obama’s kenyan birth records discovered in british national archives

I sort of agree wilt that. I did watch a Youtube video and it said it was to allow people llid Rubio to run later as president, but I think the whole rule of having a natural born citizen to only be qualified and those whose parents became Amerilcan citizens even though they were born out of the country was to prevent what happened from happening. No one would mind if the law was changed to allow someone like Rubio to run for president in the off chance that the president passed if Obama was defeated, because we all know where his loyalties lie. But the original founding fathers were afraid someone whose loyalties were elsewhere - like to the way y Europe is governed, to become president and that is what has happened.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/forgerygate-what-will-it-take-for-congress-to-wake-up/ Interesting point of view.

I think this was planned from the get go. The Luba wanted him and didn't bother to verify his birth records. Maybe they didn't want to know.

I beg to differ with the 'witch hunt' statement. Over half of the American public think there is something fishy about all this. And some of them are professional people with a lot to loose for their troubles. What I find extremely funny crossbones, is that YOU know so very little about this and yet feel you are qualified in calling me out on it. As you can tell from the entirety of this discussion, I am willing to take the advice of friends like Mike, Michael, and the others when they approach me with respect. I find it pretty difficult to accept your advice when you accuse me of being on a 'witch hunt' and btw...these 'buddies' are by NO MEANS far right, in fact far far from it. Yet, they can speak to me with respect and I can accept their opinions with the same. I'd suggest, until YOU spend three years looking at ALL the facts, not just what the MSM barely covers, but ALL of it, until you do that, please refrain from implying that I am some sort of bigoted idiot. My concern is the Constitution and preserving the dignity of the office of President of MY COUNTRY. (as much as it is yours)

Deb- All I am going to say is we cannot preserve the dignity of the constitution if people continue to make stuff up. These types of things are actually hurting that cause. Maybe you should take a step back and look at this theory of yours from a new light. Sometimes when we get so involved in something we start seeing what we want to see.

That a good point too, to have a secondary source. I even forget to do that sometimes when I am trying to make a point.

And THAT - "Everyone is entitled to their opinion," - is an opinion we both share! Annie

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Mine and yours differ.

My "so what?" point was pointing that the people find the problem and the governement is supposed to fix their mistake and the government won't. THey never do. Look at the fiasco with Clinton? All they did was bat it around till he was out anyway..so what if he did something wrong? He didn't have to pay for his crime. IN this case...there you said it yourself...it has been proved forged. So what? Is anyone in government going to do anything about it? Of course not. They have got away with it for 4 years, they think they can get away with it for 4 more. In cases like this...what they should do is put it out to the people of this country and say...."here's the issue...please vote and tell us what you want." Then have a national vote on "Impeach Obama" or "let Obama remain"...and let us people decide. THose up there on the hill...they'd be out of a job if that is the way it worked so of course they aren't going to do that either! Ergo my..."so what?". The only time the people of this country are allowed to say anything or try to make something happen is at voting time. Come November..VOTE. And don't say... "I don't want Obama but I don't want Romney either so I'm not going to vote". A no vote for Romney means a vote for Obama. And a vote for Obama means another 4 years of what we have just come through. So think about it and go vote!!!

Congress made eight different attempts to alter our U.S. Constitution concerning the Natural Born Citizenship Clause according to the apocalyptic video documentary done with research by Senior Pastor Carl Gallups proving they knew Barack Obama lacked presidential eligibility prior to the 2008 election! If there was no problem for Obama why would these people do this? There had never been a question of Natural Born Citizenship in our lifetimes! Why fix what wasn’t broken? The youtube video goes on to reveal a secret, closed door meeting was held with eight Supreme Court Justices just prior to the January 2009 Inauguration that sent our other courts an unspoken message to don’t go there. Plaintiff attorneys with cases were pending at the time were not allowed into this meeting! Only Justice Samuel Allito declined to attend this secret meeting. EXPERTS say with 100% certainty that the long form birth certificate is FORGED. Yea, it seems like all three of our branches of government have said...so what. And here we sit at our computers keyboarding all about it. So what. Just don't know how any of us can sleep at night knowing all we can muster to the fall of our Republic, is...so what.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/forgerygate-what-will-it-take-for-congress-to-wake-up/ Interesting article.

I have been reading in other comments you have for this discussion, and found that of a british man, that gave you a link of the GB national archives, I will try to look for it myself, because I find this very interesting, even exhiting, is like being immerse in the watergate case, first hand.

I tried and couldn't make it work. Hope you have better luck. I've sent this link to those who are investigating this in the US, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Trump, and others. We'll see if they run with it and have better luck. Thanks for your interest albto.

My thinking is that this particular source saying that his records exist in the British archives for colonial Kenya's records may be the only site saying so. THAT makes verifying it more difficult, but does NOT necessarily mean their info is untrue.

@topffer, IT WAS available until after this though? The law changed and it was no longer avialable to public? I am not so sure the MSM in the US is all that interested in finding out if their darling is a crook and a sham or not. lol It is so obvious that the media is biased to the left here that even the left jokes about it. Could I, an American citizen make that request for records in the UK? I'm not so good at reading law, I will copy the link to my nephew who is a lawyer. See what he says. Thanks guys. And a special hug for not blasting me with insults for the request.

You guys are awesome for helping me out here. I tried with the link Mike gave to the records search- to enter his name, came back 'no records found'. Don't know what I may be doing differently. I do believe the records are there. When we first were shown the Certified Live Birth form online in 2009, Hawaiian officials said the Long Form did not exist, BUT here we now have one (that experts say is 100% forged). I find it interesting that in his book Obama says he found his birth certificate in his grandmother's attic, but for over a year we were told that there was NO WAY to get the long form from Hawaii, (that was why we had to 'settle' for the short form, that it did not exist (There is a young man who worked for state of HA who signed an affidavit affirming he was told that by HA officials too)THEN after Trump started his campaign to get Obama to release the long form suddenly HA has a long form birth certificate available? To many inconsistencies for me to say OH WELL... So, I've sent the link to guess who? Trump via twitter, Romney vis twitter, and of course the guys over at WND who can investigate it as well.

In reading some on this last night I was reminded that a Kenyan birth certificate was offered up as evidence, (with again, a signed affidavit) then 'proven' to be bogus. Last night I read the testimony of the person who first claimed to have found it, and the suggestion that IT was tampered with after the fact as a way to 'discredit' it. You know, make changes on it then claim they were there all along and therefore IT IS a fake. Disinformation I believe they call it. I am not in a position to prove that this is so, but I'm not going to reject the Kenyan BC for lack of evidence either. Like you said in another discussion, the truth will come out sooner or later.

an I'm thinking that what the UK archives may have is on microfilm. It is not a document per se.

I've got some thoughts on that, similar to yours. I'll just say where there is smoke, there is fire.