Romney Out of Touch? ~ FINAL CHALLENGE TO DEMOCRATS

Poor choice of words? Both republican and democrat parties are equally guilty of doing this. The republican governor of Missouri called anyone unemployed presently or in the past "lazy, Xbox players sitting around for the phone to ring. They should take 2 or three jobs, be willing to move, do anything other than dreaming of that perfect job" There are no words for a parent who's lost a child. Anything said to them would almost always be inappropriate.

Obama doesn't have a clue what's going on in America. He never has and he doesn't care to find out because then he would have to address some of it.

Frankly, I don't give a crap whether he's "in touch" with America or not. Right now we need someone who knows finance and politics and Romney qualifies for both. I don't want to like my president, I don't care what his hobbies are or if he was poor or born with a silver spoon. I care about what he or she can do for this country and what I think of him personally has nothing to do with that performance. Why the hell should people care if their president is likeable or "in touch"?! Jimmy Carter was everything this type of person could want and look at what he did to us. I wish someone would take America by its collective shoulders and shake it out of its celebrity culture and need for touchy-feely everything. Until then we won't get the government we need on any level.

Honestly, I agree with Clinton. If the raid on Bin Laden had gone wrong, and the troops were captured or killed, then it would show that Obama had done a terrible thing, and he got those people killed or captured. It would have been horrible for everyone. It would have been horrible for the people who were behind that raid, it would have been horrible for every single person that ever knew each one of those people, it would have been horrible for all members of the military that were working on that raid, and it would have been horrible for Obama, the person who put his seal of approval on it. Clinton was talking directly about where Obama is in the direction, and I'm sure he would agree how it would have been terrible for everyone, but that wasn't what he was talking about. However, Obama did authorize that raid, and with it, the American's killed the man who was their number one enemy ever since 2001 with the attack in New York. George Bush, the republican before him, on the other hand, sent so many troops into Iraq, which only served to capture their money and oil, and had so many soldiers die in the war, and spent an insanely huge amount of money on the projects. And what did it get him? His choices lead to so many deaths, and political corruption, but you're saying that Obama did something bad, in actually going after the principal enemy of the American people? I'd like to see any of the troops who were on that mission, just a single one, say that it was crazy, or evil, or wrong, that they were sent into Bin Laden's compound. I highly doubt any of them were against it. I would expect every soldier and every person involved, to be extremely proud that they had a hand in killing the man who actually brought such terror onto every single American citizen, and so many people from around the world.

How can anyone say that Mitt is out if touch?! If anyone is it's the one in the white house now. Yes we can. YES we can! Well what has he done except make us more dependent on the government?

I watched it. I thought about it. I have decided that if every American would see things through the eyes of this father and mother... His little message to Clint Eastwood, "This seat is taken" says he really is concerned about nothing more than his agenda.