Schools taking away brown bag lunches...that is just so wrong!
By coffeebreak
@coffeebreak (17798)
United States
September 15, 2012 12:03pm CST
http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/pb-38-j-worst-weapon-kid-bring-school-215000284.html
See. I don't think teachers or schools should have this right. LIke the one person said...those with allergies should be taught how to deal/live with them...not make the whole society bow out to accommodate the issues of a few. If they are that concerned...maybe signs and teachers saying "Do Not Share Your Food" are more the way to go. But to take one kids food away, cause there is a few that can't eat what he was eating...that is just wrong. It is kind of like in reverse...if a kid is diabetic and has to take insulin...does the school make all the kids take insulin? Of course not..but this is the same thing. Take from all to satisfy the few. I have compassion for those with allergies but at the same time...don't punish everyone else.
Think about it from the kids point of view...he is allergic to nuts and can't have peanut butter, so his friend is told he can't have it either and the friend loves PBJ's and now he can't have one....that friendship might be on it's way down hill cause kids at that age don't understand much more than the fact that because I can't have this...I loose friends or the one that can have but can't..doesn't bother to make friends with those that can't. I think schools need to pay more attention to educating the kids mentally and not supervising their eating..that is the parents job.. to teach their kids what they can and can not have to eat.
However. I do understand that the school lunches need to be a bit more supervised as to not having nut things and the allergic like in the school meals, but if it is brought from home...the school has no right to condemn.
6 people like this
16 responses
@sender621 (14894)
• United States
15 Sep 12
I don't think that the schools should have the right to dictate what a child eats for lunch. only a parent should have that right. As long as a chikd is getting the nutrition they need it shoukd not matter if a the kunch cimes in a brown bag or is served on a tray.
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Sep 12
Totally agree with you both. And a PBJ..that isn't all that "unhealthy" as peanut butter has protein in it and we are always trying to get kids to eat protein..they need protein! Put it on whole wheat bread...gluten free bread...only thing not so "healthy" is the jelly, but use it appropriately and they get that little bit of sugar that they crave in the middle of the day to keep them going and they won't be craving candy!!!
And you never hear of them taking away a balogna sandwich....and that is among the most unhealthy thing you can eat!
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
16 Sep 12
Yuck, I hate bologna, I don't buy it lol! The weird thing is, it must be cheap because all my friends used to eat it as kids and the only reason I ever wanted it back then was because my mom refused to buy it, so I was the only kid with turkey or ham instead of bologna! I think peanut butter is pretty healthy, we eat it... almond butter too, and my daughter doesn't like jelly, she never has. Daddy made her a sandwich once when she was about 3 and she goes 'daddy, I don't like JELLY'. I find it kind of bizarre because she loves fruit. I wonder if I could get her to eat a peanut butter sandwich with some sliced berries or banana on it...
@Autumnrose2008 (1478)
• United States
15 Sep 12
I agree with you on this one. I used to send my kids to school with a peanut butter sandwich and sometimes we were lucky to even have that to send them to school with. I would be so mad if I could not afford to provide anything more for my kids and to have a teacher throw it away that would be a slap to the face for me. I do know that at my daughters school all the teachers are trained to use an epi pen and the kids with peanut allergies would sit at a peanut free table. One year there was a kid that could not be around peanuts at all and that kid was able to eat in the class room away from peanuts. They made accomadations with out effecting the whole school perhaps this school should take a lesson from schools that have done it this way for years.
2 people like this
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Sep 12
IN addition to the affordability...most lunch meats can't be taken without an ice pack in the bag. PBJ can be...no concern of food poisoning if PBJ gets room temp or even hot. But hot ham or turkey, chicken...its like calling food poisoning to lunch! Schools make such a big deal over a small, solvable issue. If I was one of the kids and knew that the other kids were having their lunches taken away because I had an allergy to the lunch item... I'd be SOO embarressed!
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
3 Oct 12
Yeah, back in my day.. we didn't have these little ice pak things like they have now. I had them for my kids tho and now...15 years later..they still have them and they are in cute shapes and forms etc. My GD uses pink ones! Really works well.
@cutepenguin (6431)
• Canada
15 Sep 12
Here, the policy is that no one may bring nut products from home. I don't think someone's safety is something that is to satisfy a few, these are children. Schools should be safe, and it isn't always just a matter of eating the peanut butter.
My son isn't allergic to anything, but one of his friend's is. So when we are going to see her, I don't pack anything with nuts. He doesn't mind - there are plenty of other healthy foods he can eat, and he doesn't see it as punishment. Also, I think it would be scarier and more traumatic for him to see his friend go into anaphylactic shock because he offered her a bite of his peanut butter cookie than it would be to have a cheese sandwich instead of a peanut butter one.
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Sep 12
Then instead of taking lunches..why not have signs or make the announcement at the first of every lunch .."don't share food" or "don't eat your friends lunch" or something like that. PRobelm with people today is that they dont' have to take responsibility for anything anymore...and in doing this...that is what the school it teaching kids...you don't have to take responsibility for anything you do because someone else will be punished or take blame for it". Taking from the kid that didn't have a problem to satisfy the kid that does have the problem...that is so wrong. The kid did nothing, but got punished..got his lunch taken away. How wrong is that!!!!
I think most are okay and compassionate about not sending a food with their child that their friend they are going to be with has an allergy. But in the case of the school...they have hte right to not include that food item in their lunch menu, but not the right to confiscate it if brought from home.
If the child with the allergy has problem remembering he can't eat something..then the mother should just put a nice note in his lunch every day,... remember, eat only your own lunch. Don't eat your friends lunch" and visa versa with the other kdis "Don't share your lunch with anyone." how hard is that!?!??!
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
15 Sep 12
I do abide by this if there is a policy of no nut products because we had a little boy in my mom group get ahold of a peanut butter cookie and we had to take him to the ER. His mom had an epi-pen but he was only about two and a half and the cookies were close enough to be in reach. He didn't know it was a peanut butter cookie since he'd never eaten one before, but he ate half of it before we realized what he had. It was really scary.
At this point, my daughter is in 3rd grade so they don't tell us we cannot pack peanut butter, in fact the proctors and teachers told me they don't let the kids share, and I don't think my daughter would give anybody her sandwich (she loves peanut butter) plus she will ask people if they are allergic to nuts. It becomes less of a problem I think as kids get older. I know I used to share and trade lunch items all the time when I was in school but none of my friends nor I had any allergies and we also didn't have staff hanging over us prohibiting us from sharing/trading lunches lol. If we did, I bet we would have done it MORE rather than less lol.
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
16 Sep 12
I agree with NOT punishing the innocent person, but basically making the non-innocent person be responsible, or suffer consequences. Responsibility is something that parents need to teach kids, BEFORE they are out in the world in school where it is way too easy to just try to blame others for your own shortcomings. People should also NOT allow other people to bully or blame them if it's not their fault, know what I mean?
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
16 Sep 12
Before I read the article I thought Uh-oh the Food Nazis are at it but I think they better find a compromise real soon. If they ban Peanut butter and jelly , those parents of autistic children will get a class action suit together.But I do see where there is a need to protect the kids that are allergic. They should just have separate lunchtimes one with peanuts , one without.
1 person likes this
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
17 Sep 12
I still can't feel that this is an excuse to get every child to pay for lunch. But what may happen is that kids just won't eat lunch at the school. I know I would just stop packing a lunch if I knew the school was going to take it away.
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Sep 12
Yeah, or hey.. how about teaching their children about their allergy and the do's and don'ts of it and have separate tables should that be needed! But taking a kids lunch away, even if it replaced, is not the way to go. The allergic kid had nothing said to him! And how did that teacher know that there wasnt' something in that school lunch that the kids was allergic to, yet she made him eat it!
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
17 Sep 12
But the school should NOT be taking away lunches, period! Replacing the lunch is not going to do the trick, NOT if you pack your child a lunch because your child tells you the lunches at school are gross and they won't eat them. I liked most of the lunches at school but I was in school a long time ago. It has really gone downhill, there are two days where the cafeteria here serves something my daughter likes, and I pack her something the other days because if not, she probably wouldn't eat anything - she'd have a chocolate milk. If the school thinks A CHOCOLATE MILK is enough for a lunch, then I'll just shut up now lol.
2 people like this
@shaggin (72116)
• United States
15 Sep 12
That would be a huge problem for my kids as they will not eat anything on the lunch menu except pizza. I would be scared if I had a child with a life threatening allergy as well but they need to be taught to only touch and eat what they have. I would homeschool my kids until they understood that. The school could always have a seperate table for kids with allergies.
1 person likes this
@GardenGerty (160626)
• United States
16 Sep 12
For some the allergy is so severe that to breathe air in a room that has peanuts in it can be life threatening, but there are other ways to deal with this rather than banning a nutritious food from the school. It is no wonder that many parents want to home school. My daughter would like to, but her husband does not agree. One statistic she discovered is that if you do two and a half hours of actual teaching of your home schooled children daily you are doing as much as they get in public school what with waiting in line, or shuffling between locations in the building or waiting for the teacher to be available for you.
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Sep 12
And the thing is... the kid without the allergy is being punished for the kid that has the allergy! I know that if I was a kid and knew some other kid got their lunch taken away cause of my health problem, I would be so embarressed. I don't think that so much that they should be separated at lunch tables, but maybe tell them..."these kids have things you can't eat...don't eat anything but what is in your own lunch" or something like that. IN this case...instead of taking the lunch..she should have taken both kids and said..."you have this..don't share" and to the other.."you are allergic to this..eat only your own lunch" or soemthign like that. but to take the lunch...that was totally uncalled for.
My GD doesn't buy lunch on any day but a chicken sandwich day...she says the food is pretty bad. Now, she is a picky eater, but if this kid comes home and says the macaroni and cheese is gross....you know it is gross!
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
16 Sep 12
Homeschooling - unless you do it through an accredited school online - is tough. I tried it with my older kids and unless your kids are very INTERNALLY motivated - meaning they are willing to be responsible for doing everything on their own, it's hard. There's also the lack of social stuff that happens at school, so if you have a social child, homeschooling usually bores them.
For a child whose allergy is THAT severe, I think that needs to be something the parent is prepared to deal with by maybe not having their child at a school without a nutfree campus-wide policy at all times. It is not fair to cause a whole school or other place to make a new policy that takes away from everybody else for ONE person with an allergy. Most kids with nut allergies just need to not INGEST nut products, which means they are safe enough as long as THEY know and everyone else knows they are not allowed to have nut products.
@flapiz (23148)
• United Kingdom
16 Sep 12
Hi coffee break! That is a weird school. I am a highly allergic person. I have bronchial asthma, skin asthma, and even allergic rhinitis. I also have food allergies, but it has never crossed my mind to deprive others of what they like because I cannot enjoy those things. I think it is wrong for a school to impose that as people with allergy especially children should learn at a young age that they could not have it all and to learn control. It is the time to start the accepetance process not hinder it.
Btw, sometimes I do eat foods which I'm allergic to even when I know it. But only a little tiny bit. It's called systemic desensitization. Well there are days that I don't get allergy from them at all.
I'm allergic but I do not deprive myself, much more others of the good things in life.
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Sep 12
The kids just need to be taught about themselves and responsibility for themselves.
I am not allergic, but I can't eat onions, bell peppers, or garlic...due to acid reflux...but do I make everyone in the resturant not order things with those ingredients? No, I just order mine food without those things.
@flapiz (23148)
• United Kingdom
17 Sep 12
Right, right! Allergies is a lifetime condition so the kids should start coping early. We cannot protect them all the times from the world so they must learn to protect themselves at an early age.
@Jshean20 (14348)
• Canada
16 Sep 12
I agree that it's important for parents to teach a child with allergies the "do's and don'ts", just like a child with asthma has to be taught a few things as it's not like it would be acceptable to take gym class out of schools just because one child cannot run for long periods of time due to his/her asthma attacks.
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
16 Sep 12
Really, what's next? 'We can't do physical education any more because we have too many kids with asthma and kids who are disabled and kids whose parents wrote notes to the school excusing them from running'. Perfect way to cause more disease and obesity and this isn't EVEN touching the issue of food lol.
I would rather have gym class every day for preschool through college than have ANYBODY dictating what is okay or not to eat. And gym class can be accomodated to cover everybody, even if they have physical limitations!
@djbtol (5493)
• United States
15 Sep 12
It is one example of how political correctness produces a fear that inhibits people from thinking on their own. I've heard about this thing with peanuts / peanut butter before and it is just nuts. There is no reason to change the lunch options. IF the parents and this child cannot handle normal society, then they have the burden to find another option.
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Sep 12
Yeah, that stupid "politically correctness" crap. And thing is...it wasn't the kid with the allergy complaining or being addressed...it was just a kid with something in his lunch that some other kid is allergic to! Teacher should have gone to the kid with the allergy and just said.."you know you can't eat that PBJ don't you?" or soemthing like that.
@GardenGerty (160626)
• United States
16 Sep 12
The problem with peanut allergy is that it is such a life threatening thing that some people cannot even breathe the air where a peanut product is. The solution is to have a "peanut free" room. That may even be on a separate ventilation system. The custodians can sanitize it regularly. I work in a situation that we cannot have peanut products in the building when a certain client is present. I can also see kids thinking they are being smart or cute and deliberately exposing the allergic child to peanuts for fun. I think it is wise for the school employees to be trained with epi pens, and that there be one available in the school in much the same way as there are fire extinguishers.
My daughter struggles to find food to send with my granddaughter to school, as she is a picky eater and eats slowly. Those kids at her school have twenty minutes to eat lunch daily. Her husband will not let her home school at this time. I am pretty certain that peanut butter is a staple in her lunches.
Teachers get roped into extra duty all the time, lunch duty, book sales, recess duty, bathroom duty. . . I think we do not respect them and let them do the very important job of teaching.
@GardenGerty (160626)
• United States
16 Sep 12
I have had experience with school systems and have worked for them. Usually much smaller schools.The people I saw with "double standards", mostly, were aides. Occasionally they were bullies. I will also say that I had more trouble with Admins. Way too many of them and they often are over paid and out of touch.I believe PBJ has been removed in the schools here, at least as a secondary option if you do not want the meal. Used to kids could request it in the lunch line if they did not want the entree. That may be new federal guidelines. I have not heard that the kids cannot bring it. I just checked with my daughter and she still sends it for brown bag where she lives. There was a big deal awhile back in another state where the school deemed a turkey sandwich and fruit not to be a healthy meal and threw it out and gave the kid chicken nuggets, not a good swap in my book, but now that is the secondary choice in our local schools if they do not want the entree. I am afraid they would look at my GD food and say it is not healthy, but again, they only have 20 minutes to eat and my daughter sends what she knows she will eat. In our elementary schools which is what I am most familiar with at this time the kids are encouraged to bring a water bottle and keep it filled and have it at their desk all day, and they have morning snacks or afternoon snacks as well. A mind needs energy to work. I am sorry that the school is not dealing better with the allergy situation. I think they are messing with things that they need to leave alone. I guess I am also fortunate in that many of the classroom teachers get out an interact with the kids or start "walking clubs" on recess. Of course, one of the reasons I chose to live here instead of some other place. My college work study job had me in the schools and I liked them.
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Sep 12
I think all those things are the regular duty of a teacher. How many times have I been asked to "pitch in" at my office to cover this one or that one or help out for one reason or another...with no extra pay? There are enough teachers in any school that they could be assigned "lunch room duty" once a month and never repeat in a month.
But my same point..they "took it out" on the kid WITH the PBJ and said nothing to the kid with the allergy. All that is doing is telling the kids with the allergy that they don't have to be concerned about their allergy..the rest of the population will make adjustments for them.
And I think alot of teachers in my experience (12 years for two kids and so far to 7th grade with my grand daughter)... I see double standards. Teachers can run in the hall ways.. but kids get detention if they do. Kids can't have a drink or bottle of water or the like anywhere but in the cafeteria and only at lunch..but the teachers walk around with mugs and travel mugs of coffee all the time and have it at their desks..but kids can't. I have seen teachers cross the grounds in a way the kids are told they can't. I have seen teachers yell at kids, but send the kids to the principle if they are yelling at each other on the play ground. I see them telling the kids "walk while out side ... you need the exercise" but see the teachers lounging under the shade trees or on benches. It is so "do as I say, not as I do". With homework right now (and when Mine were in school) teachers teach it and demand the kids know it for tests, but if the kids need extra help to understand/learn the topic, the teachers refuse to give extra help. Sorry, my personal experience makes me have no room for respect for most teachers. Yes, some are good, but in my experience...I haven't seen to many. And I would volunteer at my GD's school..and saw some sights!
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
17 Sep 12
I have a solution to the problem of teachers being asked to perform all these 'extra' duties - use parent volunteers if they are available. I know I would do it.
I think we were allowed to have water bottles. I remember hearing about that 'other' situation where a lunch was taken away and that irritates me. Stuff like that means the child might eat NO lunch then, since many times, kids bring a lunch from home because they don't like/won't eat the lunches at school!
1 person likes this
@jillhill (37354)
• United States
16 Sep 12
I think you are right....and there are way too many people who are making rules for others to follow that I don't think should have the power....like the mayor of New York saying no one can buy a large soft drink....now isn't that something we should be able to make our minds up about? And brown bagging it? What if you kid doesnt' like the choices by the school? They can go hungry because someone else can't eat peanuts?
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Sep 12
I agree. And the thing is...they are making those that DON'T have the allergy do the "work" to accomodate those that do, instead of making those that DO have the allergy take responsibility and learn what to do.
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
16 Sep 12
You sure do if you are there and involved and know what is going on. This is why people should ALWAYS say something if things are not going as expected or isn't acceptable. One of the reasons things like this even HAPPEN at all is because people it happens to are afraid to speak up and then it happens again to someone else! If the first person it happened to got angry and went to the media and raised a stink and sued people, you can bet maybe it wouldn't happen again.
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
16 Sep 12
This is typical of any government based system. The government, being 'of the people' has to cater to all the people. This automatically means the lowest common denominator of society.
Thus if one person in the entire school is offended, bothered, harmed, discomforted by anything, everyone else must abide by that system.
Same thing as you can't pray in schools. It's offending that one twit in the corner, that you are praying to a 'god' he doesn't believe in, so now no one can pray in a school. Poor Timmy was offended.
1 person likes this
@GardenGerty (160626)
• United States
16 Sep 12
On the subject of prayer in schools, you cannot stop people from praying. . . you just cannot institutionalize it. If we allowed prayer, as a Christian act of worship, we would have to allow the muslims to pray, on their prayer rug, facing east five times a day. The people who have other cultures would also have a right to pray as their belief system. I get upset, though, when private Christian (or Catholic) or any other religion gets told it cannot require students to pray, even though they voluntarily signed up for the Christian, Hindu, Muslim, Catholic private school knowing what it stands for.
@much2say (55562)
• Los Angeles, California
16 Sep 12
In that example, I am guessing the teacher thought that would be the proper thing to do - only because there was already a peanut ban at the school. Was it just protocol to take away any food items seen by teachers that obviously had peanuts in it? Also, in this example, I have to wonder if the parents were aware of the no peanut product policy - and if they were aware, why didn't they follow the rules? I'm not trying to take sides . . . I'm just saying that was already a rule at the school - so why were the parents upset about it. (Like I said - ONLY IN THIS EXAMPLE!).
At our school, they teach not to share to food (or at least I see signs in the lunch area with that being one of the rules). I know my daughter has had plenty of classmates with peanut allergies . . . and I'd have to say I'm pretty impressed how these kids (now in 2nd grade) are able to manage their own allergies for the most part. There was only one allergic child in 1st grade who had issues with 2 girls who sat next to him who were bullying him into eating peanut butter (the 2 girls thought that was funny) . . . but I know this kid knows and understands that peanuts make him sick and that he knows to stay away from them on his own (being coerced to eat it is a whole 'nother issue). I guess the scare might be if one kid shares his peanut food with another kid who cannot control themselves regarding their own peanut allergies.
There's only one school locally that I know is a peanut free school (maybe it's all nuts - I'm not sure). I don't know how they handle things there.
Yah, I feel for those kids with the allergies too. But I don't know that it's necessary to ban peanuts/nuts completely at a school. We know kids who are allergic to other foods too, it's not just peanuts - like strawberries, dairy, eggs - but there are no food bans to accommodate them. And yes, it's not fair to the rest of us either.
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Sep 12
But even all that said...still the teacher shouldn't have taken it out on the kid with the PBJ. Tell him not to share his sandwich and then call the parent. Maybe they didn't know. And what if this kid was allergic to something on the school menu that the teacher got for him? There are alot of kids that are allergic to milk or lactose intolerant..but do they take milk out of schools? Of course not.
My son (now 30) was in 3rd grade when the diplorable peanut allergy came to town. So the issue has been out there for years and years. You'd think the schools could be doing better with this issue after all these years of "practice"!!!!
@much2say (55562)
• Los Angeles, California
16 Sep 12
That is true. Or maybe have him eat aside and make sure he washes his hands if there is paranoia about him possibly affecting an allergic child. I'll have to ask a parent of someone in that peanut free school how it works . . . surely it must happen that a parent forgot or didn't realize. I don't know how strict they are either because certain food products do contain nut ingredients that are not so obvious.
@Otanetix (508)
• United States
16 Sep 12
While I do feel concerned about people who suffer from peanut allergies, I do not feel that it is ever okay to confiscate someone's lunch, especially from a child. I understand that there are people with severe peanut allergies that might react to airborne nut dust from the peanut products, but taking someone's lunch is absolutely inexcusable.
When I was a child, I had brought lunches from home and some of my friends also did the same. There are children that bring lunches from home because their parents do not provide them lunch money. I am not blaming the parents who don't provide them lunch money because they might be in financial bind or something of that sort and that is understandable. However, what kind of school administration would allow some children to go hungry because their lunches were confiscated? Of course, I am only assuming this if the school did not replace their confiscated lunches with some sort of lunch alternative, which was free of charge.
If the school administration is so worried about people with severe peanut allergies that might be affected by the particles of airborne nut dust, then allow them to eat in an area which is free of nut dust. This can happen by questioning kids that bring lunches from home if they brought foods containing peanuts. Better yet, the school administration can send some letter to the parents asking them to try not to make their children peanut-based foods. If that does not work, then there needs to be a meeting between the parents and the administration to resolve the issue. Despite the school having good intentions, the children without the allergies should be denied having a meal.
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Sep 12
Good idea. and they could also say.."we designate this table for kids with food allergies ONLY"...and let the kids sit there. But in reading all the comments here.. it makes me think... is the school doing this out of concern for the kids or out of concern for themselves? I have to think that if it was concern for the kids...they'd do it in a far more kindly manner and make the issue with the allergic kid, as in "I know you are allergic to peanuts and some of those kids over there have peanut butter sandwiches..so why don't you come over to this table today" or"...make sure you don't eat any of their lunch, eat only your own". And what if there was nothing on that lunch menu the kid liked? I have read the lunch menu from my grand daughter when she was in elementary school.... those lunches were so not sounding good or something that a kid would say "oh, I want that!"...they were pretty gross I thought!
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
16 Sep 12
Yes, it is starting to sound like the school is acting this way out of fear of being sued, when in all actuality, if I found out a school took away my daughter's lunch, THAT would be a reason FOR ME TO SUE THEM. Kind of like the way doctors sometimes refuse to do something out of fear of being sued - all I have to say is - if you do not LISTEN to your patient and do what THEY want, THEN you should worry about being sued. Don't worry about being sued otherwise! I'll even sign a document stating I won't sue you as long as you comply since I'm the customer. Sheesh.
@maximax8 (31046)
• United Kingdom
1 Oct 12
At my disabled son's primary school some children have school dinners and some have packed lunches brought in from home. My disabled son eats a vegan diet so school dinners wouldn't suit him. I think any filling is fine for sandwiches. In America peanut butter and jam sandwiches are very popular. A peanut allergy can be very serious indeed. A child with a peanut allergy should go home for lunch. I heard a lady with a peanut allergy had an allergic reaction with a lemon pie. For a person with a peanut allergy just a tiny amount of it is enough for a severe allergic reaction. Children should be supervised in the school dining hall. They should eat their own food. The parent can teach their children what they are allowed to eat.
@natliegleb (5175)
• India
16 Sep 12
this just cannot be tolerated at any point of time and this is totally ridiculous and beyond imagination.i would never allow this thing to happen if i found out