James Holmes Is Not Lone Militia

United States
July 24, 2012 5:58pm CST
Few days ago, 24-year-old graduate student, James Holmes, shot and killed 12 people and over 50 wounded in a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. With all the speculations on this tragedy, I am of the opinion that James Holmes is not a lone militia: James Holmes bobby-trapped his apartment, acquired 4 guns and about 6,000 rounds of ammunitions, went in and out of theater with weapons via emergency exit without setting alarm; and after shooting rampage, calmly sat and waited to be arrested by law officers (as if assured he would not be shot dead, as may have been the case). Just too many oddities for my comfort. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/us/shooting-at-colorado-theater-showing-batman-movie.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all While it is very possible for anyone without a criminal background to obtain 4 guns, I find it hard to believe that someone acquired 6,000 rounds of ammunitions without setting an alarm or raising suspicion (when my mails are scanned daily by government goons and I cannot enter a courthouse in Texas without being asked to take off my shoes or remove my belt! Of course, I am also aware that James Holmes may have been under the influence of nanodevices. Notice how they drugged James Holmes really good for his first court appearance? I wonder what they were afraid he might say in the courtroom. (Sigh)
1 person likes this
1 response
debrakcarey
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
25 Jul 12
ABC news as the story broke was practically giggling when they announced that there were possibly Tea Party connections to the shooter. Turns out that if they'd look a bit more to the LEFT, they'd have found THIS http://patdollard.com/2012/07/report-batman-shooter-is-black-bloc-occupier/ http://www.examiner.com/article/more-signs-point-to-james-e-holmes-having-been-occupy-black-bloc-member OWS claimed him as one of their own. Not JUST OWS, but their most violent sector, the blac bloc. Blac bloc members are dressed in black with their faces covered. Blac bloc definition: http://mlcastle.net/raisethefist/bloc.html
Netsbridge
@Netsbridge (3253)
• United States
26 Jul 12
Whether affiliated with conservatives or liberals, fact from my perspective remains that James Holmes is connected with some group. And the fact that most conservative blogs would not even mention James Holmes by name or engage in discussions about the Aurora theater shooting several hours after incident (and yet are still very active on George Zimmerman) makes me wonder.
debrakcarey
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
26 Jul 12
You think it is a bad thing that conservative blogs did not start pointing fingers of blame until they had some facts to go on??? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you. The Zimmerman case went down pretty much the same, the MSM/liberal media started pointing fingers and misrepresenting the facts immediately, the conservative bloggers went looking for the truth before they commented. And since the truth has been out there for awhile, and the case is still open, why should they NOT continue to comment?? I too feel he is associated with some group, and the OWS claimed him and even the MSM is saying he had ties to them because it's pretty hard to lie about when there's a screen shot of an OWS site claiming him, and his actions before the shooting show he was involved with them. What's your point?
Netsbridge
@Netsbridge (3253)
• United States
26 Jul 12
Not a matter of pointing fingers, Debrakcarey. When I say several hours, I actually meant as in 100 hours. By Tuesday, July 24, we knew a whole lot about James Holmes and the Aurora theater shooting. Prior discussions on most of these conservative blogs were ignored. Those that mentioned the Aurora theater shooting did not mention the names James Holmes. They instead discussed and defended nutcase George Zimmerman (whom any logical person knew months ago was a simpleton and a loony), and literally justified fund-raising on conservative forums on his behalf. Now, what do you make of that?