Science and Religion.
By baronarthur
@baronarthur (4187)
Indonesia
8 responses
@baronarthur (4187)
• Indonesia
26 Nov 06
That's good.
Thanks for the opinion.
I really appreciate it.
@queenstan (383)
• Indonesia
22 Nov 06
It depends on what is science and religion mean.
If religion is supranatural, than it must be surpasses the science.
1 person likes this
@baronarthur (4187)
• Indonesia
22 Nov 06
So just define it.
Thanks for the opinion.
I really appreciate it.
@hikaruch4n (339)
• Australia
21 Nov 06
I'm kinda agree with that, we cannot live with only religion (well, we need to improve right?) or science only (it'll feel very empty)
@baronarthur (4187)
• Indonesia
22 Nov 06
You got the point.
Thanks for the opinion.
I really appreciate it.
@baronarthur (4187)
• Indonesia
21 Nov 06
That's good. I think that the source of science is God.
Thanks for the opinion.
I really appreciate it.
@sekhmetgb (462)
•
21 Nov 06
You have done it again baron. This is not the first time you attract my attention when scrolling through the non-response list. I love that quote - and I think it is probably true. I would probably replace in the first part of the quote, religion by morality - because I do not think you have to be religious to have morality, but I know what Einstein meant to say and I think he was very enlightened generally. I really like your posts, they always make me think :)
@baronarthur (4187)
• Indonesia
21 Nov 06
Thanks for the compliment.
I'm trying hard to think about a quality discussion.
It usually have no response, but it's OK.
But sometimes some wise people like you read it and make a quality response. I really appreciate it.
@baronarthur (4187)
• Indonesia
22 Nov 06
Ha..ha..
You should try it..
Thanks for the opinion.
I really appreciate it.
@baronarthur (4187)
• Indonesia
21 Nov 06
Ha..ha..And what is the good thing?
Thanks for the response.
I really appreciate it.