Christianity or islam?

Eric, are you saying there is only one correct way to G-d? And the only two choices are Islam Or Christianity? Well I am sorry to inform you but these two are not the only true religions. And there is a middle , it is called Judaism.And there are other paths altogether.So if you just narrow it down to only these two, then many will be "damned" and it is ok. See I rather live my life, be close to my G-d the way I choose to be than Have to completely change to appease a version of G-d I do not feel comfortable with.

yes.. after all in the end God will show who is right and I think God will not just show who is right but bring judgement to the deceived and deceiver, which are true in both Christianity and Muslim.. but the thing is there is no middle with it, if you choose the neutral side then you are judge already... So maybe the least we can do is to choice the right one,... which is which? we are talking eternity here, it is the most at stake....

Sarah , Yes , respect is the key , but some people not have this respect to the others beliefs . ericpapasit , "God will show who is right " Sure He will do .

Hi ericpapasit, I think you will find that the golden rule is the same in all religions. The words may be different but it means the same thing. Blessings.

Harsh word there friend, please minimize, remember the golden rule

Yeah, but the two views carries also a Golden rule, then the question is which is which?

Both Muslims and Christians agree that only Jesus lived without sin Can you tell me which Muslims agree with you on that? All prophets lived sin free lives for your information. Whoever tells you some prophet sinned is a lier. Please stop speaking on behalf of Muslims.

I should also point out that Muhammad's replacement of Jesus with Isa is disrespectful and insulting to both Christians and Jesus all the best urban

Other Muslims have agreed with that statement and It is written that Allah forgave Muhammad for his sins, therefore he sinned! Moses sinned when he struck the Egyptian and when he acted in pride all the best urban

maidangela, I think the Gospels were probably writen sooner than you claim. John's Gospel was written by the "beloved desiple" who many people think was the apostle John. I suspect that this was really written by the virgin Mary's sister (Jesus' aunt) if you read John 19:25-27 carefully, it says that the beloved disciple was standing beside Mary after listing the people who were with her (this gospel never names it's author and the aunt is the only one who's name isn't given). There's good reason to think that Luke (an associate of Paul) wrote Luke's Gosple. There's some reason to think that John Mark wrote Mark's Gospel. I suspect that Paul or Timothy wrote Matthew's Gospel, both Matthew and Luke having been written at or as a result of the meeting Paul is arranging in 2 Tim 4:11-13. I think you can try to piece together the various Gospels to get to the truth. I don't believe anything is actually wrong, just some give different details or don't follow chronological order well. I also think some of the difference are coded messages - this is perhaps most apparent with the two genealogies of Jesus which when combined give a patten similar to the Kabalistic tree of life.

What on earth do you mean by written harmoniously. If you mean one copied from another we know that has been done other than that I can' see the relevance of the word in this context. As for the gospels being corrupt it depends on what you mean by corrupt. They have been translated and rewritten on a number of occasions and this must lead to changes in the words and meanings. I doubt if anyone has had their life miraculously changed by reading a gospel. They may have been inspired to change their lives inspired by what was written but that is hardly a miracle unless of course you wish to imagine it is. I am sure people have been inspired to change their lives by reading all sorts of documents and books. I know I have but I never thought it was any sort of miracle. I was also puzzled by Graptopetalum's comment about coded messages in the gospels. I fail to see any relevance to this either as what is the point of a coded message if you can't work out what it means and if you can why bother with a code. I think the whole idea takes us into cloud cuckoo land.

Also it is noted how the Gospel written harmoniously, and how those gospel changed life for good... I don't think the Gospel is corrupted... after all as Christian claimed it is inspired by God, and many people has been miraculously changed their life powerfully, as well as the Quran... again, Christianity or Islam?

without knowing about Quran and prophet muhammed, how can u tell thats a false teaching? First know Quran and hadith properly.... There are 124000 Prophets came to world, In that some where around about 10 prophets name mentioned in Quran include Jesus.... Before Prophethood muhammed (sal) was uneducated, then how can create something similar to bible... After prophethood Allah gave the knowledge... First read Quran and Hadith Properly, then talk.... or else dont talk false words

Yeah samar, that's the point, it is how to interpret God, but just curious that if we compare the view of Jesus to the Historical Jesus, we can see history favor one view, unless historian is corrupted. well, in others words one of the view is valid.

ericpapasit , I don't think that Jesus (PBUH) said : I'm your god , worship me , he said " And this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God and Jesus Christ, who you sent .17 - 3

That's one sided man... please elaborate..