
The vision and objectives are really good, though. They would be met if proper training and resources allocation are done.